The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Waters 996 photodiode array detector

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States, Japan

The Waters 996 photodiode array detector is a versatile analytical instrument designed for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) applications. It provides simultaneous detection of multiple wavelengths, allowing for the analysis of complex samples with enhanced selectivity and sensitivity.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

52 protocols using waters 996 photodiode array detector

1

Analysis of Flavonoid Aglycones in Lentils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acid hydrolysis of the lentil samples was performed for the HPLC analysis of flavonoid aglycones according to a previous study, with minor modifications [19 (link)]. Briefly, 30 mg of lentil samples were mixed with 1 mL of 1.2 M HCl diluted with 50% aqueous methanol, and incubated at 90 °C for 2 h. Then, the mixtures were cooled in ice and were centrifuged at 12,800× g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered using a 0.45 μm PTFE filter (Futecs Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea) for HPLC analysis. Individual phenolic compounds analysis was performed with reversed-phase HPLC (Waters 2695 Alliance HPLC, Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA) with an octadecylsilane column (Prontosil 120-5-C18 SH (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm), Bischoff, Leonberg, Germany). The gradient elution of mobile phases (0.1% formic acid in water and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) followed the previously described method [19 (link)]. The injection volume was 10 μL. The flow rate was maintained at 1 mL/min. Peaks were detected at 360 nm using a Waters 996 photodiode array detector (Waters Inc.). Individual phenolics in lentil samples were quantified with kaempferol standard (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dialysis-based Loading Capacity Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Loading capacity was determined by using a Dialysis tubing cellulose membrane (sigma-Aldrich, Massachusetts, USA) against PBS by adding 2 ml of the mixture after probe-sonication into a cellulose dialysis sac bag that was cut off by scissors then the dialysis bag was sealed properly both from top and bottom and inserted into PBS 7.4 with 50 rpm using a shaking incubator at the room temperature. After 0.5h, the media was collected and replaced with new PBS for another 0.5h. Then the media collected and standard dilutions were filtered by syringe and tested using a Waters 2690 Alliance HPLC system equipped with a Waters 996 photodiode array detector. Standard preparation: Weight 1 mg of each standard to obtain stock solution then serial dilution to obtain conc. of (100,80,60,40,20,10 µg/ml) then filtrated using a 0.22 syringe filter and injected 10 µl. Sample preparation: 1) The sample is then filtrated using a 0.22 syringe filter and injected 10 µl. HPLC analysis conditions were: Column Kromasil C8: 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm, Mobile phase: 0.1% Formic acid in water: Acetonitrile, Mode of elution: isocratic, Flow rate: 1ml/min, Temperature: Ambient, Wavelength: 254 nm22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of L-dopa in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One milliliter of sample solution (2 mg/mL for leaves; 10 mg/mL for seeds) after filtration through a 0.45-μm membrane filter (Futecs Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Korea) was analyzed by gradient elution on an octadecylsilane column (Prontosil 120-5-C18-SH 5.0 μm (250 × 4.6 mm), Bischoff, Leonberg, Germany) with a Waters 2695 Alliance HPLC (Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA). An injection volume of 5 μL and a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min were used. The mobile phases were solvent A (0.3% formic acid in water) and solvent B (0.3% formic acid in acetonitrile) with a linear gradient as follows: 0–9 min, 2% B; 9–10 min, 2–80% B; 10–14 min, 80% B; 14–16 min, 80–2% B; and 16–20 min, 2% B. The peak of L-dopa was detected at 280 nm by a Waters 996 photodiode array detector (Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromatographic Analysis of Conifer Needle Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical components in the needle extracts of the two conifers were analyzed using reversed-phase HPLC (Waters 2695 Alliance HPLC; Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA), coupled with a 250 × 4.6 mm octadecylsilane column (Prontosil 120-5-C18-SH 5.0 μm; Bischoff, Leonberg, Germany). Two solvents were used as mobile phases; water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and MeOH with 0.1% formic acid (solvent B). The gradient flow was as follows: 0–5% of solvent B for 0–10 min, 5–10% of solvent B for 10–20 min, 10–20% of solvent B for 20–30 min, 20–40% of solvent B for 30–50 min, and 40–70% of solvent B for 50–62 min. Furthermore, the flow rate of the mobile phases was 1.0 mL min−1, and the sample injection volume was 5 μL. Then, resulting peaks were monitored at 278 nm using a Waters 996 photodiode array detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Ethanolic Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 0.2 mL of the sample extract was diluted with 0.8 mL of 80% ethanol. The diluted extract was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter. The filtrate was analyzed using reverse-phase HPLC (Waters 2695 Alliance HPLC; Bischoff, Leonberg, Germany) with a prontosil column (120-5-C18-SH, 5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm; Bischoff, Leonberg, Germany) as previously described methods [18 (link),24 (link)]. The mobile phase consisted of (A) water with 0.1% formic acid and (B) acetonitrile. The gradient elution was as follows: 0–23 min, 1–20% B; 23–45 min, 20–60% B; 45–46 min, 60% B; 46–47 min, 60–1% B; and 47–49 min, 1% B. