The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using 7600 transmission electron microscope

1

Imaging and Identification of Lysosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For standard (2D) electron microscopy imaging, 80-nm sections were cut from the embedded sample blocks on a Reichert Ultracut-E microtome (Leica Microsystems, Vienna) using a diamond knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland) and were collected on uncoated 100- and 200- mesh copper grids (hexagonal or square meshes; Ted Pella, Redding, CA, USA). The sections were post-stained with 1% uranyl acetate (Canemco & Marivac, Gore, QC, Canada; pH not recorded) and Reynolds lead citrate (Fisher Scientific Company, USA; pH not recorded) for 12 and 6 minutes, respectively. Electron micrographs at various magnifications were obtained with a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies, Japan) at 80 kV.
Lysosomes in these images were identified according to their well established appearance and features: they are bound by a single lipid-bilayer membrane, with a granular, more or less uniform luminal matrix that is more electron dense than the surrounding cytosol. Secondary lysosomes may also contain less granular structures within the finer matrix. Moreover, lysosomes are normally distinguishable from endosomes by their larger size, hence we set a threshold “diameter” of > 200 nm for acceptance of a lysosome, below which all vesicles were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Purified EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified EVs were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde. A 20 μl drop of the suspension was loaded onto a formvar coated grid, negatively stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate, and examined under a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies, Schaumburg, IL) equipped with a Macrofire monochrome progressive scan CCD camera (Optronics, Goleta, CA) and AMTV image capture software (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Danvers, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Functionalized Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The OA-capped uSPIO, unpurified uSPIO-BP-PEG-NH2, filter-purified USPIO-OH-NH2, and three-round centrifuged uSPIO-BP-PEG-NH2, core sizes were measured with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). To prepare TEM grids, a concentration of 150−200 μg/mL Fe was used, followed by staining with 1% neutral phosphotungstic acid. Images were acquired at 400k magnification using a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope. Image analysis on all uSPIO constructs was performed using ImageJ-Fiji software. HD of water-soluble uSPIO-OH-NH2 was measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS). A concentration of 1.0 mg/mL of uSPIOs in PBS was used for measurement. Zeta potential was measured using a capillary zeta cell with a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL of uSPIOs in PBS, at pH = 7.0. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the OA-capped uSPIO, uSPIO-BP-PEG-NH2, and final ligand BP-PEG-NH2 were obtained using a Thermo Nicolet Nexus 670 FTIR spectrometer with an attenuated total reflection accessory. 2 mg of Fe or 4 mg of the ligand in 50 μL of water or ethanol droplets were used for sampling. Background was taken before each measurement and was subtracted to obtain final spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In vitro HIV-1 capsid assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro assembly reactions were performed by using methods developed in other studies (35 (link), 47 (link), 66 (link)) with some modifications. Briefly, CA protein, purified as described previously (26 (link)), was incubated at a concentration of 6 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5 to 8)–1 M NaCl for 15 to 30 min at room temperature and then overnight at 4°C. For negatively stained EM images, aliqouts of in vitro assembly reactions were placed on Formvar carbon-coated grids, incubated for 30 s, and then rinsed with water three times and stained with 2% uranyl formate for 30 s. Excess material was removed from the grids with Whatman filter paper. The images were collected using a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunogold Labeling of Phosphorylated Tau in Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BSCs were washed in PBS and then fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde/0.25% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 h and processed for pre-embedding immuno-electron microscopy as previously described [21 (link)]. In brief, BSCs were incubated in 0.1% sodium borohydrate in PBS for 10 min and blocked with a solution of 5% horse serum, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.2% cold water fish skin gelatin in PBS for 1 h. BSCs were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody—7F2 to tau phosphorylated at Thr205 [51 (link)]. BSCs were then incubated with biotinylated-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody and developed with diaminobenzidine using Vectastain ABC kit as previously reported [56 (link)]. Tissue was silver enhanced as described by Rodriguez [45 (link)] and then post-fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% osmium tetraoxide, and, following dehydration in graded EtOH, they were embedded in Epon. Ultrathin sections of BSCs were cut and then negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate and visualized with a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Atp7b Knockout Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChPl tissue was freshly isolated from the brain ventricles of 4 weeks old Atp7b-/- and wild type mice and fixed by immersion with EM grade 2% paraformaldehyde 1% glutaraldehyde 100 mM phosphate buffer (Sorenson’s) and 3 mM magnesium chloride pH 7.2 at 4°C. all subsequent steps were done at 4°C until 70% ethanol dehydration. Tissues were dissected carefully in fixative measuring no more than 2 mm3. Samples were rinsed in buffer containing 3% sucrose (3 X 15 min). Osmication was performed in 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide reduced 1% osmium tetroxide in 100 mM phosphate buffer, containing 3 mM magnesium chloride for 2 hrs at 4°C. Tissue was rinsed in 100 mM Maleate buffer (3 X 5 min) containing 3% sucrose, then en-bloc stained with 2% filtered uranyl acetate in the same buffer for 1 hr. Samples were dehydrated to 100% ethanol.
