The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

99 protocols using dr3900

1

Characterization of Wastewater Substrate and Inoculum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wastewater sample (substrate) was collected from a biofiltration sample point of a local South African municipality wastewater treatment plant in the KwaZulu-Natal province. The activated sludge sampled from the anaerobic digester point source was used as the inoculum. An inoculum to substrate ratio of 3:5 (volume basis) was used for each 1 L bio-digester. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [43 ] were employed to characterise the substrate and inoculum in triplicates with the results shown in Table 2. Color and turbidity were analysed with the spectrophotometer (HACH DR3900, Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA) and turbidity meter (HACH 210, Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA), respectively. Using the COD high range vials (HACH), 0.2 mL of the samples were measured and poured into the COD vials. It was then digested at 150 °C for 2 h. After the digestion, the vials were cooled at room temperature and the COD was measured using the spectrophotometer (HACH DR3900, Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wastewater Characterization Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, all parameters such as pH, COD, turbidity, colour and TSS were measured according to APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater [38 ]. For pH and turbidity, a pH meter (Metrohm, Switzerland) and a turbidimeter (HACH 2100AN, USA) were used, respectively. The other parameters COD and colour were determined according to the Reactor Digestion Method (Method 8000) (HACH DR3900, USA) [39 (link),40 (link)] and the ADMI Weighted Ordinate Method (Method 10048) [41 (link)] (HACH DR3900, USA) while TSS was analysed using the Photometric Method for suspended solids in a liquid (Method 8006) [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biomass growth and nutrient consumption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biomass growth was monitored spectrophotometrically by absorbance at a wavelength of 660 nm (DR3900, Hach, Germany) 4–5 times a week (Supplementary Material 3), and gravimetrically by quantifying the concentration of volatile suspended solids (VSS) as described in experimental methods for wastewater treatment (van Loosdrecht et al., 2016 ). For the 40-h batch and SBR1, absorbance measurements were adequate since the biomass was low concentrated and in suspension. For SBR2 and SBR3, the biomass aggregated and VSS measurements were much more accurate.
The consumption of the dissolved nutrients was monitored by sampling the mixed liquor at the beginning and end of the reaction phase, after centrifugation (5 min, 17000 × g) and filtration of the supernatant on 0.45-μm filters (Millex-HV, PVDF, Germany). The concentrations of COD, ammonium (as N-NH4+) and orthophosphate (as P-PO43–) were measured by colorimetric assays (LCK kits no. 114/614/COD, 302/303/ammonium, 348/350/phosphate; Hach-Lange, Dusseldorf, Germany) followed by spectrophotometry (DR3900, Hach, Germany). The COD colorimetric method measured all oxidizable substances (here notably acetate, yeast extract, and EDTA from the trace element solution). As technical control, samples were measured in triplicates and the relative standard deviation was 0.5 – 1.9%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Polysaccharide Quantification in EPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polysaccharides were quantified following a method developed by [26 (link)]. In short, the freeze-dried EPS extracts were diluted in a sodium hydroxide solution (0.01 M in ultrapure water) to a final concentration of 1000 mg/L. For the standards, a sugar mixture of 1000 mg/L was prepared with equal amounts of fucose, rhamnose, galactose, glucose, xylose, mannose, and ribose. Sugars were selected due to their previous detection in bacterial EPS [27 (link)]. The sugar mixture was diluted to concentrations of 0, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 200 mg/L in order to establish the calibration curve. Then, 200 µL of each sample or standards were pipetted in a glass reaction tube, followed by 200 µL of 5% w/v phenol solution and 1000 µL of 95% sulfuric acid. Tubes were vortexed, left at room temperature for 20 min and vortexed again before analyses. The absorbance of the samples and standards were measured at 482 nm with a spectrophotometer (DR3900 Hach, Loveland, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wastewater Characterization and Biogas Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physicochemical characteristics of the wastewaters from the Organic Export Abattoir, HR and MR effluents were analyzed following standard methods (APHA 2017 ). TCOD, SCOD, TN, NH4+-N, TP, PO4− 3, S− 2, and SO4− 2 were analyzed following HACH instructions using a spectrophotometer (HACH DR/3900 HACH, Germany). Oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and pH were analyzed using a pH meter (JENWAY, Manchester, UK). Resistivity, salinity, electrical conductivity (EC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) were analyzed by multi-meter (EUTECH Instruments, Madrid, Spain). TS and VS were analyzed according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA 2017 ) using an oven at a temperature of 105°C and 550°C, respectively. TVFA and TotA were analyzed using titration according to (APHA 2017 ) standard method. Total biogas production was measured by sucking the biogas collected in 2-L glucose bag using a 100-mL airtight syringe. The biogas composition was measured using a gas analyzer (Geotechnical instrument gas analyzer, Leamington Spa, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The research team ensured that the collected samples are analyzed within the same day of collection. Chemical parameters were mainly measured using the combination of spectrophotometer (Hach DR3900, HACH/LANGE, Berlin, Germany), colorimeter (Hach DR900, HACH/LANGE, Berlin, Germany), with standard reagents as well as the test kits provided by Hach Company, [31 ]. The Standard Operating Procedure for GLNPO Turbidity (The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office, Washington, D.C.) was used for the analysis of turbidity [32 ], and the American Public Health Association (APHA) 4500-Nor, Washington, D.C., United States, was used for the analysis of total phosphorous, while lab pH-meter (Hach Co, HACH/LANGE, Berlin, Germany) was used for pH as well as the ultraviolet-visible (UV-V) spectrophotometer (PE-5400UV) pr-in ECOCHEMICAL, St. Petersburg, Russia was used for color measurements. The TSS in the samples was determined using Hach TSS portable hand-held turbidity meter. In general, the analyses of all the studied samples were accomplished following the recommendations in the APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater [33 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Wastewater Sludge Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH was quantified with a Hannah pH–meter (HI98130, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). A HACH 2100N turbidity meter (Hach Company, Colorado, CO, USA) HACH DR 3900 within the wavelength of 455–635 nm (Hach Company, Colorado, CO, USA) was used for the COD and TKN measurements. The sludge samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (SEM/EDX, FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 coupled with EDT and TLD detector) equipment based at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. The biogas composition analysis was carried out with a Geotech Biogas 5000 Portable Biogas Analyser (ISO17025) supplied by Keison Products, (Chelmsford Essex, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Wastewater-Dye Solution Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A stock solution of 2.5 M BB41 was prepared by diluting 30.16 g of the dye in 5 L deionized water coupled with 20 L of local wastewater [3 ]. HCl and NaOH were used for pH adjustment, measured with a Hannah pH—meter HI98130 (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). The main composition of the synthesized effluent was pH (7.55), COD (176.87 mg/L), color (54.8 Pt.Co) and turbidity (12.28 NTU). The COD and color was measured with a HACH DR 3900 (Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA), while turbidity was measured by using a HI 98703 Portable Turbidimeter (Hanna Instruments, Veneto, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

