The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

47 protocols using glcnac

1

Candida albicans Morphological Transition Induction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C. albicans cells were grown in yeast extract/peptone/dextrose broth (YPD) made according to standard recipes [51 ]. Cells were inoculated from single colonies growing on YPD plates into 20 ml YPD and grown under shaking at 30°C until the culture attained an OD600 value of 2.00 A. Once the culture had reached OD600≈2.0 A, cells were harvested and then resuspended in fresh media at a concentration of 3×107 cells/ml (OD600≈1.26 A). For blastospore induction, cells from the original culture were resuspended in fresh YPD, transferred to a sterile flask, and then grown under shaking at 30°C for 3 hours. For hyphal induction, harvested cells were resuspended in either YPD + 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone) pre-warmed to 37°C (YPD + FBS) or YPD + N-acetylglucosamine at a concentration of 0.5 g/l GlcNAc (Sigma-Aldrich;YPD+GlcNAc), transferred into a fresh flask, and placed in an incubator with shaking at 37°C for 3 hours [11 (link), 12 (link), 42 (link), 43 (link), 52 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GlcNAc Uptake and Efflux in Rice Seedlings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rice seedlings were grown in ½ MS medium (described in supplementary information) and transferred to equilibration solution, containing 10 mM MES-KOH at pH 6; 1 mM CaCl2 (ES) for 1h. Four seedlings were pooled per sample and 3 replicates per genotype were used. Seedlings were moved to incubation solution (IS), consisting of ES; 3kBq/ml [3H]GlcNAc (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Saint Louis, MO). GlcNAc concentration was adjusted to 100 µM with cold GlcNAc (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK). For uptake experiments, roots were washed twice for 30 s with ice-cold washing solution (WS): ES; 100 µM GlcNAc (cold). For efflux experiments, roots were left for 2 h in IS, washed twice for 30 s with WS and transferred to a solution either lacking GlcNAc: ES, or supplemented with 50× GlcNAc: ES; 5 mM GlcNAc and incubated as indicated in results. To quantify [3H]GlcNAc content, roots were excised and placed in vials containing 3 ml of 0.1 N HCl for 1 h. Of the extracted fluid 1.6 ml was collected and [3H]GlcNAc was quantified by scintillation counting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enrichment of O-GlcNAc Proteins from ARPE-19 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pSBTet-AAK1-GFP WT ARPE-19 cells or WT ARPE-19 cells were seeded onto 10 cm dishes until 80 to 85% confluent. Then, cells were homogenized in 400 μl cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM PMSF, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 25 mM TMG). After a centrifugation step (10 min at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C), the supernatant was incubated in 150 μl of WGA Agarose from Vector Biolabs (catalog #: VECTAL10235) and INPUT samples were collected. The agarose-bound WGA was prewashed with PBS containing 0.2% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40). The WGA and protein lysate were incubated overnight at 4 °C under rotation. Then, supernatant fractions were collected, followed by washing of agarose beads with 0.2% NP-40 in PBS. The O-GlcNAc–modified proteins were eluted from the WGA agarose using 1 M GlcNAc (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.2% NP-40 in PBS at room temperature in Figure 4. After this, the samples were resolved by Western blotting, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bladder Cancer Cell Lines Protein Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bladder cancer cell lines including HT-1376, 5637, and T24, and normal uroepithelium cell line SV-HUC-1 were all purchased from ATCC (VA, USA). HT-1376 and were grown in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (No. 30–2003, ATCC, VA, USA). Five thousand six hundred and thirty-seven cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Biological Industries, Kibbutz BeitHaemek, Israel), T24 cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5a Medium (No. 30–2007, ATCC, VA, USA). The base medium for SV-HUC-1 cell line is ATCC-formulated F-12K Medium (No. 30–2004). The culture mediums for all cell lines contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, CA, USA), 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin. And cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator with air charge of 5% CO2.
Cell treated with 25 mM PuGNAc (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and 4 mM GlcNAc (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h to up-regulate O-GlcNAc level. Cells were treated with 0.1 mg/mL of Cycloheximide (Chx; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h to explore protein stability, all respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Single-cell Fluorescence in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown at 30°C overnight in rich media lacking a sugar source. This media, YEP, contained 10 g/L yeast extract and 20 g/L Bacto-peptone. This culture was diluted to an optical density (OD600) of approximately 0.05–0.2 and grown for an additional 6 hr in YEP media ± the indicated sugar (glucose, galactose or GlcNAc, all purchased from Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Single-cell fluorescence was measured on a LSRII analyzer (BD Biosciences). A blue (488 nm) laser was used to excite GFP and emission was detected using a 530/30 nm bandpass filter. A yellow-green laser (561 nm) was used to excite mCherry and emission was detected using a 610/20 nm bandpass filter. For each sample, 5,000–30,000 cells were measured and the mean fluorescence level was calculated. Each sample was measured three times; the mean of all three independent measurements is reported in Figures 1, 3 and 6. The errors in these figures refer to the standard error of the mean of these three measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolic