The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

86 protocols using anti ha

1

Protein Expression and Co-IP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein expression analysis, total proteins were extracted from N. benthamiana tissues with buffer containing 150 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.15% NP-40, 0.1% Triton X-100 (pH 7.5), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), plant protease inhibitor cocktail (VWR), and 20 μM MG132. Protein samples were separated on 10% Bis-Tris PAGE gels, transferred electrophoretically to 0.45-μm Amersham Protran Premium nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare), and detected with anti-GFP (Takara), anti-HA, anti-FLAG, or anti-Myc (BioLegend) antibodies.
For co-IP assays, protein extracts were incubated with an anti-Myc antibody (1:2000, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C for 16 h followed by incubation at 4°C for 4 h with protein A/G magnetic beads (VWR) equilibrated with the extraction buffer. The beads were washed six times with 1 ml of extraction buffer, and immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed by western blotting with anti-HA, anti-FLAG, or anti-Myc (BioLegend) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation of Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Logarithmically growing cells were collected and frozen at −80 °C. Pellets were resuspended in the same volume of HB buffer (50 mM HEPES/KOH at pH 7.5, 140 mM NaCl, 15 mM EGTA, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1% NP-40, 0.5 mM Na3VO4) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM PMSF, 0.1% protein inhibitor cocktail set III (Sigma), 0.1 ng mL−1 MG132 (Sigma), 10 U mL−1 TURBO DNase (Ambion)). Cells were broken using a Fast Prep machine (Thermo), briefly sonicated using the Biorupter and centrifuged to collect the chromatin containing cell extract. Monoclonal anti-Myc 9E11 (2276, Cell Signalling) and anti-HA antibodies (901514, Covance/BioLegend) were used for pull down and detection of Myc and HA tagged proteins, respectively. Antibodies were conjugated with mouse IgG-coated Dynabeads (Life Technologies) overnight. Whole-cell extracts (WCEs) were incubated with the pre-coated beads for 1 h at 4 ˚C, washed, and then resuspended in SDS loading buffer and boiled. Samples were subjected to western blotting with anti-HA (1:1000), anti-Myc (1:5000), or anti-PK (1:4000, anti-V5 SV5-Pk2, MCA2892, Covance/Bio-Rad) antibodies. Anti-Cdc2 (sc-53, Santa Cruz) was used as a control (1:5000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting for Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as previously described.19, 20 Primary antibodies used in this study include the following: anti–α‐tubulin (Yeasen), anti‐FLAG (Sigma), anti‐NLRP3 (AdipoGen), anti‐ASC (AdipoGen), anti–caspase‐1 (AdipoGen), anti–IL‐1β (R&D Systems), anti‐HA (BioLegend), anti‐ubiquitin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti‐GAPDH (Yeasen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Lysis and Immunoblotting Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in 6-well culture plates and harvested at 80% confluence to prepare whole-cell lysates using modified RIPA buffer containing Triton X-100 [24 (link)]. The spheroids cultured in the 3D collagen type I environment were harvested as described in a previous report [28 (link)]. Primary antibodies used for immunoblotting were as follows: phospho-Y416 Src, (Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA); c-Src (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); FAK, phospho-Y397FAK (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA); anti-HA (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunogold Labeling and EM Analysis of GFP-LC3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunogold labeling and EM analysis of GFP‐LC3 stable U2OS cells transiently transfected with HA‐Rab7b were performed as described in 44. For double labeling, sections were first labeled with rabbit anti‐GFP (Abcam) at 1:100 and protein A gold 5 nm (Cell Microscopy Center, UMC) at 1:50, followed by anti‐HA (Biolegend) at 1:50 and protein A gold 10 nm (Cell Microscopy Center, UMC) at 1:50. Sections were analyzed with a JEM‐1400 TEM microscope (Jeol), and images were recorded with TemCam‐F216 camera using EM MENU software (both from Tvips).