The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Herceptest 2

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Denmark

The HercepTest II is a qualitative immunohistochemical assay used to determine the HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) protein expression level in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue samples. The test provides information about the HER2 status of the tumor, which is important for guiding treatment decisions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using herceptest 2

1

HER2 Immunohistochemistry and FISH Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HER2 IHC was performed as described previously[18 (link)]. In brief, tumor specimens were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin overnight and embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections (4 μm) were cut from the tissue paraffin blocks, and IHC was performed using HercepTest II™ (Dako, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This process was conducted at the Department of Pathology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital. IHC sections were reviewed by experienced pathologists and were scored for HER2 expression according to the criteria used in the ToGA trial[1 (link)]. If tissue HER2 expression was scored as 2+, a further FISH assay was performed with Abbott-Vysis PathVysion™ (Abbott Laboratories, United States) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Tumor specimens with a HER2:CEP17 signal ratio ≥ 2.0 or 3+ IHC staining intensity were judged as HER2-positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunocytochemistry for Breast Cancer Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry (IHC) was performed using ER (1D5; Dako, Tokyo, Japan) and PgR (PgR636; Dako), Ki-67(MIB-1; Dako), PTEN (6H2.1; Dako) antibodies and HercepTest II (Dako) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The stained slides were reviewed by two observers without knowledge of the clinical data. Staining as scored semi quantitatively using a histoscore (H-score), which was calculated as staining intensity (scored as 0–3) x percentage of stained cells (0–100%) as previously described [19 (link)]. Because the scoring system for PTEN expression by using immunohistochemical methods are not standardized, PTEN H-scores less than 50 were considered as low in this analysis,[20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of MET, HGF/SF, and Proliferation Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine MET expression status by immunohistochemistry (IHC), monoclonal antibody (mAb) for MET, MET4 mAb,26 was used. Epitope sequence of MET4 revealed that DVLPEFR on amino acid residue 236–242 was the specific recognition site of MET. To retrieve MET antigen, tissue slide sections were treated at 98°C for 20 min in Target Retrieval Solution, pH9 (DAKO, Santa Clara, CA). ENVISION+ System (DAKO) was used for the secondary antibody reaction and DAB+ was used for color development. In the final step, the nuclei were lightly counterstained with Meyer hematoxylin.
Regarding the tissue staining of HGF/SF, anti‐HGF/SF mAb (clone 7‐2) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and the samples were stained according to the company's instruction. Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling the sample slides in the 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6) in a microwave for 7–10 min.
For the evaluation of Her2/neu IHC status HercepTest II (DAKO) was used. For the evaluation of tumor cell proliferation, we performed Ki‐67 staining using anti‐human Ki‐67 antibody (M7240, DAKO). E‐cadherin expression in the proliferative margin of tumor cells was also investigated using E‐cadherin antibody (H‐108, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized HER2 Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pathological examinations were performed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. For HER2 evaluation, specimens prepared at the surgical admission were used. The specimens were provided by the Biobank, in accordance with the National Cancer Research Center Biobank Specimen Usage Detailed Regulations. The specimens were assigned anonymized numbers and provided to two pathologists at the NCCH. The pathologists re-evaluated the specimens and determined the HER2 status according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 guidelines. HER2 status on representative tumor cut surfaces of surgical resection specimens was examined. Sections were stained using a HercepTest II (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), strictly following the manufacturer’s guidelines, or CB11 (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA). In IHC 2+ cases, HER2 FISH testing was performed using PathVysion (Abbott Molecular Inc., Des Plaines, Illinois, USA). For hormone receptors (ER and PgR), an Allred score of 2 or less was considered negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!