The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using vital exclusion dye

1

Cytotoxicity Assay of CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ex vivo cytotoxic potential of CD8+ T cells was measured as previously described (45 (link)). Briefly, EL-4 cells (ATCC) were pulsed with 2 µM OVA257-264 peptide (AnaSpec) or no peptide for 1hr at 37°C. Peptide pulsed cells were stained with CFSE (Life Technologies) and unpulsed cells were stained with CellTrace Violet (Life Technologies) per manufacturers instructions. CD8+ T cells were enriched by negative selection using the EasySep Mouse CD8+ T cell enrichment kit (StemCell Technologies). The number of effector cells were determined by quantification of Kb/OVA+ CD8+ T cells and the appropriate numbers were added and the mixtures were incubated for 5 hrs at 37 °C. Following incubation, cells were stained with a vital exclusion dye (Life Technologies) to exclude dead cells. Fixed cells were acquired on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo v9.7.2 (Treestar). Specific lysis was calculated as 100 – [100 × ( % survival / average % survival in absence of effector cells)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing SIV Env-specific CD4 T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SIV Env-specific CD4 T cells were characterized as previously described (33 (link)). Briefly, 1 × 106 to 2 × 106 splenic and iliac LN mononuclear cells were stimulated for 5 h with 1 μg/ml of an overlapping SIVmac239 Env peptide pool (NIH AIDS Reagent Program) in the presence of GolgiStop and GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences). Cells were washed three times in autoMACS rinsing solution (Miltenyi Biotec) and stained with vital exclusion dye (Life Technologies) for 10 min at 4°C. Cells were again washed and treated with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences) for 20 min at 4°C. All subsequent washes and stainings were performed by using BD Perm/Wash (BD Biosciences). Cells were incubated with an interleukin-21 (IL-21) receptor (IL-21R)/Fc fusion protein (R&D Systems) for 30 min at 4°C, washed three times, and stained with goat anti-human Fcγ antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were subsequently washed three times and stained with anti-CD4 (RM4-5), anti-CD8a (53-6.7), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (XMG1.2), and anti-IL-2 (JES6-5H4) for 30 min at 4°C. Samples were washed three additional times, fixed in 2% formaldehyde, and stored at 4°C. Samples were acquired on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by using FlowJo v9.8.3 (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometry of Germinal Center B Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of iliac LN mononuclear cells were blocked with TruStain fcX (anti-mouse CD16/CD32) antibodies (BioLegend) for 10 min at 4°C. Cells were washed and stained for 30 min at 4°C with anti-CD3ε (145-2C11), anti-CD19 (6D5), anti-Fas (15A7), peanut agglutinin (PNA; Vector Laboratories), anti-IgM (RMM-1), and anti-IgD (11-26c.2a). Dead cells were excluded by the use of a vital exclusion dye (Life Technologies). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences, Affymetrix, or BioLegend, unless noted otherwise. Germinal center B cells were identified by flow cytometry as Fas+ PNA+ CD19+, as previously described (32 (link)). Samples were acquired on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by using FlowJo v9.8.3 (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Phenotyping of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions of tissues were generated as previously described, with slight modification (39 (link)). Briefly, liver tissue was not treated with EDTA or collagenase. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from whole blood by Ficoll-Hypaque density centrifugation at 1900 rpm for 20 min. MHC class I tetramer staining was performed using an H-2Db tetramer loaded with the immunodominant AL11 peptide (AAVKNWMTQTL) or GP33-41 peptide (KAVYNFATM) as previously described (40 (link)). Biotinylated class I monomers were kindly provided by the NIH Tetramer Core Facility (Emory University, GA). Background staining of cells from naïve animals was ≤0.1%. Surface staining was performed with anti-CD8α (53-6.7), -CD4 (RM4-5), -CD44 (IM7), -CD127 (A7R34), -CD62L (MEL-14), -KLRG1 (2F1), -CD122 (TM-β1), and -CD27 (LG.3A10). Transcription factor staining was performed by first permeabilizing the cells with the FoxP3 Fixation/Permeabilization kit (eBioscience) and subsequently staining with anti-T-bet (4B10). Annexin V staining was performed using an Annexin V staining kit (BioLegend). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences, eBioscience, or BioLegend. Vital exclusion dye was purchased from Invitrogen. After fixation, samples were acquired on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data was analyzed using FlowJo v9.3.3 (Treestar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PBMC Isolation and SIV Gag T-cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were bled submandibularly, and PBMCs from whole blood were isolated using Ficoll-Hypaque density centrifugation at 1,900 rpm for 20 min. Spleens were processed as previously described (24 (link)). Major histocompatibility complex class I tetramer staining was performed using the H-2Db tetramer loaded with the immunodominant AL11 peptide (AAVKNWMTQTL) as described previously (24 (link)). Biotinylated class I monomer was provided by the National Institutes of Health Tetramer Core Facility (Emory University, GA). PBMCs were surfaced stained with anti-PD-1 (clone RMP1-30), anti-CD8a (clone 53-6.7), anti-CD44 (clone IM7), and anti-KLRG1 (clone 2F1).
Splenocytes were stimulated with 1 μg/ml of an overlapping SIVmac239 Gag peptide pool. At the time of stimulation, brefeldin A (BD Biosciences) was added and samples were incubated for 5 h at 37°C. After the incubation, cells were washed and stained with the surface stain antibodies (mentioned above), permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences), and stained with anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2) antibodies for half an hour. Vital exclusion dye was purchased from Invitrogen. All antibodies were purchased from either BioLegend or BD Biosciences. All samples were acquired using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo (version 9.6.4) software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolating Myeloid Cells from Murine Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain single cell suspensions, tumours were processed using a gentleMacs dissociator and a murine dissociation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Surrey, UK). For staining of cells, non-specific binding was blocked with rat anti-CD16/CD32 Fc block on ice. Cells were incubated with Gr-1–FITC, CD11b–APC (eBioscience, Leicestershire, UK), washed in 1% FCS/PBS. For analysis, live cells were gated using vital dye exclusion (Invitrogen) and population phenotyped on FACs Canto (BD Bioscience) and analyzed using Flow Jo software. An example of the gating strategy employed is provided in Figure S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tumor Dissociation and Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain single cell suspensions, tumours were processed using a gentleMacs dissociator and a murine dissociation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). For staining of cells, non-specific binding was blocked with rat anti-CD16/CD32 Fc block on ice. Cells were incubated with Gr-1 FITC, CD11b-APC (eBiosceince), washed in 1% FCS/PBS. For analysis, live cells were gated using vital dye exclusion (Invitrogen) and population phenotyped on FACs Canto (BD Bioscience) and analysed using Flow Jo software. An example of the gating strategy employed for selection of either CD45 -, CD45 + , or CD45 + CD11b + Gr1 + cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!