The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lcq deca mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

The LCQ DECA mass spectrometer is an analytical instrument designed for the detection and identification of chemical compounds. It utilizes electrospray ionization (ESI) and ion trap technology to perform high-sensitivity mass analysis. The LCQ DECA is capable of operating in various scan modes and can be integrated with liquid chromatography (LC) systems for separation and analysis of complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using lcq deca mass spectrometer

1

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of BIM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was accomplished using a Finnigan LCQ-DECA mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA, USA), which was attached to a PDA detector. The BIM was dissolved in a mixture of H2O/MeOH followed by its direct injection into the HPLC/ESI-MS system. Negative ESI ionization ion mode was applied by adopting the following conditions: N2 was used as a drying and nebulizing gas; however the capillary temperature was kept at 250 °C. The spray voltage was 4.48 kV, the tube lens voltage was 10.00 V, and the capillary voltage was 39.6 V, however, a full scan mode was adjusted in mass range of m/z 100–2000 [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phytochemical Profiling of Olive Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phytochemical compounds in the olive leaves were identified using an Agilent 1200LC system coupled with a Thermo Finnigan LCQ DECA mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray source. Chromatographic separation was performed using a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Agilent Technologies, Savage, MD, USA) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The mobile phases were acetic acid (1%)/deionized water (mobile phase A) and acetic acid (1%)/acetonitrile (mobile phase B). The elution conditions were as follows: 0–11 min, 10–25% B; 11–16 min, 25–28.5% B; 16–40 min, 28.5–90% B; 40–50 min, 90% B; 50–55 min, 90–10% B; and 55–60 min, 10% B. The flow rate was 1 mL/min. Analyses were performed with scans from m/z 125 to 1200 Da in negative and positive ion modes. The peaks were identified using an Xcalibur Qual Browser by comparing the molecular ions, fragmentation, and relative retention times with the literature data and reference compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each 2D gel-spot that contained a DEP was excised. Protein was subjected to in-gel digestion with trypsin, purification of tryptic peptides with a Zip-TipC18 micro-column, followed by analysis with a Perseptive Biosytems MALDI-TOF Voyager DE-RP mass spectrometer (Framingham, MA, USA) and with an LCQDeca mass spectrometer (LC-ESI-Q-IT) equipped with a standard electrospray source (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). For MALDI-TOF MS, peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) data were generated; PMF data were used to identify protein with a search of the UniProt database with search software PeptIdent (http://us.expasy.org/tools/peptident.html) and Mascot (http://www.Matrixscience.com). For LC-ESI-Q-IT MS, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data were generated; MS/MS data were used to identify protein with a search of the UniProt and NCBInr databases with the SEQUEST software. Detailed experimental procedures were described [11 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Olive Leaf Phenolics by HPLC-DAD-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The contents of the identified phenolic compounds in the olive leaves were quantified using a HPLC-DAD-MS system. The polyphenols were separated using a Shimadzu LC-2030C HPLC system (Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm2, 5 μm, Agilent Technologies, Savage, MD, United States), and the mobile phases were 1% acetic acid in deionized water (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B). The following elution conditions were used: 0–11 min, 10%–25% B; 11–16 min, 25%–28.5% B; 16–40 min, 28.5%–90% B; 40–50 min, 90% B; 50–55 min, 90%–10% B; 55–60 min, 10% B, and the flow rate was 1 mL/min. A Thermo Finnigan LCQ DECA mass spectrometer, equipped with an electrospray source, was used for detection, and analyses were performed with scans from 125 to 1,200 m/z in negative and positive ion modes. The peaks were identified using an Xcalibur Qual browser, and the quality data and relative retention times of the identified phenolic compounds were compared by UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS. Then, the spectral peaks were quantitatively analyzed with LabSolutions HPLC software, using calibration curves of the corresponding standard or a compound that contained a similar aglycone (Supplementary Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron spray ionization mass (ESIMS) was recorded on an LCQ DECA mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, Bremen, Germany) coupled with an Agilent 1100 HPLC using photodiode array detector. