The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ptfe tubing

Manufactured by Cole-Parmer
Sourced in United States

PTFE tubing is a type of laboratory equipment used for fluid transport. It is made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), a chemically inert and thermally stable material. The tubing offers excellent resistance to a wide range of chemicals and solvents, making it suitable for various laboratory applications that require the transfer of corrosive or aggressive fluids.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using ptfe tubing

1

Microfluidic Device Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The red dye solution was prepared at 10% (v/v) by mixing red dye (Star Brand, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) with glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich). For visualization of fabricated microchannels, a solution of red dye was manually perfused using a syringe that was connected to sterile needles (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and PTFE tubing (Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL, USA) to fill the PDMS devices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microfluidic Devices for Monolith Polymerization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic devices (Figure 1A) were adapted from Bickham et al.19 (link) and designed to have five separated channels, each with a 50 μm × 45 μm cross section. Each channel had a reservoir on one side of the device and a port on the other side for PTFE tubing (0.22 in ID × 0.042 in OD; Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL) to connect to vacuum to flow analyte through the channel. A 600 μm wide monolith polymerization window (MPW), a region with fewer absorber-containing layers in the 3D print, was designed in each device to allow monolith polymerization.12 (link) 97% PEGDA, 2% NPS UV absorber, and 1% Irgacure 819 photoinitiator composed the resin used to fabricate the devices in a custom 3D printer.24 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hydrodynamic Trapping of Emulsion Droplets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
W/O droplets (50 μm) stabilized by f-Au@SiO2 were generated by a flow-focusing droplet generator, as detailed in our previous study20 (link). The as-produced droplets were then injected into the microfluidic traps at a volumetric flow rate of 0.5 μL/min for droplet trapping, followed by exchanging the continuous phase with pure HFE-7500 from a separate channel at a flow rate of 5 μL/min. Syringe pumps (Harvard Apparatus, USA) were used to control the volumetric flow rate, and PTFE tubing (Cole-Parmer, USA) was used as connections. The trapping efficiency was minimally interfered with by the flow rate (in a range of 0.5 to 10 μL/min) in the hydrodynamic traps, while the droplets were effectively trapped in the floating traps at a low flow rate (i.e., <1 μL/min) due to the relatively slow floating upward of droplets to the trapping zone. Excess droplets were flushed away after trapping at a flow rate of 20 μL/min. Once the droplets were trapped, the HFE-7500 oil remained flowing at a flow rate of 1 μL/min during the release process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microfluidic Device Fabrication via 3D Printing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microfluidic devices are designed in the freeware computer-aided design (CAD) software, OpenSCAD (openscad.org); each print has 10-μm-thick layers and includes five identical devices. The design is adapted from one used by Parker et al.25 (link) A 6-pixel (46 μm) by 5-layer (50 μm) channel connects a 2.7 mm diameter × 0.75 mm deep reservoir to a 1.1 mm diameter horizontal port, into which PTFE tubing (0.022 in ID × 0.042 in OD; Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL) is inserted for the application of vacuum for flow through the channel. The device also includes a 600 μm wide monolith polymerization window, placed 60 μm above the channel.25 (link) CAD designs of the devices can be seen in Figure 1AB.
Microfluidic devices were formed in a custom 3D printer with a 385 nm light source. The development of this printer and corresponding custom resin, consisting of 2% NPS and 1% Irgacure 819 in PEGDA, have been described previously.11 (link) The exposure time for each layer in the bulk material was 600 ms with 200 ms less exposure in the 3 pixels (~22 μm) to the side of and 3 layers (~30 μm) above the channel region to widen the channels (70 μm × 50 μm) beyond the designed size, as detailed previously by Beauchamp et al.35 All 3D prints were exposed with a measured optical irradiance of 21 mW·cm−2 in the image plane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fabricating a Reservoir with PDMS and PTFE Tubing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To fabricate the reservoir, two needles of 200 µm in diameter were inserted into a 0.5 mm thick piece of round PDMS mold with the diameter of a single well in a 48-well plate. The needles were placed such that they run perpendicular to the flat surface of the PDMS mold, and the PDMS/needles were placed into a single well of a 24-well plate. Unpolymerized PDMS was poured to fill the well, covered the PDMS mold, and left to cure at 60°C overnight.
The cured 24-well PDMS was removed using the fine-tipped weighing spoon as described earlier. The needles were removed, and the 0.5 mm thick 48-well PDMS mold was removed using the weighing spoon. The top half of the 24-well PDMS block was removed using a sharp blade. In total, two pieces of 150 mm long PTFE tubing (Cole-Palmer, Vernon Hills, IL, United States) were inserted into each of the channels created by the needles in the 24-well PDMS cylindrical block, and one of the tubings was threaded through one of the two channels such that a 30 mm length of tubing extends from the bottom end of the 24-well block. The other tubing was threaded through the second channel such that the end does not extend past the bottom opening (Supplementary Figure S1). The 24-well PDMS block with tubing was plugged into a capless 5 ml microfuge tube (Eppendorf) and sealed using PDMS. The reservoir was then heat sterilized at 121°C and 15 psi.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Printing Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophage Circuits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BMDM circuit was
printed using a modified, custom-made printer (iotaSciences Ltd, Oxford,
U.K.). The three-axis traverse on the printer holds a 25 G dispensing
needle (Adhesive Dispensing Ltd) connected by PTFE tubing (Cole-Parmer)
to a 250 μL glass syringe (Hamilton) controlled by a syringe
pump (iotaSciences Ltd). The dispensing needle was brought 300 μm
above the surface of the dish and then infused (10 μL/min) DMEM
+ 10% FBS + 10% L929 + 1% P/S + 2% fibronectin as it drew the circuit
[3]. Once completed, the circuit was overlaid with 2 mL of FC40 (iotaSciences
Ltd) to prevent evaporation. Circuits were printed on both 60 mm tissue
culture-treated dishes (Corning, 430166) and 60 mm suspension dishes
(Corning, 430589). As BMDMs are extremely adherent, suspension dishes
were used when cells were to be extracted (Figure S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microfluidic Device Fabrication and Cell Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic device was comprised of a molded poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS, General Electric RTV 650 Part A/B) slab bonded to a glass substrate. High-resolution printing (5080 dpi) was used to print the mask with the design pattern on a transparency film. The mask was used to fabricate 50 µm high SU-8 2050 photoresist (Microchem) features on a silicon wafer via photolithography. PDMS molds with embossed channels were fabricated using soft lithography by curing the pre-polymer on the silicon master for 2 hours at 70°C. The PDMS replica was then peeled off the silicon master. Inlets and outlets for the fluids and cells were created in PDMS using a steel punch. The surface of the PDMS replica and a clean glass coverslip (Fisher Scientific) were treated with air plasma for 90 seconds (Model PDC-001, Harrick Scientific) and irreversibly bonded to complete the device assembly (Figure S7). The device inlets were then connected to 1 mL syringes (BD Biosciences) with 23 G ¾ size needles (BD Biosciences) via PTFE tubing (Cole-Parmer). All syringes were calibrated and pushed by a constant pressure syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus). Prior to each experiment, the device was also loaded with fibronectin (25 µg/mL, Invitrogen) and kept at room temperature for 30 minutes to promote optimal cell adhesion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microfluidic Blood Plasma Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma was separated from whole blood by the sedimentation of the red blood cells (RBCs) in the trenches of the microfluidic devices. Before using, the devices were washed three times with IPA and twice with PBS. A syringe pump (Chemyx, Fusion Touch, version 1.7.6 c) was used to control the flow, using either positive or negative pressure, in the 1–15 µL min−1 range at a constant rate. In addition, 250 µL syringes (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA) were used to introduce the sample into the devices. PTFE tubing (0.22 in ID × 0.042 in OD, Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) and capillary tubing (polymicro flexible fused silica capillary tubing, ID 50 µm, OD 375 µm, Lisle, IL, USA) were fixed with UV-curable resin (DecorRom, Shenzhen, China) to connect the microfluidic devices to the syringe pump. The entire process is summarized in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