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kc167 cells were collected, washed in PBS and incubated for 30 min in IP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 1mM EGTA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The extracts were cleared by centrifugation at 13.000g for 15 min at 4°C and subjected to SDS-PAGE (50 μg of proteins par lane) or immunoprecipitation (1 mg per point). For immunoprecipitation, proteins were preadsorbed with 100 μl of sepharose beads slurry for 1h at 4°C before being incubated with 20 μl of anti-GFP (Chromotek), anti-V5 (Sigma-Aldrich) or anti-HA (Covance) antibody coupled to sepharose beads, or with 10 μl of rabbit anti-MLF [19 (link)] or rabbit IgG (SantaCruz) in the presence of 20 μl of protein A sepharose beads (Sigma), for 4h at 4°C. The beads were spun down and washed in IP buffer and immunoprecipitated proteins were processed for SDS-PAGE and Western Blot analyses. Western blots were performed using standard techniques and the blots were developed by photoluminescence procedure using Lumi-LightPLUS Western Blotting Substrate (Roche) and Amersham HyperfilmTM ECL (GE Healthcare) or Chemidoc Touch Imaging System (BioRad). The following antibodies were used for Western blots: anti-V5 (Invitrogen), anti-HA (BioLegend), anti-GFP, anti-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-Renilla luciferase (MBL), and anti-MLF [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Purification and Analysis Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard methods were used for the preparation and ligation of DNA fragments and for transformation and recovery of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli [44 ]. Yeast was transformed by the LiAc procedure of Schiestl and Gietz [45 (link)]. Proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE [42 (link)]. Western blots were treated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against anti F1-β (a gift from Dr. Alexander Tzagoloff), anti-Atp6 (a gift from Dr. Jean-Paul di Rago and Dr. Marie-France Giraud), anti-HA (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and VDAC1 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The blots were then followed by a second reaction with peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit IgG. The antibody complexes were visualized with the super signal chemiluminescent substrate kit (Pierce Chemical, Dallas, TX, USA). The protein concentrations were determined by the method of Lowry et al. [40 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors for 30 min on ice, followed by centrifugation at 15000 × g for 30 min. After SDS-PAGE, extracted proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare) and probed with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, and the bands were captured through an ECL HRP substrate (Millipore). Anti-PRMT5 (Abcam, ab109451), anti-CDK4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-260), anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, #4967), anti-β-tubulin (Cell Signaling Technology, #2146), anti-Flag M2 (Sigma-Aldrich, F3165), anti-HA (Biolegend, 901503), anti-6× His (Proteintech, 66005-1-Ig), anti-pRB S780 (Abcam, ab47763), anti-Mono-Methyl Arginine (Cell Signaling Technology, #8015) and anti-SDMA (Millipore, 07-413), anti-CCNE1 (Proteintech, 11554-1-AP), anti-CDC6 (Proteintech, 11640-1-AP) antibodies were purchased.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in six‐well plates to 80% confluency and harvested. Cell pellet was snap frozen and lysed in 100 μl lysis buffer (0.5% NP40, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 400 nM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail). The cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation (15,000 g for 20 min), boiled for 5 min after the addition of 3× Laemmli sample buffer, loaded on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis‐Tris SDS–PAGE gels (Invitrogen) for gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Trans‐Blot Turbo, BioRad). The following primary antibodies were used: anti‐PTPN14 (#13808, Cell Signaling), anti‐actin (#179467, Abcam), anti‐YAP1 (#15407, Santa Cruz), anti‐YAP1phosphoS127 (#4911, Cell Signaling), and anti‐HA (HA.11,901513, BioLegend). Proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham) using horseradish‐peroxidase‐coupled secondary antibodies (Rabbit #7074, Cell Signaling and Mouse #115035003, Jackson ImmunoResearch).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody and Inhibitor Usage in Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used in this study were as follows: anti-phospho-c-Fos (pSer374) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-c-Fos (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (pThr202/pTyr204; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-HA (Biolegend), anti-GAPDH (Millipore), anti-β-actin (Millipore), horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Abcam), and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse IgG H&L (Abcam). ERK1/2 inhibitor (SCH772984">SCH772984; TargetMol) and competitive P2X7R antagonist (A 438079; Abcam) were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma–Aldrich) and stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!