The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using paper points

1

Standardized Dental Post Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the teeth in group 2 and 3 received 1.2 mm butt shoulder preparation with rounded inner angles. The preparations had a convergence of 6 degrees. The finish line of each preparation was at the CEJ. Post space was prepared to the depth of 10 mm from the CEJ, and an apical seal of 4 mm of gutta-percha was left untouched. A warm plugger (Sybron Dental Specialties, Romulus, Mi) was used to remove gutta-percha up to the decided depth. To enlarge the root canals a low-speed drill, provided the same manufacturer of the post system, was used. A final flush of sterile water to clean the canal space then paper points (Dentsply-Maillefer) were used to dry the canal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Root Canal Irrigation and Sealing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the preparation procedures are completed, each root canal was irrigated with 20 ml 1.5% NaOCl (Wizard) for 5 minutes and then was irrigated with 20 ml 17% EDTA (Nazar Chemistry Ltd, Istanbul, Turkey) based on the RET protocol of American Association of Endodontists (AAE) [9] . A 30 gauge needle with a side-vented was used for all irrigation of root canals (NaviTip; Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA). Root canals were dried with paper points (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, USA) after irrigation procedures were completed. The root ends were sealed with composite resin (Clearfill Majesty Esthetic, Okayama, Japan) using the incremental technique.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrasonic-Enhanced Root Canal Irrigation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
While activated using a smooth ultrasonic file (size #15 K-file, 0.02 taper) coupled to the file-holding adapter of a Satelec P5 Newtron XS ultrasonic system handpiece (Acteon Group, Merignac, France), 10 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was continuously delivered into the canal. The ultrasonic file was inserted into the 1 mm short of the WL without touching the walls, enabling it to vibrate freely. The irrigant was passively activated for 1.5 min at power setting 6 without engaging the file against the dentinal walls.
All irrigation procedures were applied with up and down motion to produce agitation and prevent binding or wedging of the needle. After the final irrigation, 5 mL of distilled water was used to remove any remaining NaOCl solution and the canals were then dried with paper points (Dentsply Maillefer). The orifice of each access cavity was sealed using a temporary filling material (Cavit-W, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) to prevent contamination of the root canal space during sectioning procedures. Two longitudinal grooves were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of each root using a fine diamond disc (Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA), avoiding penetration into the root canals. Each root was then split longitudinally into two halves using a hammer and chisel, thus, 20 specimens were obtained from each group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Root Canal Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty extracted human single-root premolars were selected after being radiographed buccolingually and mesiodistally. Inclusion criteria were as follows: single straight root canal, completely formed apex with patent foramina, no obstruction within canal system, and no evidence of internal and/or external resorption. Selected teeth were decoronated at 16 mm from the apex to standardize the length of all specimens. After pulp extirpation, size 10 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer) was introduced into the canal until it was visible at the apical foramen. True working length was established by subtracting 1.0 mm from this measurement. Root canal preparation was carried out using a modified step-down technique 22) . Coronal two-third was flared using Gates-Glidden drills sizes 4, 3, and 2 (Dentsply Maillefer). Apical third was prepared using K-files up to master apical file size 35, followed by stepback in 1-mm increments up to file size 60. Canals were irrigated between each file change with 3 mL of 5.25% NaOCl (Clorox (M) Industries, Malaysia). Final irrigation was done using 5 mL of 17% EDTA (SmearClear™, SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) for 3 min to eliminate the smear layer, followed by irrigation with 5 mL of distilled water and drying with paper points (Dentsply Maillefer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Standardized Root Canal Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty (50) single-rooted teeth were selected. Roots were sectioned at cementum-enamel junction, with a diamond disc (Dhpro, Paranaguá, PR, Brazil) under water-cooling. The working length (WL) was visually established, with a #10 hand instrument (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Jura-Nord Vaudois, Switzerland) that was inserted into the canal until its tip reached the apical foramen. The WL was determined 1 mm shorter to the apex. The root canals were prepared using the standardized K-files series (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Jura-Nord Vaudois, Switzerland), from a #10 K-file to a #60 K-file in the entire WL, to facilitate the LPS introduction and collection. At each change of instrument, the canals were flushed with 2 mL of NaOCl 1% (Biodinamica, Ibiporã, PR, Brazil). After preparation, canals were filled with EDTA 17% (Biodinamica, Ibiporã, PR, Brazil) for 3 minutes and irrigated with 5 mL of sterile saline solution. Canals were dried with paper points (Dentsply, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). Each sample was fixed in epoxy resin (Loctite, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) in a well, in 12-well cell culture plates (Kasvi, Curitiba, PR, Brazil).