3D Printed PDMS Probe Tip Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 3D printer (Model uPrint SE Plus) was used to print the key component, a PDMS (Dow Corning) probe tip. The pen tips were fabricated by casting an elastomer from a negative mold designed using SolidWorks computer-aided design software and then dissolving the mold away. PTFE tubing (ID, 1/32 inch; outer diameter, 1/16 inch; Cole-Parmer) was directly inserted into the probe tip for experiments. For more information, see the Supplementary Materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Algae-based Nanoparticle Respiratory Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At various timepoints (1 h, 4 h, 12 h, and 48 h) before the study, male CD-1 mice were intratracheally inoculated with equivalent amounts of algae-NP-robot or static algae-NP. Then, mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and the trachea was exposed. A catheter made by tightly fitting a 23-gauge needle into PTFE tubing (Cole Parmer) was inserted into the trachea and secured with sutures. Bronchoalveolar lavage was then collected from each mouse by repeatedly washing the lungs five times with 1 ml of 0.5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 2 mM EDTA in PBS and immediately stored on ice. Cells were spun down at 700g for 5 min, and red blood cells were lysed using a commercial buffer (Biolegend) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, nonspecific binding on the cells was blocked with 1% (w/v) BSA in PBS for 15 min and then probed with Pacific Blue conjugated anti-mouse CD11c (N418, Biolegend) and PE-conjugated anti-mouse Siglec-F (S17007L, Biolegend) antibodies for 30 min on ice. Unbound antibodies were washed out twice with 1% BSA in PBS and the cells were resuspended in 1% BSA in PBS for flow cytometry analysis. Data was acquired with a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer and analyzed using the FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!