The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using transwell migration chambers

1

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WM1791C and WM209 cells were grown to confluence on 12-well plastic dishes and treated with miRNA mimics or siRNAs. Then 24 h after transfection, linear scratch wounds (in triplicate) were created on the confluent cell monolayers using a 200 μL pipette tip. To remove cells from the cell cycle prior to wounding, cells were maintained in serum-free medium. To visualize migrated cells and wound healing, images were taken at 0, 12, 24, 48 h. A total of ten areas were selected randomly from each well and the cells in three wells of each group were quantified.
For the invasion assays, after 24 h transfection, 1 × 105 WM1791C cells in serum-free media were seeded onto the transwell migration chambers (8 μm pore size; Millipore, Switzerland) which coated with the upper chamber of an insert coated with Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Media containing 20 % FBS were added to the lower chamber. After 24 h, the noninvading cells were removed with cotton wool, Invasive cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and counted using a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Experiments were independently repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Megakaryocyte Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Megakaryocyte migration assay was performed as described25 (link) in transwell migration chambers (8 μm, Millipore) coated or not with 25 μg/mL type I collagen, and cells were counted by flow cytometry.26 (link) Results were expressed as chemotaxis index (CI).27 (link),28 (link) For details see the Online Supplementary Appendix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown to 70–80% confluence in 12‐well plastic dishes and were treated with si‐HNF1A‐AS1 or si‐NC. Then, 24 hrs after transfection, for migration assays, 1 × 105 cells in serum free media were seeded in Transwell migration chambers (8 μm pore size; Millipore, Billerica, MA). For invasion assays, the upper chamber of these Transwell inserts was coated with Matrigel (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA ). Medium containing 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 24 hrs, the non‐migrated or non‐invading cells were removed with cotton wool. Migrated or invasive cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were fixed with methanol, stained with Giemsa stain (Sigma) and then were counted using a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 200× magnification. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Wound Healing and Invasion Assay for PC3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scratch wound healing model was conducted to check the migratory ability of PC3 cells following the transfection treatment. PC3 cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells in 2-well Lab-Tek Chamber Slide (Sigma-Aldrich). After overnight incubation, cells were transfected with mimics or miR-NC. Wounds were created in confluent cells using a 200 μL pipette tip. The cells were rinsed several times with media to remove any free-floating cells or debris and the speed of wound closure was monitored after 24 h by measuring the change in distance of the wound edges. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate and representative scrape lines were photographed using a phase contrast microscope (Leica). For the invasion assays, after 24 h transfection, 1 × 105 cells in serum-free media were seeded onto the transwell migration chambers (8 μm pore size, Millipore). The insert in the upper chamber was coated overnight with 1 mg·mL−1 BD Matrigel Matrix (BD Biosciences, Milan, Italy). A medium containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 24 h, the non-invading cells were removed with a cotton-tipped swab and cells at the bottom of the Matrigel were stained with May–Grunewald–Giemsa stain (Sigma-Aldrich). Stained cells were counted under a microscope (Leica) at 200X magnification in 5 random fields in each well. Experiments were independently repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transwell Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using Transwell migration chambers (8-μm pore size; Millipore, Boston, MA), cell migration was assessed. In the upper compartment of the invasion chamber filled with FBS-free culture medium, cells were seeded into the lower chamber containing 700 μl RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS as a chemoattractant. The cells remaining in the upper compartment were swabbed off by cotton swabs after incubation at 37°C for 48 h. Migrated cells were washed with PBS, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and counted by light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells were grown to confluence on 12-well plastic dishes and treated with miRNA mimics or Scramble. Then 24 hours after transfection, linear scratch wounds (in triplicate) were created on the confluent cell monolayers using a 200 μL pipette tip. To remove cells from the cell cycle prior to wounding, cells were maintained in serum-free medium. To visualize migrated cells and wound healing, images were taken at 0, 24, 48 hours. A total of ten areas were selected randomly from each well and the cells in three wells of each group were quantified.