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Endodontic Root Canal Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One specialist in endodontics performed all the endodontic procedures. A 10 K-file was introduced into the canal until it was visible at the apical foramen and the length measured. The working length (WL) was calculated by subtracting 0.5 mm from this length. Root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), using a crown-down technique, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, up to the F4 instrument, which has an ISO 040 tip size, a 6% apical third taper, and then a progressively decreasing taper in the body. A size 10 K-file was inserted after each file to maintain apical patency. Canals were irrigated between each instrument with 0.5 mL of freshly prepared NaOCl 2.5%, and after instrumentation, with 10 mL EDTA 17% followed by 3 mL of 5.25% NaOCl for 3 minutes using a 30 G Navi Tip needle (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) and introduced 3 mm shorter than the WL (17 (link)). After all the procedures, each canal was irrigated with 10 mL of distilled water then dried using paper points (Dentsply Maillefer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Instrumentation of Immature Apices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Teeth were sectioned apically 12 mm below and coronally 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction using a diamond disk. Remnant pulpal soft tissue was removed using a size 30 Hedström file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) [Figure 1]. Working length was determined radiographically using size 20 K-files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and was kept 2 mm more than normal to over-instrument the canals simulating immature open apices. Rotary instrumentation was carried out using ProTaper rotary instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) to standardize to master apical size 30 corresponding to F-3. Next Peeso reamers (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were used sequentially from #1 to #5 to obtain larger canal space and foramen. The canals were irrigated with 2 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) between the instrument changes. A final flush was applied using 5 mL 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 1 min and 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl for 1 min and then dried using paper points (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bovine Incisor Root Canal Treatment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty bovine central incisor teeth were selected and sectioned
horizontally to standardize the root lengths at 17
mm. The working length was established at 16 mm. The root
canals were instrumented with using hand instrumentation
technique up to the #80 K- file, and they were prepared with
#1-6 Peeso reamer drills. At each instrument change, 2 mL of
1.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was used for irrigation.
After finishing the instrumentation protocol, 20 mL of 1.5%
NaOCl (5 min), 5 mL of distilled water, and 20 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic
(EDTA) (5 min) were applied to the
root canals. Then, the root canals were dried using paper
points (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Equal
portions of metronidazole (Eczacibasi, Istanbul, Turkey), ciprofloxacin
(Biofarma, Istanbul, Turkey), and minocycline (Ratiopharm,
Ulm, Germany) were used for the TAP preparation.
The medicament was prepared by mixing the powder with
distilled water (with a powder to liquid ratio of 1 mg/1 mL)and it was introduced into the root canals with a Lentulo spiral
at 900 rpm until the medicament extrusion was visible at
the apical foramen. The apical portions of the canals were
sealed with a flowable composite resin, and the access cavities
were temporarily sealed (Cavit G; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany).
The teeth were stored at 37 °C and 100% humidity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Post Space Preparation for Root Canals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The post space preparation of all roots was initiated after 7 days to allow the sealer to set. Post spaces were prepared to a depth of 10 mm with a special preparation drill (No. 3 FRC Postec Plus drill; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) which had a 1.0-mm diameter apically and a 0.02 taper. After post space preparation, the canals were irrigated using sterile water and dried with paper points (Dentsply Maillefer). The presence of any residual gutta-percha on the walls of the post space was evaluated by radiographic imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Reciproc All Root Canal Instrumentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were shaped with an R40 file (40/.06) (VDW) as recommended by the manufacturer with the “Reciproc All” program in the X-Smart Plus motor (Dentsply Sirona), with a sequence of three “in-and-out” motions combined with a lateral brushing action. After three pecking movements, the instrument was removed from the root canal and cleaned. The procedure was repeated until the file reached working length. Each file was used in one root canal.
After desobturation, the same final irrigation regimen as for primary root canal treatment was employed; finally, root canals were dried with paper points (Dentsply Maillefer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!