The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chromafil ao 20 25

Manufactured by Macherey-Nagel
Sourced in Germany

Chromafil AO-20/25 is a syringe filter designed for the filtration of samples prior to analysis. It features a polyamide membrane with a pore size of 0.20 or 0.25 microns, and a polypropylene housing. The filter is available in different diameter sizes to accommodate various sample volumes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using chromafil ao 20 25

1

Methanolic Extraction of Flower Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extractions were performed as described by [38 (link)]. For each population, 0.3 g of fresh squashed flowers were immersed in 2 mL of methanolic solution (70% Methanol, 27% bi-distilled water and 3% formic acid). Three repetitions per population were prepared. All samples were placed in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min and then centrifuged at 8000× g and 4 °C for 7 min (5810 R; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatants were then filtered into vials through 0.2 µm Chromafil® AO-20/25 (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) polyamide filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction and Quantification of Pepper Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of the pepper fruit pericarp was performed as described above and by Mikulic-Petkovsek et al. (2013) [68 (link)], with slight modifications. Fresh tissue samples were cut into small pieces and ground in a mortar cooled with liquid nitrogen. Then 5 g was extracted with 8 mL methanol with 3% (w/v) formic acid in an ultrasonic ice bath for 1 h. After extraction, the samples were centrifuged at 9000× g rpm for 7 min and then filtered through 0.20-µm polyamide filters (Chromafil AO-20/25; Macherey-Nagel, Dueren, Hamburg, Germany) and transferred to vials before injection into the HPLC system.
The individual phenolics were analyzed on the HPLC system (Accela; Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) with a diode detector, at 280 nm (flavones), 310 nm (hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives), and 350 nm (flavonols), under the conditions described by Wang et al. (2002) [70 (link)]. All of the phenolic compounds were identified by mass spectrometry (LCQ Deca XP MAX; Thermo Scientific) with electrospray ionization and operated in negative ion mode, as described by Mikulic-Petkovsek et al. [69 (link)].
The concentrations of phenolic compounds were calculated from peak areas of the sample and the corresponding standards and were expressed as mg·(100 g)−1 FW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phytochemical Analysis of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For phytochemical analysis, the husk powders were first extracted by hexane (non-polar extract) and then air-dried plant residues were extracted by ethanol and bi-distilled water (polar extract). The extraction process steps of polar and apolar compounds were the same, and powder to solvent ratio was 1:20 (both for hexane and ethanol 80%). Briefly, the mixtures of plant material and solvent were first shaken well for 5 min using a vortex mixer (TOP-MIX 94,500; Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany), and then sonicated in iced water (Fisherbrand S-Series, ThermoFisher, Milan, Italy) for 60 min. Centrifugation (Z36 HK, Hermle, Germany) at 13,540× g for 10 min was performed to accelerate the extraction of compounds. For polar compounds, a 0.2 µm polyamide filter (Chromafil AO-20/25; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), and for apolar compounds, a 0.2 µm polytetrafluoroethylene filter (Chromafil Xtra PTFE-20/25 Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) was used. The resultant polar and non-polar extracts were then transferred to vials and stored at −32 °C until further analysis [21 (link)]. 2.4. Qualitative Analysis of Apolar Extract by GC-MS
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phenolic Compound Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic compounds were extracted in an ice-cold ultrasonic bath for 60 min with 70% EtOH using an equivalent of 30 mg/mL dry weight. The homogenates were centrifuged for 8 min at 9500 rpm. The supernatant was filtered through a Chromafil AO-20/25 polyamide ester filter produced by Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Bioactive Compounds in Kiwifruit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were prepared according to Mikulic-Petkovsek et al.22 (link). The extract for sugars and acids was prepared from 5 g of fruit pericarp without the peel of A. chinensis and 5 g of whole fruit of A. arguta, as the fruits of A. arguta are eaten without peeling and the fruits of A. chinensis must be peeled before consumption. Plant material was cut into small pieces and 25 ml of double distilled water was added to the test tubes of each sample. Samples were placed on a shaker for 30 min on room temperature. After they were put in a centrifuge (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5810 R) for 5 min at 5000 rpm at 4 °C. Samples were filtered through a cellulose filter Chromafil A-20/25 produced by Macherey–Nagel (Düren, Germany), transferred