The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Brilliance big bore scanner

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in United States

The Brilliance Big Bore scanner is a medical imaging device manufactured by Philips. It is designed for diagnostic imaging procedures, providing high-quality images to assist healthcare professionals in their assessments. The core function of the Brilliance Big Bore scanner is to capture detailed images of the patient's anatomy using advanced scanning technology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using brilliance big bore scanner

1

CT-based Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Planning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computed tomography (CT) scanning and simulations were performed using Philips Brilliance Big Bore Scanner (Philips Medical, Cambridge, MA) with patients in a supine position and by following the standard CT scan protocol. The thickness of each CT image in axial dimension was 1.5 mm. The contouring of prostate, left femur, right femur, bladder, and rectum was performed by a radiation oncologist on the axial slices of the CT using the Varian Eclipse™ treatment planning system version 13.7 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The OARs included bladder, rectum, left, and right femur. The OAR volumes were contoured according to the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG‐0815) protocol.16 The prostate was defined as a clinical target volume from which the PTV was generated by adding a 5 mm margin in all directions. Mean PTV volume was 86 ± 25 cc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Robustness Evaluation of Deep Learning Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the robustness of the final deep learning segmentation network, a dataset of over 15,000 deceased subjects with different acquisition parameters and population distribution was acquired from the NMDID.34 We selected 10 patients with death by natural cause, age under 50 and similar positioning to patients from the UMCU dataset: 6 male and 4 female patients, with a mean age of 34 years (SD: 6.4 years). For each subject, two CT scans were available which included the lower extremities. A torso scan, including the coxae and femur, and a lower leg scan, including the tibia, fibula, talus, calcaneus and femur. All CT scans were acquired on a Philips Brilliance Big Bore scanner (Philips Medical Systems). The CT acquisition parameters were: tube voltage = 120 kVp, tube current = 82–245 mA, effective dose = 100–301 mAs, slice thickness = 1 mm, slice increment = 0.5 mm, pixel spacing = 0.63–1.17 mm, matrix size = 512 × 512 pixels. The images were resampled using trilinear interpolation to isotropic 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm to match the voxel size of the UMCU dataset more closely. Due to high noise levels in the proximal part of the lower leg scan and in the torso scan, a Gaussian filter (sigma = 0.5, kernel size = 4) was applied before segmentation. Examples of CT scans from both datasets are shown in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CT Lung Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT scan was performed using three CT scanners, including UCT-760 scanner (Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), Discovery CT750 HD (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA), and Philips Brilliance Big Bore scanner (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands). All scans were performed without intravenous contrast on patients who were placed in the supine position at the end inspiration phase. Images were reconstructed to encompass the entire lung field in a 512 × 512-pixel matrix using a standard algorithm at a 1-mm section thickness and a 1-mm interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Neuroimaging Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR images were acquired on a 3T Philips Ingenia scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) as part of routine clinical care. T1-weighted MR images were acquired with a 3D turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequence without contrast enhancement, with the following parameters: TR = 8.1 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8°, 213 continuous axial slices without gap, matrix: 207 × 289, voxel resolution 1 × 0.96 × 0.96mm. The planning CT scans were acquired on a Brilliance Big bore scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), with a tube potential of 120 kVp, using a matrix size of 512 × 512 and 0.65 × 0.65 × 3.0 mm voxel size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CT Imaging Protocol for Radiotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All treatment planning CT images were acquired using a Brilliance Big Bore scanner (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) with 120 kVp, 284 mAs, 0.814 ± 0.814 mm2 in-plane spatial resolution, and 1-mm slice thickness. All patients were immobilized using a head frame combined with thermoplastic mask.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Head Immobilization for Radiation Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients were immobilized for simulation and treatment in the cranial Freedom System™ (CDR Systems, Alberta, Canada) utilizing a custom head mold and an open face mask. A triangulation point was marked on the mask using BBs at time of simulation and used for initial setup at treatment with shifts to the planner determined isocenter. Computed tomography (CT) images were reconstructed at 1.25 mm slice thickness on a Brilliance BigBore scanner (Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA). Contrast‐enhanced SPGR (1 mm) and T1‐weighted (3 mm) magnetic resonance images were fused to the CT images using MIM (version 6.6.3; MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) and auto‐segmentation of normal structures was also generated in this systems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CT Imaging in Full Bladder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The original CT data sets were obtained on a Phillips Brilliance Big Bore scanner using 2 mm slices with the patient in a supine position. Patients were instructed to have a full bladder at time of simulation and treatment, however, bowel preparation to ensure an empty bowel was not performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Imaging of Liver in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients with BC underwent CT on a Brilliance Big Bore scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) at 120 kV and 350 mA. Data acquisition was performed during a single breath-hold following the standard algorithm for all image displays.
NEMIO XG (Toshiba, Tustin, California) ultrasound (US) system with a microconvex transducer 3.5 to 5.0 MHz was used to measure the blood flow velocity and evaluate the efficacy of the combined chemotherapy and RIMH treatment, following the standard method for liver US imaging. Patients with BC underwent a comprehensive US examination of the liver in several modes: real-time mode, B-mode, tissue harmonic imaging, and Doppler mode (Doppler color and energy imaging of the hepatic artery and portal vein).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MRI and CT Imaging Protocol for Radiomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were acquired at the time of simulation, prior to the start of treatment. For both training and validation sets, T1-weighted MRI was acquired using Siemens Magnetom Espree 1.5 T scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) with a turbo spin echo sequence post-Gd administration (TE = 8.9 ms, TR = 577 ms, flip angle = 150°, matrix size = 256 × 256, pixel size ranged from 0.8 × 0.8 mm2 to 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 depending on the field of view defined at simulation, and slice thickness = 3 mm). To reduce bias and improve interpretation of the image features, MR images were resampled such that the in-plane pixel size was consistently 0.89 × 0.89 mm2, which was the size for majority of the patients. CT images were acquired using a 16-slice Philips Brilliance Big Bore scanner (Philips, Andover, MA) with tube voltage 120 kVp and exposure of 200 mAs. Images had 512 × 512 pixels with a pixel size of 1.2 × 1.2 mm2, and a slice thickness of 3 mm. CT images with metal artifacts (most commonly caused by dental fillings and implants) were corrected using Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants reconstruction. However, patients with severe artifacts were excluded in the image analysis to avoid undesirable strong influence to the image features and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pre-RT Imaging for Brain Tumor Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For every patient, the pre-RT CT and MRI were collected, as well as all available follow-up MRIs. MR images were acquired on a 3T Philips Ingenia scanner (Philips Medical Systems) as part of routine clinical care. T1-weighted MR images were acquired with a 3D turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequence without gadolinium enhancement with the following parameters: TR = 8.1 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8°, 213 continuous axial slices without gap, matrix: 207 × 289, voxel resolution 1 × 0.96 × 0.96 mm. The planning CT scans were acquired on a Brilliance Big bore scanner (Philips Medical Systems), with a tube potential of 120 kVp, with the use of a matrix size of 512 × 512 and 0.65 × 0.65 × 3.0 mm voxel size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!