The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xenogen ivis 200 in vivo imaging system

Manufactured by PerkinElmer

The Xenogen-IVIS 200 is a non-invasive in vivo imaging system designed for small animal research. The system utilizes bioluminescence and fluorescence imaging to visualize and quantify biological processes in living subjects.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using xenogen ivis 200 in vivo imaging system

1

Investigating JAB1 and SB203580 in TNBC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animal studies were performed as previously described57 (link) and were approved by University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Briefly, luciferase-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells were transduced with lentiviral vector containing either scramble (control) or JAB1 shRNA. Transduced cells were then injected into 4th left mammary fat pad of 5-week-old female nude mice (Jackson Lab, Bar Harbor, ME) at 3 × 106 cells per mouse (5 mice each group) and tumor outgrowth was monitored weekly by measuring fluorescence in Xenogen IVIS-200 In Vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer Inc, Waltham, MA) for 4 weeks. In a parallel group, luciferase-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells were similarly injected. After 5 days of tumor cell injections, mice were randomized into two groups (5 per group) and treated daily with either vehicle or 1 µmol/kg of SB203580 i.p. for 4 weeks. Tumor growth were monitored weekly though Xenogen IVIS-200 In Vivo imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Xenograft Tongue Tumor Model in NSG Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Augusta University. Six-week-old NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). An orthotopic xenograft tongue tumor model was generated as we previously described [16 (link)]. Briefly, 1 × 105 luciferase containing HN12 cells carrying different ATAD3A gene modifications were suspended in 50 μl of PBS/Matrigel (3:1) and injected into the anterior ~ 1/3 tongue of NSG mice under anesthesia. Twenty-one days after cell implantation, mice were imaged for bioluminescent luciferase signal using a Xenogen IVIS-200 In Vivo Imaging System (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). For drug treatment, 7 days after receiving ATAD3A KO or parental HN12 cells, tumor-bearing NSG mice were treated with salirasib intraperitoneally once every other day for two consecutive weeks at 30 mg/kg body weight. The mice treated with an equal volume of vehicle (PBS) were used as control. When the experiment was terminated, the primary xenografts were excised and processed for standard histological analysis with H&E staining and IHC with antibodies against p-ERK1/2 and Ki67 as we previously described [29 (link), 30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Combinatorial Therapy Regulates Tumor Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four days after PC3 cell implantation, mice were randomized to receive control vehicle and drug(s) (n = 5). The treatment groups received followed equal volume treatment of CYT997 (20 mg/kg), dasatinib (10 mg/kg), or in combination of CYT997 (20 mg/kg) and dasatinib (10 mg/kg), respectively. CYT997 was administered by garage twice per day for a total of 3 weeks, and dasatinib was intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered 5 days per week for a total of 4 weeks. The control mice were injected i.p. with 100 μl sterile saline. Tumor growth was measured externally every 4 to 7 days using vernier calipers as length × width2 × 0.52. The mice were sacrificed on treatment day 42, and the lungs were removed and processed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) with Ki67 antibody and pathological analysis by HE staining as described previously [29 (link), 30 (link)]. For intracardiac models, mice were randomized for vehicle (sterile saline) or combined (20 mg/kg CYT997 with 10 mg/kg dasatinib) treatment. Mice were imaged for luciferase signal by an intraperitoneal injection of luciferin (15 μg in 100 μl PBS) every other week for 4 weeks using a Xenogen IVIS-200 In Vivo Imaging System (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preventing GVHD and Enhancing GVL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the ability of CD8+ iTregs in preventing GVHD, recipient mice were lethally irradiated at 700 cGy for BALB/c or 1,100 cGy for BDF1 (split dose). Irradiated mice were adoptively transferred with CD8+ iTregs 1 × 106 /mouse for BALB/c or 2 × 106 /mouse for BDF1 together with 5×106 TCD-BM from C57BL/6 (WT). Three days later, CD25-depleted T-cells (Teffs) from WT were injected to induced GVHD; 0.7×106 for BALB/c or 3×106 for BDF1. Recipient survival rate, GVHD clinical score, and body weight