NTR1 and TNF-α Modulate Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression changes caused by NTR1 and TNF-α were analyzed using RT-qPCR. HAOBs (1×106) were pre-treated with or without 2.5 and 20 µmol/l of NTR1 and then placed into an inflammatory microenvironment induced by TNF-α. Total RNAs were extracted from the cells using TRIzol® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols, and then the concentration of the total RNAs was determined using UV spectrophotometer DR3900 (Hach). A TaqMan microRNA reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions to synthesize first-strand cDNAs. RT-qPCR was then performed with BlazeTaq™ SYBR Green RT-qPCR Mix 2.0 (BioCat GmbH) according to the manufacturer's protocols using PCR instrument CFX96 Touch (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), and the reaction system with 10 µl total volume was prepared. The conditions for RT-qPCR were 1 cycle of 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of at 95°C for 10 sec and at 60°C for 30 sec. The comparative cycle threshold method (2−ΔΔCq) was used to calculate the relative expression of each mRNA (22 (link)). The experiment was repeated three times. The primer sequences of the genes used in the experiment are listed in Table I.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Wastewater Characterization after Chlorination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wastewater samples were collected after chlorination process at a local wastewater treatment facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The samples were characterized according to APHA [34 ]. Table 1 shows the characterization of the wastewater used in this study. A turbidimeter (Hach, 2100N, Loveland, CO, USA) was used to analyse turbidity, while a spectrophotometer (HACH, DR 3900, Düsseldorf, Germany) was used to analyse color, phosphate, COD, TSS, and absorbance at a wavelength of 465 nm, 880 nm, 620 nm, 810 nm and 620 nm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!