The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eclipse model e600 microscope

Manufactured by Nikon
Sourced in Japan

The Nikon Eclipse Model E600 is a microscope designed for laboratory use. It features high-quality optics and advanced illumination systems to provide clear, high-resolution images. The microscope is capable of a wide range of magnification levels to accommodate various sample types and research requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using eclipse model e600 microscope

1

Lung Histological Assessment Post-Lavage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following lung lavage, whole lungs were excised and slowly inflated (15 cm H2O pressure) with 10% formalin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 24 h to preserve pulmonary architecture as previously described [15 (link)]. Fixed lungs were processed, embedded in paraffin, and entire lung sections were cut (4-5 μm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Each slide was entirely reviewed at scanning magnifications (2X, 4X, and 10X objectives; Nikon Eclipse Model E600 microscope, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and semi-quantitatively assessed for the degree and distribution of lung inflammation by a pathologist (W.W.W.), blinded to the treatment conditions, utilizing a previously published scoring system [15 (link)]. This scoring system evaluates the spectrum of inflammatory changes for: 1) alveolar compartment inflammation, 2) bronchiolar compartment inflammation, and 3) intrapulmonary lymphoid aggregates and is compared to a standard set of photomicrographs. The bronchiolar compartment consists of inflammatory infiltrates in both the peri-bronchiolar and per-vascular space. Each parameter was independently assigned a value from 0 to 3, with a higher score indicating greater inflammatory changes in the lung.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lung Inflammation Scoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following lung lavage, whole lungs were excised and slowly inflated (20 cm H2O pressure) with 10% formalin (Sigma) for 24 hours to preserve pulmonary architecture as previously described [6 (link)]. Fixed lungs were processed, embedded in paraffin, and entire lung sections were cut (4–5 μm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Each slide was entirely reviewed at scanning magnifications (2X, 4X, and 10X objectives; Nikon Eclipse Model E600 microscope, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and semi-quantitatively assessed for the degree and distribution of lung inflammation by a pathologist (W.W.W.), blinded to the treatment conditions, utilizing a previously published scoring system [6 (link)]. This scoring system evaluates the spectrum of inflammatory changes for: 1) alveolar compartment inflammation, 2) bronchiolar compartment inflammation, and 3) intrapulmonary cellular aggregates. Each parameter was independently assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the greater the score, the greater the inflammatory changes in the lung.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lung Inflammation Scoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following lung lavage, whole lungs were excised and slowly inflated (20 cm H2O pressure) with 10% formalin (Sigma) for 24 hours to preserve pulmonary architecture as previously described [6 (link)]. Fixed lungs were processed, embedded in paraffin, and entire lung sections were cut (4–5 μm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Each slide was entirely reviewed at scanning magnifications (2X, 4X, and 10X objectives; Nikon Eclipse Model E600 microscope, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and semi-quantitatively assessed for the degree and distribution of lung inflammation by a pathologist (W.W.W.), blinded to the treatment conditions, utilizing a previously published scoring system [6 (link)]. This scoring system evaluates the spectrum of inflammatory changes for: 1) alveolar compartment inflammation, 2) bronchiolar compartment inflammation, and 3) intrapulmonary cellular aggregates. Each parameter was independently assigned a value from 0 to 3, and the greater the score, the greater the inflammatory changes in the lung.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Lung Tissue Preservation and Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After whole lung lavage, lungs were harvested, inflated with 1 ml 10% formalin, and hung under a pressure of 20 cmH2O for 1 day while submerged in 10% formalin for optimal preservation of lung parenchymal architecture as previously described (Poole, et al. 2014 (link)). Fixed lung tissues were standardly processed and embedded in paraffin, and sections (4–5 μM) cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Each slide was reviewed in entirety, using (2x, 4x, and 10x objectives; Nikon Eclipse Model E600 microscope, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and semi-quantitatively assessed for the degree and distribution of lung inflammation utilizing a previously published scoring system by a lung pathologist blinded to the treatment conditions (Poole, et al. 2009 (link)). The scoring system is a Likert scale (0–3) with higher values representing increased histopathologic inflammation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lung Inflammation Histological Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following lung lavage, the whole lungs were excised and slowly inflated (and hung under 20 cm H2O pressure) with 10% formalin (Sigma) for 24 hr. Next, by routine histology processing, the fixed lung tissue was embedded in paraffin and entire lung sections cut (4–5 µm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Each slide was entirely reviewed at scanning magnifications (2X, 4X, and 10X objectives; Nikon Eclipse Model E600 microscope, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and semi-quantitatively assessed for the degree and distribution of lung inflammation by a pathologist (W.W.W.), blinded to the treatment conditions, utilizing a previously published scoring system (Poole et al., 2009 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!