The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quantity one software

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, China, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Spain, Japan, France, Canada, Sweden, Israel, Australia

Quantity One software is a powerful and versatile tool for analyzing and quantifying data from gel electrophoresis and imaging experiments. It provides a suite of analytical tools for researchers to accurately measure and compare the size, intensity, and other properties of bands or spots in their samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 089 protocols using quantity one software

1

Steady-State Kinetics of DNA Polymerase KTqM747K

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Steady-state kinetics parameters for single nucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerase KTqM747K were determined under single completed hit conditions (37 (link),38 (link)). For various dNTP concentrations, the quantity of n + 1 product formed by performing the reaction at 55°C was measured. Reaction mixtures included 5 nM enzyme, 100 nM primer, 150 nM template, and 1× KTq reaction buffer. Reactions were initiated by adding pre-warmed enzyme and DNA mix to pre-warmed dNTPs. Reactions were quenched by adding PAGE loading buffer. Products were separated on a 15% polyacrylamide/7M urea denaturing gel, visualized by autoradiography, and quantified with Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad). To obtain kinetic parameters vmax, KM and kcat, the intensities of n + 1 bands (quantified on the Quantity One Software, Bio-Rad) were fit to a Michaelis–Menten rectangular hyperbola using SigmaPlot12 Software (Systat Software). Reactions were performed in triplicate and for KM values, means (± standard deviations) are reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Expression Analysis by SDS-PAGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell protein lysates were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE), transferred to 0.22-μm NC membranes (Sigma), and incubated with specific antibodies. ECL chromogenic substrate was used for quantification by densitometry (Quantity One software; Bio-Rad). Antibodies against GAPDH, CDKN1A and KLF2 were used to detect target proteins (Abcam, Hong Kong, China). Protein bands were quantified by densitometry (Quantity One software; Bio-Rad). GAPDH was used as loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Pancreatic and Hepatic Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the pancreas and liver tissues of 2-, 4- and 7-day-old neonates, western blot analysis of insulin promoter factor, duodenal homeobox gene-1 (PDX-1) and anti-apoptosis factor B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) was carried out as previously described (18 (link)). Primary antibodies included rabbit anti-PDX-1 diluted at 1:4,000 (#2437, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-Bcl-2 diluted at 1:4,000 (AB1722, Millipore), rabbit anti-betatrophin diluted at 1:4,000 (ab180915, Abcam), rabbit anti-Bax diluted at 1:1,000 (#2772T, Cell Signaling Technology) and rabbit anti-β-tubulin diluted at 1:2,000 (#2128, Cell Signaling Technology). The intensity of bands was analyzed using Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad). Peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was diluted at 1:8,000 (ZB2301, ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). The protein concentration was measured using Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Fusion Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of total RNA and reverse transcription into cDNA were the same as described above. The specific primers for the fusion gene were 5'-CCTACCCTCTCAACGACAGC-3' (forward) and 5'-CTCTGACCTTTTGCAAGGAG-3' (reverse). Those for β-actin were the same as the above. PCR condition was as follow: pre-denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 45s; a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel and analyzed with Quantity One Software (BIO-RAD, USA).
Protein concentrations in the cell lysates were determined by BCA protein assay kit (Bi Yun Tian, Shang Hai). Equal amounts of proteins (50 μg) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose sheets. The proteins were then probed with the mouse monoclonal antibody C-MYC (Zhongshan Goldenbridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Zhongshan Goldenbridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Protein bands were visualized using the Quantity One Software (BIO-RAD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction and Western blot analysis were performed as described previously (15 (link), 25 (link), 39 (link)). Briefly, 50 µg proteins were resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking with 1% BSA in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween for 2 h at room temperature, membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the specific antibody (dilution 1:1000). Subsequently, blots were re-probed with the respective total antibodies (1:1000) or GAPDH (1:1500) for normalization. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:4000) and goat anti-rabbit (1:10000) secondary antibodies by enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (ECL, Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy) using ChemiDoc XRS (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy); densitometric analysis was performed with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Densitometric analysis was carried out with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of hCMEC/D3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detergent extracts of the HCMEC/D3 cells and hCMEC/D3-MDR1-EGFP cells were prepared as described before21 (link) and subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-PGP 1:200 (Signet Laboratories, Dedham, MA, USA), anti-acetyl-histone-H4 1:200 (pan Lys 5, 8, 12, Merck Chemicals GmbH, Schwalbach, Deutschland) and anti-actin 1:1000 (Sigma-Aldrich) as primary antibiodies. The secondary antibodies utilized anti-mouse-HRP 1:1000 and anti-rabbit-HRP 1:1000 (Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using SuperSignal West Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific) and the ChemiDoc system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) with QuantityOne software (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The indicated protein signals were quantified densitometrically with QuantityOne software (Bio-Rad) and calculated by normalization to the reference signals of actin with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Pollen Grain Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
More than 500 pollen grains were photographed using SEM, and the aborted pollen grains were numbered. The relative fluorescence fold change of DiOC2 was quantified by measuring 80 pollen grains from 6 differential anther sections using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, United States). The relative fold change of pollen coat concentration was quantified by measuring 60 pollen grains from 20 differential TEM sections using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, United States). One-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance between different genotypes. Different lowercase letters above the brackets represent statistically significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of GHRH and GAPDH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue samples were collected from humans and mice for Western blot analysis using a previously described protocol4 (link),25 (link). Briefly, total proteins were extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Keygen Biotech, Nanjing, China). SDS-PAGE gels (5% stacking gel; 10% separating gel) were used to separate total protein lysates (40 μg per lane) and electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF) (Millipore Corporation, USA). PVDF membranes were incubated with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h at room temperature (RT) to prevent non-specific binding. Later, the membranes were incubated with rabbit anti-GHRH (1:500, catalog No: ab187512, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and anti-GAPDH (1:3,000, Proteintech, Wuhan, China) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The secondary antibody (peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:3,000, Proteintech, Wuhan, China) was incubated with the PVDF membranes for 1 h at RT on the next day. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Thermo, Marina, CA, USA) and a Fusion FX5 image analysis system (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France) were used to visualize the bands. Finally, Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) was used to measure the resulting optical density (OD) values, which were normalized to GAPDH expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total protein of cells or tissues were extracted and prepared for western blot. The BCA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was utilized to quantify the protein concentration. By the sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) electrophoresis, proteins were separated into different bands according to the molecular weight. Subsequently, proteins in different bands were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Then the membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h. Primary antibodies (anti-TGF-α, LC3B, p62, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved PARP, β-actin, with different concentration 1:500, 1:3000, 1:1000, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:500, respectivly, BOSTER, Wuhan, China) were incubated at 4˚C overnight. Next day, after membranes were washed with TBST buffer for three times, the corresponding secondary antibodies labelled with the HRP (BOSTER, Wuhan, China) were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Finally, the signaling was visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence and the relative concentrations were evaluated by Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis in ADSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADSCs were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China) after culture for 14 days. Total protein levels were quantified with a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Equal amounts of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibodies to runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) (1: 1000) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), osteopontin (OPN) (1: 1000) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and osteocalcin (OCN) (1: 500) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). GAPDH was used as the control. The blots were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and quantified with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Based on the RT-PCR results for IGF-1, Western blot was performed to evaluate the levels of proteins downstream of IGF-1, including, IGF-1R (1: 1000) Abcam, Cambridge, UK), phosphorylated (p) IGF-1R (1: 1000) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), AKT (1: 500) (Abcam Cambridge, UK), pAKT (1: 500) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), S6 (1: 10000) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and pS6 (1: 10000) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!