The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using ethylene bridged hybrid c18

1

Urine Peptide Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Labeled urine peptide samples were dissolved in 0.1% FA and separated with a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC before entering a Thermo Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (San Jose, CA). Each sample was injected twice. Mobile phase A consisted of water with 0.1% FA, and mobile phase B was composed of ACN with 0.1% FA. Samples were loaded onto a fabricated column with an integrated emitter. The 75 μm ID column was filled to a length of 15 cm using Ethylene Bridged Hybrid C18 packing material (1.7 μm, 130 Å, Waters). Peptides were trapped onto the column in 100% A and separated using a solvent gradient of 0–10% B over 0.5 min and then 10–30% B over 70 min at a flow rate of 350 nL/min. Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) parameters recorded MS scans in profile mode from m/z 380–1500 at a resolution of 35K. Automatic gain control (AGC) targets of 1 x 106 and maximum injection times (IT) of 100 ms were selected. The 15 most intense precursor ions were selected for MS2 higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation with an isolation width of 2.0 m/z and placed on an exclusion list for 40 s. Tandem mass spectra were acquired at a resolution of 17.5K in profile mode with an AGC target of 1 x 105, a maximum IT of 150 ms, a normalized collision energy (NCE) of 27, and a fixed lower mass at m/z 110.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Serum Metabolomic Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS-based serum metabolic profiling adopted a Vanquish™ Horizon UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Germering, Germany) coupled with a Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive™ Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer. The parameters of chromatography were as follows: column: Ethylene Bridged Hybrid C18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, USA); gradient mobile phase: (A) deionized water containing 0.1% formic acid, (B) acetonitrile/isopropanol (1:1, v/v) mixture containing 0.1% formic acid; flow rate: 0.4 mL/min; sample injection volume: 2 μL; column temperature: 40 °C. The mobile phase gradient was: 0–3 min, A: 95–80%; 3–9 min, A: 80–5%; 9–13 min, A: 5–5%; 13–13.1 min, A: 5–95%; 13.1–16 min, A: 95–95%. The conditions of MS included the scan ranges (M/Z): 70–1050; Sheath gas flow rate (psi): 40; Aus gas flow rate (psi): 10; Aus gas heater temp (°C): 400; Normalized collision energy (V): 20–40–60; and IonSpray Voltage Floating (V): positive mode (ESI+), +3500; negative mode (ESI), −2800. A QC sample was inserted for every 6 analytical samples during the experiment to evaluate the stability of the analytical system and assess the reliability of the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Metabolite Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS was performed on a Thermo UHPLC system equipped with a binary solvent delivery manager and a sample manager coupled to a Thermo Q Exactive Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, United States) equipped with an electrospray interface. The parameters of chromatography were as follows: column: Ethylene Bridged Hybrid C18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, United States); gradient mobile phase: (A) deionized water containing 0.1% formic acid, (B) acetonitrile/isopropanol (1:1, v/v) mixture containing 0.1% formic acid; flow rate: 0.4 ml/min; sample injection volume: 10 μL; column temperature: 40°C. The mobile phase gradient was: 0–3 min, A: 95–80%; 3–9 min, A: 80–5%; 9–13 min, A: 5–5%; 13–13.1 min, A: 5–95%; 13.1–16 min, A: 95–95%. The MS conditions included the scan ranges (M/Z): 70–1050; sheath gas flow rate (psi): 40; Aus gas flow rate (psi): 10; Aus gas heater temp (°C): 400; normalized collision energy (V): 20–40–60; and IonSpray Voltage Floating (V): positive mode (ESI+), +3500; negative mode (ESI), −2800. A QC sample was inserted every 6 analytical samples during the experiment to evaluate the stability of the analytical system and assess the reliability of the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Single-Cell LC-MS/MS Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS method used for single-cell analysis were described previously (17 (link)) with slight modifications. The SPE precolumn (100 μm i.d., 360 μm o.d., 4 cm long) was packed with 3-μm C18 packing material (300-Å pore size, Phenomenex, Torrence, CA) and LC column (50 μm i.d., 360 μm o.d., 30 cm long) were packed with 1.7 μm C18 particles (Bridged Ethylene-Hybrid C18, Waters, Milford, MA). The LC column was heated at 50 °C during separation. The flow rate of the LC separation was 100 nL/min using a nanoUPLC pump (Dionex UltiMate NCP-3200RS, Thermo Scientific). A linear 100-min gradient of 8–30% buffer B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) was used for the LC separation. Then the LC column was washed by ramping buffer B to 45% in 20 min and then keeping at 90% in 5 min, and finally re-equilibrated with 2% buffer B for another 10 min. A Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus was used for the MCF10A cells and an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer was employed for AML cells. The parameters for AGC and ion injection times were listed in the supplemental Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intact N-glycopeptide Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilized samples reconstituted in 0.1% FA were loaded onto a 15 cm length, 75 μm i.d. in-house packed Bridged Ethylene Hybrid C18 (1.7 μm, 130 Å, Waters) column, and analyzed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) interfaced with a Dionex UltiMate 3000 UPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Two technical replicates were run for each fraction. For intact N-glycopeptides analysis, binary buffers (A, 0.1% FA; B, 90% ACN, 0.1%FA) were used in LC and the linear gradient was from 0 to 30% B for 80 min. MS survey scans of peptides were acquired from 400 to 2000 m/z at a resolution of 120 K, using an AGC target setting of 4E5 and a maximum injection time of 100 ms. For MS2 scan, a duty cycle of 3s was set in top speed mode. Only spectra with a charge state among 2–7 were selected for fragmentation by stepped higher-energy collision dissociation (HCD) with normalized collision energy (NCE) of 30 ± 3%. The MS2 spectra were acquired with a resolution of 60 K, a lower mass limit of m/z 110, and dynamic exclusion of 12 s with 10 ppm mass tolerance. Different AGC settings and maximum injection times were tested for method optimization. All data were acquired in profile mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!