to a vial and stored at − 20 °C until analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Extract for phenols was prepared according to Mikulic-Petkovsek et al.23 (link) in test tubes from 5 g of fruit pericarp without peel of A. chinensis and 5 g of whole fruit of A. arguta, and 10 ml of methanol with 3% formic acid was added. Test tubes were places in a cooled ultrasonic bath for 60 min. After the sample was centrifuged for 8 min at 8000 rpm, supernatant was filtered through a polyamide filter Chromafil AO-20/25 produced by Macherey–Nagel (Düren, Germany), transferred to a vial and stored at − 20 °C until the start of the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction of Phenolic and Dicarboxylic Compounds from Chestnuts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic compounds and dicarboxylic acid derivatives were extracted according to the protocol described by Medic et al. [6 (link)]. Twenty chestnuts per cultivar were used, with five chestnuts per replicate. The chestnuts were weighed; then, the seed coat was removed, and the pellicles were peeled. The peeled raw chestnuts were then ground using a mechanical mill (A10 basic; IKA Works GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany). Briefly, 1 g of the sample was then extracted with 80% methanol in bi-distilled water. The extraction ratio was 1:2.5 (w/v). The samples were then vortexed (TOP-MIX 94500 vortex mixer; Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany), sonicated in iced water for 60 min (Sonis 4 ultrasonic bath; Iskra pio, Sentjernej, Slovenia), and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Samples were then filtered with a 0.2 µm polyamide filter (Chromafil AO −20/25; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), transferred to vials, and stored at −20 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analysis of Fruit Juice Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of the sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds, the method described in previous protocols was used [16 (link),17 (link),18 (link)]. All the treatments, i.e., the various juices, were filtered using 0.2 µm cellulose filters (Chromafil Xtra MV-20/25; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) into vials for the subsequent analysis of the sugars and organic acids. For the analysis of the phenolic compounds, 0.2 µm polyamide filters (Chromafil AO-20/25; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) were used for filtration. The vials containing the filtered samples were stored at −20 °C until further analysis of the organic acids, sugars, and phenolic compounds. The ascorbic acid was extracted in a 1:1 ratio, whereby 1 mL of apple juice was mixed with 1 mL of 2% metaphosphoric acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenolic Extraction in Cherry Tomatoes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of phenolic compounds in cherry tomatoes was performed as described by Slatnar et al. (2012) (link), with slight modifications. Three fruits per individual treatment (in five repetitions) were mashed to a pulp and 10 g were extracted with 13 mL methanol containing 3% (v/v) formic acid in a cooled ultrasonic bath for 1 h. After extraction, the extracts were centrifuged for 7 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.20 µm polyamide filter Chromafil AO-20/25 (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), transferred to a vial and analyzed on a Thermo Finnigan Surveyor HPLC (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) with a diode array detector at 280 nm and 350 nm. Spectra of the compounds were recorded between 200 and 600 nm. The column was a Gemini C 18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm; Phenomenex, Torrance, USA) operated at 25°C. Samples were eluted according to the gradient described by Marks et al. (2007) (link).
All phenolic compounds were identified by an HPLC-Finnigan MS detector and an LCQ Deca XP MAX (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) described by Mikulic-Petkovsek et al. (2016) (link). The identification of compounds was confirmed by fragmentation, comparison of retention times and compound spectra as well as by adding the standard solution to the sample (Anton et al., 2014) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Capsaicinoids and Total Phenolics Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder (0.05 g) was extracted with 80% methanol. Samples were placed in a cooled ultrasonic bath (0 °C) for 1 h and then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 6 min and filtered through a 0.25 µm polyamide filter (Chromafil AO-20/25, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany).
The extraction procedure and settings of the HPLC-PDA Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC (Thermo Scientific) system, combined with a TSQ Quantum Access Max quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) (Thermo Fischer Scientific Institute, Waltham, MA, USA) system for capsaicinoids and spectrophotometric settings for total phenolics were based on Zamljen, Jakopič [19] . All data were expressed in mg/100 g dry weight (DW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!