were followed for 80 days. To study in GVL model, MLL-AF9-GFP leukemic cells 2×104 /mouse or P815 mastocytoma 2.5–5 ×103/mouse were infused on the day of BMT. MLL-AF9 is a mixed lineage leukemia including myeloid leukemia expressing CD11b; therefore, MLL tumor growth was monitored in peripheral blood of recipient mice and determined for CD11b+GFP+ cells by flow cytometry (34 (link), 35 ). P815 growth was measured with bioluminescent imaging (BLI) using Xenogen-IVIS®200 in vivo Imaging System (Perkin-Elmer). Pacritinib (PAC) was administered at 100 mg/kg/day/mouse by oral gavage for 4 weeks. The mice were monitored for survival rate and tumor mortality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Graft-versus-Leukemia Assay in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recipient mice were lethally irradiated at 700 cGy for BALB/c and 1000-1200 cGy (2 split doses, 3-hour interval) for B6 or BDF1 recipient mice using an X-RAD 320 irradiator (Precision X-Ray). Lethally irradiated BALB/c, B6 or BDF1 mice were transplanted with BM from B6 or FVB donors with or without T cells at doses indicated. Recipient survival was monitored throughout the experiment. The development of GVHD was monitored twice per week for weight loss and once per week for clinical signs of posture, skin damage, hair loss, ruffled fur, diarrhea, and decreased activity (Nguyen et al., 2018a )( Cooke etal., 1996). To evaluate the GVL response, tumor cells were injected i.v. on the same day of transplantation. In case of luciferase transduced P815 (5000 cells/mouse), tumor burden was estimated with bioluminescent imaging (BLI) using Xenogen-IVIS 200 in vivo Imaging System (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA). MLL-AF9-GFP+ tumors were identified by measuring via the percentages of GFP+ cells in peripheral blood using flow cytometry. Recipient survival and GVHD severity demonstrated by recipient weight loss were monitored throughout experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Graft-versus-Leukemia Assay in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recipient mice were lethally irradiated at 700 cGy for BALB/c and 1000-1200 cGy (2 split doses, 3-hour interval) for B6 or BDF1 recipient mice using an X-RAD 320 irradiator (Precision X-Ray). Lethally irradiated BALB/c, B6 or BDF1 mice were transplanted with BM from B6 or FVB donors with or without T cells at doses indicated. Recipient survival was monitored throughout the experiment. The development of GVHD was monitored twice per week for weight loss and once per week for clinical signs of posture, skin damage, hair loss, ruffled fur, diarrhea, and decreased activity (Nguyen et al., 2018a )( Cooke etal., 1996). To evaluate the GVL response, tumor cells were injected i.v. on the same day of transplantation. In case of luciferase transduced P815 (5000 cells/mouse), tumor burden was estimated with bioluminescent imaging (BLI) using Xenogen-IVIS 200 in vivo Imaging System (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA). MLL-AF9-GFP+ tumors were identified by measuring via the percentages of GFP+ cells in peripheral blood using flow cytometry. Recipient survival and GVHD severity demonstrated by recipient weight loss were monitored throughout experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation with GVHD and GVL Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously describled (5 (link)), recipient mice were lethally irradiated at 700 cGy for BALB/c and 1000-1200 cGy (2 split doses, 3-hour interval) for B6 recipient mice using an X-RAD 320 irradiator (Precision X-Ray). Within 24 hours of irradiation, Balb/c or B6 recipient mice were transplanted with 5.0×106 T-cell depleted bone marrow cells (TCD-BM) from B6 or FVB donors with or without T cells (0.5-1×106/mouse). Recipient survival was monitored throughout the experiment. Body weight loss was monitored twice per week and clinical signs of GVHD were monitored once per week and include posture, skin damage, hair loss, ruffled fur, diarrhea, and decreased activity(5 (link)) (24 (link)). For GVL experiments, tumor cells were injected intravenously (i.v.) on the same day of transplantation. In cases of luciferase transduced acute myeloid leukemia C1498 (2000 cells/mouse), tumor burden was estimated with bioluminescent imaging (BLI) using Xenogen-IVIS 200 in vivo Imaging System (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA). MLL-AF9-GFP+ tumors were identified via the percentages of GFP+ cells in peripheral blood using flow cytometry. For human-to-mouse xenograft models, sublethally irradiated NSG-A2(+) mice were transplanted with HLA-A2(−) PBMCs (15×106). Recipient survival and GVHD severity demonstrated by recipient weight loss were monitored throughout experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!