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1.0 mL·min−1 and the injection volume of the sample was 10 μL. The peaks were detected at 280 nm using the Waters 996 photodiode array detector (Waters Inc., Milford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Histone H1 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various wild-type mouse tissues and embryos were generously provided by members of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Other tissues were recovered from wild-type, H1cTKO, and H1cTKO;Vav-iCre mice. Histone proteins were isolated by extraction with 0.2 N sulfuric acid, as previously described37 (link),38 (link). Samples were analysed by electrophoresis through a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and protein was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Otherwise, samples were applied to a Vydac 218TP C18 HPLC column using the Waters 2695 Separations Module. The effluent was monitored and peaks recorded using the Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector at 214 nm. H1 peak areas were determined using the Waters Empower Pro software (v.2) and normalized to H2B peaks. For the wild-type tissue, data were analysed in the R statistical environment by unsupervised clustering using the pheatmap package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Gliclazide in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma concentrations of gliclazide were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric (HPLC LC/MS) assay.13 (link) The method was referenced to the Bioanalytical Method Guidance as stated in the United States Food and Drug Administration. The calibration standards and quality control samples were prepared by spiking known amounts of gliclazide in drug-free plasma. The HPLC system consisted of a Waters Alliance 2690 separation module, Millenium chromatography management system and Waters 996 photodiode array detector (Waters, Milford, Mass).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical rotations were obtained using a Jasco P-1020 polarimeter (Jasco, USA). The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained using a Varian UNITY INOVA 800 NMR spectrometer operating at 800 MHz (1H) and 200 MHz (13C), with chemical shifts given in ppm (δ). Preparative HPLC was performed using a Waters 1525 Binary HPLC pump with a Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector (Waters Corporation, USA). Semi-preparative HPLC was conducted using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC System with SPD-20A/20AV Series Prominence HPLC UV-Vis Detectors (Shimadzu, Japan). LC/MS analysis was carried out on an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC System (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a diode array detector and a 6130 Series ESI mass spectrometer by using an analytical Kinetex column (4.6 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm). Precoated Merck silica gel F254 plates and RP-18 F254s plates were used for thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Spots were detected by TLC under UV light or by heating after spraying with anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Walnut Protein Molecular Weight Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular weight distribution was determined by High performance size exclusion chromatography (SEC-HPLC, Waters Chromatography Division, Milford, MA, USA). Four walnut proteins (5 mg/mL) were extracted by sodium phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 8.0) containing sodium chloride (0.3 M) for 4 h at 25 °C under constant magnetic stirring and then were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min (25 °C). The supernatant was filtered through a cellulose acetate membrane with a pore size of 0.45 μm (Sartorius Co., Ltd., Gottingen, Germany). A Waters 2690 liquid chromatogram system (Waters Chromatography Division, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a Shodex protein KW-804 column (Shodex Separation and HPLC Group, Tokyo, Japan) and a Waters 996 photodiode array detector were used to determine the molecular weight distribution. The flow rate was 1 mL/min using phosphate buffer (0.05 mol/L, 0.3 mol/L NaCl, pH 7.0) as the mobile phase. About 10 μL protein solutions were injected into the column and the eluent was monitored at 280 nm. All samples were measured in triplicate and the representative examples were selected for discussion. A calibration curve of 10 standard proteins was used for interpreting the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Propranolol by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of propranolol in all samples was quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Waters liquid chromatograph (Waters 600 Controller and Pump) which included a diode-array detector (Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector) (Waters, Barcelona, Spain), set to 291 nm and an analytical Kromasil® C18 column (250 × 4 mm, 5 µm) (Análisis Vínicos, Tomelloso, Spain). A mixture of monobasic ammonium phosphate water solution (0.05 M, pH 3.7)-acetonitrile (69:40, v/v) was used as mobile phase, at a flow rate of 1 mL/min injection volume was 50 µL. The method had been previously validated [31 (link)]. The limits of detection and of quantification were 0.171 and 0.115 µM, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!