Propylene oxide (2 X 5 min) was used as a transition solvent, and the tissue was embedded with eponate 12 (Ted Pella, Redding CA) and finally cured in 60°C oven for 2 days, then sectioned to 60 nm using diamond microtome. EM images were collected using a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope operated at 80.0 kV. Images were acquired at 6,000 to 20,000 × direct magnification, corresponding to 0.010744 μm/pixel to 0.003223 μm/pixel, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles from Airway Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EV isolation and preparation from airway epithelial cell and macrophage conditioned media was performed as we previously described [20 (link)]. Briefly, conditioned media were collected 8 or 24 h post cigarette smoke exposure and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min to remove dead cells and cellular debris. The supernatant was then filtered with a 0.22- μ m Nalgene filter (Thermo Scientific). The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 30 min to remove any remaining debris and then ultra-centrifuged at 118,000 × g for 70 min at 4 °C with a fixed-angle rotor (Ti-70, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). The pellet was washed with sterile 1X PBS and subjected to another cycle of ultracentrifugation at 118,000 × g for 70 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded and the pelleted EVs were carefully reconstituted in sterile 1X PBS or lysed in RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA). EV concentration and characterization were determined using Nano Sight-based EV technology. EV morphology was characterized by imaging on a HITACHI 7600 transmission electron microscope equipped with AMTV600 camera at the University of Florida Transmission Electron Microscopy core [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Heart Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hearts of anesthetized mice were perfused with relaxing buffer (0.15% sucrose, 5% dextrose, 10 mM KCl in 1x PBS) for 3 min and then perfused with fixation buffer (1% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 100 mM sodium cacodylate pH 7.4), then fixed overnight in fixation buffer and post-fixed in 1% OsO4 for 2 h. Ultrathin sections of all tissues were counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead salts. Images were obtained using a 7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi) connected to a digital camera (AMT, Biosprint16).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification and Characterization of Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To purify virus, 30 ml of cell culture supernatant was overlaid on 4 ml of 20% sucrose in TNE buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) and 2 ml of 55% sucrose in TNE in an SW 28 tube (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA). Samples were spun for 3 h at 25 k RPM in an SW 28 rotor. Purified virus was collected from the 20%-55% sucrose interface, diluted with TNE and pelleted for 2 h at 55 k RPM in an SW 55Ti rotor. Pellets were resuspended in 40–60 μl TNE and kept on ice for immediate use.
Purified virus was treated with 8.0 × 10-3 g/ml of S. nigra extract or 0.8% ethanol as a vehicle control in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Samples were then spotted onto a glow discharged, carbon coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) and incubated for 2 min. Grids were rinsed with water, and stained for 1 min with 2% phosphotungstinic acid, pH 7.4. Samples were examined on a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope under 80 kV, and micrographs collected using AMT Image Capture Engine software controlling an AMT ER50 5 megapixel CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, for 1 hour at room temperature (RT) and transferred to 4°C. All wells were washed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide at RT for 1 hour, washed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and once with 0.1M sodium acetate buffer, stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate (UA) for 1 hour, and washed twice again with 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer. The wells were dehydrated through a series of graded ethanol twice each (35%, 50%, 70%, and 95%) and three times with 100%. All wells were infiltrated with 100% epoxy resin overnight and then washed with 100% resin for 10 minutes each time. Resin was polymerized for 72 hours at 55°C. The cells of interest were cut, trimmed with razor blade, and thin sectioned (70–90 nm) with a diamond knife using a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, http://www.leica-microsystems.com). Sections were stained (1:1 0.25% UA and 35% ethyl alcohol for 2 minutes and 1:1 5% lead citrate and H2O for 2 minutes), thinly carbon-coated in an Edwards carbon evaporator, and imaged using a Hitachi 7600 transmission electron microscope. Images were taken with an advanced microscopy techniques charge-coupled device camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!