Interactions of Gut Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. faecium JCM 30894 and P. succinatutens JCM 16074 (JCM, Ibaragi, Japan) were grown overnight in a peptone yeast extract medium supplemented with 80 mM sodium succinate (PYS) under anaerobic conditions 19 (link). The overnight culture of Phascolarctobacterium spp. was diluted 100-fold with PYS medium. In some experiments, 100 mM GlcNAc (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO) was added. For the growth assay on mucus medium, SPF WT C57BL/6 mice (some, but not all mice were littermates) were co-housed for over 2 weeks, and then randomly separated into two groups. One group was treated with αIL-22 antibody and the other with the control antibody. Colonic mucus was scraped from colonic walls into HEPES-Hank’s buffer (8.0 g/Ll NaCl, 0.4 g/l KCl, 0.05 g/l CaCl2・H2O, 0.35 g/l KH2PO4, 0.2 g/l MgSO4 • 7H2O, and 2.6 g/l HEPES, pH 7.4). Contaminating epithelial cells and membranes were removed by centrifugation, once at 12,000 g for 10 min, and once at 27,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Colonic mucus in HEPES-Hank’s buffer was stored at −80°C until further use 56 . 300 μg of colonic mucus scrape from the control and the αIL-22 antibody–treated mice were added to the PYS medium. Phascolarctobacterium spp. were cultured anaerobically for 24–48 h. Bacterial RNAs were purified and GH family gene expression was quantified by qPCR. The CFU count was determined by culturing samples on PYS agar plates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metabolic Interactions of Gut Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. faecium JCM 30894 and P. succinatutens JCM 16074 (JCM, Ibaragi, Japan) were grown overnight in a peptone yeast extract medium supplemented with 80 mM sodium succinate (PYS) under anaerobic conditions 19 (link). The overnight culture of Phascolarctobacterium spp. was diluted 100-fold with PYS medium. In some experiments, 100 mM GlcNAc (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO) was added. For the growth assay on mucus medium, SPF WT C57BL/6 mice (some, but not all mice were littermates) were co-housed for over 2 weeks, and then randomly separated into two groups. One group was treated with αIL-22 antibody and the other with the control antibody. Colonic mucus was scraped from colonic walls into HEPES-Hank’s buffer (8.0 g/Ll NaCl, 0.4 g/l KCl, 0.05 g/l CaCl2・H2O, 0.35 g/l KH2PO4, 0.2 g/l MgSO4 • 7H2O, and 2.6 g/l HEPES, pH 7.4). Contaminating epithelial cells and membranes were removed by centrifugation, once at 12,000 g for 10 min, and once at 27,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Colonic mucus in HEPES-Hank’s buffer was stored at −80°C until further use 56 . 300 μg of colonic mucus scrape from the control and the αIL-22 antibody–treated mice were added to the PYS medium. Phascolarctobacterium spp. were cultured anaerobically for 24–48 h. Bacterial RNAs were purified and GH family gene expression was quantified by qPCR. The CFU count was determined by culturing samples on PYS agar plates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Thermal Shift Assay for Glycan Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermal shift assays were performed using a Mini Opticon Real Time PCR machine (BioRad). 0.6 mg/mL protein in PBS was mixed with SYPRO Orange (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, #S5692) and glycan ligand (10 mM GalNAc; Carbosynth, #MA04390; 10 mM GlcNAc, Carbosynth, #MA00834; 10 mM blood group H type-2 tetrasaccharide; Elicityl, GLY032-2) in a total reaction volume of 25 µL. The temperature was raised by 1 °C/min from 25 to 100 °C, and fluorescence readings were taken at each step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chitin Content Quantification in Mycelia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chitin (N-acetylglucosamine, GlcNAc) content was analyzed as follows. First, mycelial samples were freeze-dried, and then 5 mg of the dried mycelia was resuspended in 1 mL of 6% KOH and heated at 80 °C for 90 min. The samples were centrifuged (16,000× g, 10 min), and the pellets were washed with PBS over three cycles of centrifugation and resuspension (16,000× g, 10 min) before the final suspension in 0.5 mL of McIlvaine’s buffer (pH 6). An aliquot of 100 mL (13 units) of Streptomyces plicatus chitinase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 16 h at 37 °C with gentle mixing; 100 mL samples were then combined with 100 mL of 0.27 M sodium borate (pH 9) and heated for 10 min at 100 °C with the final addition of 1 mL of freshly diluted (1:10) Ehrlich’s reagent (10 g of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 1.25 mL of HCl and 8.75 mL of glacial acetic acid). After incubation at 37 °C for 20 min, 1 mL of the sample was transferred to a 2.5 mL plastic cuvette (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany), and the absorbance at 585 nm was recorded. Standard curves were prepared with GlcNAc (Sigma). The experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Reducing Sugars in Chitinase-Producing Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolates carrying chitinase activity were cultured separately in 10-ml tubes with 5 ml of SSP broth containing 1% SSP. After incubation for 1 to 8 days, the culture broths were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min, and the supernatants were collected for the colorimetric measurement of reducing sugar by the modified method of Imoto and Yagishita (
1971 (link)) with GlcNAc (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) as a reference compound. Briefly, 1 ml of the color reagent was mixed with 200 μl of culture supernatant. The mixture was incubated in boiling water in an Eppendorf tube for 8 min. After cooling at room temperature, the absorbance of the mixture at 405 nm (A405) was read in a 96-well microplate using ELISA (BioTek EL800, USA). The decrease in A405 was employed to determine the reducing sugar using a standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!