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX-400 MHz Ultrashield spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA). CD3OD was used as a solvent, and TMS as the internal reference. Pre-coated thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates; Silica gel 60 F254 were purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh), Diaion HP-20, and polyamide 6 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for different column chromatographic procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Characterization of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A UV spectrum was accomplished utilizing a Hitachi-300 spectrometer (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation/Kyoto/Japan). An ESIMS was performed with a LCQ-DECA mass spectrometer (Thermo_Finnigan/Bremen/Germany). An HRESIMS was executed utilizing a Micromass_Qtof2 spectrometer (Bruker/Rheinstetten/Germany). NMR spectra were determined on BRUKER_AVANCE600 equipment (BioSpin-Bruker/Billerica/MA/USA). IR data were estimated with an Infrared-400 Shimadzu spectrophotometer (Shimadzu/Kyoto/Japan). A chromatographic investigation was carried out on SiO2 60 (0.04–0.063 mm)/Sephadex LH-20 (0.25–0.1 mm)/RP-18 (0.04–0.063 mm) (Merck/Darmstadt/Germany). Precoated SiO260_F254 TLC plates (0.2 mm, Merck/Darmstadt/Germany) were employed for TLC examination. The metabolites’ purification and detection were carried out by employing a LiChrolut_RP-18 6 mL solid-phase extraction tube and UV inspection at λmax 366 and 255 nm and then spraying with H2SO4: p-anisaldehyde and a 110 °C heating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Reversed Phase Peptide Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reversed phase separation of peptides was performed using a Surveyor liquid chromatography system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) as previously described 27 (link). Briefly, peptides were loaded onto desalting peptide trap (Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, CA) using an autosampler (Thermo Scientific). All MS analyses were performed using an LCQ Deca mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nanospray ionization source. Peptides were introduced into the mass spectrometer via a 75 μm ID/15 μm tip ID C18-packed PicoFrit®column (New Objective, Woburn, MA). The spray voltage was 2.0 kV and the heated capillary temperature was 200 °C. MS data was acquired using a top 3 data-dependent acquisition method with dynamic exclusion enabled. MS spectra was searched against a human database (downloaded on Nov. 29, 2007 from NCBI; 88,334 sequences) by using Sorcerer-SEQUEST (SageN Research, Milpitas, CA). The quality of peptide and protein assignments was assessed using PeptideProphet and ProteinProphet. Proteins with probabilities of ≥ 0.9 and ≥ 2 unique peptides were accepted as confidently identified peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Negative Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS analysis was performed on a Thermo LCQ Deca mass spectrometer. The experiments were performed using negative ionization mode with a spray voltage of 3 kV and a capillary temperature of 275 °C [33 (link)]. MS data were acquired and processed using Xcalibur 1.3 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analytical Characterization of Camptothecin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FT-IR spectra of the sample were assessed in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 with KBr discs, compared to authentic CPT. The extracted CPT samples were dissolved in CHCl3, and their structural identity was resolved by 1HNMR (JEOL, ECA-500II), the chemical shifts (δ-scale) and coupling constants (Hz) were expressed by ppm [13 (link), 14 (link), 29 (link)].
The chemical identity of the extracted CPT was resolved by LC–MS/MS (Thermo Scientific LCQ Deca mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray source) [11 (link), 13 (link), 14 (link), 22 (link), 29 (link)]. The ion trap was scanned from 300 to 2000 m/z, and the mass scan was recorded at 300 to 2000 Da. The structure of the compound was identified based on their mass spectral fragmentations and retention time by NIST mass spectral library [29 (link), 41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Techniques for Natural Product Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR experiments were carried out on a Bruker AVIII 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH company, Rheinstetten, Germany) (1H 600 MHz, 13C 150 MHz), with tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. Optical rotations were recorded with an MCP 300 (Anton Paar, Shanghai, China) polarimeter at 28 °C. UV spectra were measured on a PERSEE TU-1900 spectrophotometer. IR spectra were carried out on a Nicolet Nexus 670 spectrophotometer, in KBr discs. CD spectra were measured on a Chirascan™ CD spectrometer (Applied Photophysics, London, UK). ESIMS spectra were recorded on a Finnigan LCQ-DECA mass spectrometer, and HRESIMS spectra were recorded on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Q-TOF mass spectrometer. Column chromatography (CC) was performed on silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Factory, Qingdao, China) and Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech., Uppsala, Sweden). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel plates (Qingdao Huang Hai Chemical Group Co., Qingdao, China, G60, F-254). The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation was performed on a Varian Prostar 210 system equipped with a Prostar 320 UV detector on a preparative Hypersil C-18 BDS column (250 × 21.2 mm, L × ID, 5 μm Varian Dynamax, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). All other chemicals used were analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!