For the invasion assays, after 24 hours transfection, 1 × 105 HGC-27or MGC-803 cells in serum-free media were seeded onto the transwell migration chambers (8 μm pore size; Millipore, Switzerland) which coated with the upper chamber of an insert coated with Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Media containing 20 % FBS were added to the lower chamber. After 24 hours, the noninvading cells were removed with cotton wool, Invasive cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and counted using a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Experiments were independently repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transwell Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were placed in the top chamber of transwell migration chambers (8 μm; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After 48 h, cells which had not migrated to the lower chamber were removed from the upper surface of the transwell membrane with a cotton swab. Migrating cells on the lower membrane surface were fixed, stained, photographed and counted using a microscope at ×100. Experiments were assayed in triplicate, and ≥5 fields were counted in each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating miRNA Effects on Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MG-63 cells were grown to confluence in 12-well plastic dishes and were treated with miRNA mimics, inhibitors or Scrambled. Then, 24 hours after transfection, linear scratch wounds (in triplicate) were created on the confluent cell monolayers using a 200 µL pipette tip. To remove cells from the cell cycle prior to wounding, cells were maintained in serum-free media. To visualize migrated cells and wound healing, images were taken at 0, 24 and 48 h. A total of ten areas were selected randomly from each well, and the cells in three wells from each group were quantified.
For these invasion assays, 24 hours after transfection, 1×105 cells in serum-free media were seeded in transwell migration chambers (8 µm pore size; Millipore, Zürich, Switzerland). The upper chamber of thesetranswell inserts was coated with Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Medium containing 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 24 hours, the non-invading cells were removed with cotton wool. Invasive cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and then were counted using a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transwell Migration Assay for Cell Competence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To estimate the competence of cell migration, cell transwell assays were designed, and executed principally with the application of the Transwell migration chambers (8 μm pore size, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). Firstly, cells were cultured on 6-well plates and transfected with miR-770-5p inhibitor/mimics, SRGAP1 siRNAs, MEG3 siRNAs, MEG3-overexpression lentivirus and negative control. Cells were suspended with serum-free medium, then in the upper chamber 100μl cell suspension was seeded, and in the lower chamber 600ul medium with 10% FBS. After incubated for 24 to 48 hours, cells were dyed with crystal violet staining solution (Beyotime, Nantong, China). We used Image-pro Plus 6.0 to photograph under 40×magnification (five views per well) and counted migrated cells while cell numbers of normal control were normalized to 1. Besides, CCK8 assay (Beyotime, Nantong, China) was applied to test the cell proliferation. The TECAN infinite M200 Multimode microplate reader (Tecan, Mechelen, Belgium) was used to measure the absorbance at 450 nm. All experiments were repeated three times independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Cell Migration and Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell transwell assay, which was designed to evaluate the capacity of cell migration, was mainly performed with the application of the Transwell migration chambers (8 μm pore size, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). Firstly, two cell lines were cultured in six-well plates and transfected with miR-206 inhibitor/mimics or SDPR siRNA. After 48 h of transfection, cells were harvested with serum-free medium as single-cell suspension and 100 μl of cell suspension was seeded in the upper chamber (1 × 106 cells/ml), along with the lower chamber filled with the 600 μl DMEM medium with 10% FBS. After incubation from 24 h to 48 h, the cells were stained with crystal violet staining solution (Beyotime, Nantong, China) after cell fixation in 95% methyl aldehyde. The images of migrated cells were captured and counted by Image-pro Plus 6.0 with the amount of normal control cells standardized to 1. Accompanied with the transwell assay, CCK8 assay was conducted to confirm the cell proliferation after 24 h transfection. Transfected cells were planted into 96-well plates and add CCK8 reagent into each well for 1 h incubation at 37°C, which was evaluated by 450 nm absorption measured by TECAN infinite M200 multimodemicroplate reader (Tecan, Mechelen, Belgium). Experiments of cell transwell and proliferation were performed in triplicate independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!