The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mlct cantilever

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in United States, Germany

The MLCT cantilevers are high-performance atomic force microscope (AFM) probes designed and manufactured by Bruker. They are optimized for force spectroscopy and topography measurements in liquid environments. The cantilevers feature a silicon nitride tip and are available in a range of spring constants to accommodate various sample properties and application requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using mlct cantilever

1

Multistep Unfolding of βMT Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed using a ForceRobot300 (JPK) atomic force microscope. The MLCT cantilever (Bruker Corp.) was calibrated in the solution using the equipartition theorem, and a spring constant of ~50 pN·nm−1 was usually obtained. All experiments were performed at room temperature in a Tris buffer of pH 7.4. The protein solution was first absorbed onto a glass coverslip and then was subjected to experiments after 10 minutes of incubation. The tip contacts the surface for hundreds of milliseconds and then retracts at a constant velocity. The pulling velocities for experiments were 400 nm·s−1 and 1000 nm·s−1, respectively. To ensure the data is from the real multistep unfolding events of βMT, not due to the background noise, only force-extension curves with stepwise rupture peaks whose cumulative ΔLc is ~8 nm (between 7 nm to 10 nm) were selected for further analysis. At least the ΔLc of one force peak is larger than 3 nm. Statistically, ~50 out of 1000 (~5%, 400 nm·s−1 condition) βMT unfolding curve showed such multistep unfolding events.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Cell Mechanics with AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adherent cells were cultured on 70% ethanol-cleaned glass slides in 6-wells culture plates, rinsed to remove unbound cells and fragments and mounted in a temperature-controlled chamber (Biocell, JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) set to 37 °C. Cells were indented with a JPK Nanowizard 1 AFM (JPK Instruments), using the force mode with a closed loop 15 μm range piezo. The AFM sits on an Axiovert 200 microscope equipped with a Colibri 2 diode illumination system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and a CoolSnap HQ2 camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA). A glass sphere of diameter 10 μm was glued by micromanipulation (using a homemade micropipette/biomembrane force probe setup) to a gold-coated triangle-shaped MLCT cantilever (Bruker Instruments, Billerica, MA, USA), using UV polymerizable glue (Dymax OP-29) in order to measure cell mechanics on similar scales as in the microindentation experiments. The decorated AFM cantilever was calibrated in situ prior to the experiments using the thermal noise method implemented in the JPK SPM control software and found to be 11.5 nN/μm, compatible with the nominal data provided by the manufacturer (10 nN/μm). The approach and retract speeds of the indenter were 1 μm/s over a distance of 5 μm and the maximal applied force was set between 3 and 6 nN. The acquisition frequency was set at 1024 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ECM Thickness Measurement by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the thickness of ECMs following wound scratch, AFM force spectroscopy and contact imaging were performed using a JPK NanoWizard II Bio AFM in combination with a Bruker MLCT cantilever. A Nanoworld Arrow TL-1 cantilever with bead attached was used for force spectroscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Force-Spectroscopy Measurements of Purified Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Force-spectroscopy measurements were obtained using a custom-built AFM
instrument.30 (link) Automation routines to
control the AFM31 (link) were implemented in
LabView (National Instruments, Austin, Texas). Calibration of cantilever spring constants
were done in the buffer solution using the energy equipartition theorem.32 All measurements were performed in a PBS pH
7.4 solution at room temperature. Force spectroscopy experiments were performed using
pulling rates of 50, 300, 1500, and 3000 nm/s using MLCT cantilevers (Bruker, Camarillo,
CA) with the spring constant that varied between 16 and 150 pN/nm. In all experiments the
purified protein was diluted to ~100 µg/mL in PBS and applied to recently
evaporated gold and then incubated for an hour. A worm-like chain (WLC) model33 with persistence length of 0.4 nm was fit to
each peak in order to measure contour length increments in the force–extension
(FE) data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy of Ocy454 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ocy454 cells were plated onto 22 mm × 22 mm glass coverslips and allowed to grow for 16 to 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 with α-MEM. Thereafter, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before being incubated with pharmacological agents as indicated for 2 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 in α-MEM. After each treatment, cells were transferred to 60-mm culture dishes with prewarmed Hepes-based medium containing identical concentrations of the previously mentioned agents. Cells were probed with an MFP-1D atomic force microscope (Asylum Research) (64 (link), 65 (link)) using MLCT cantilevers (Bruker) with a nominal spring constant of k = 0.01 N/m. The pull distance used was 2 μm with a tip velocity of 4 μm/s to generate ~1 to 2 nN of force onto the cell corresponding to ~1-μm indentation, ensuring that the cytoskeleton was effectively being probed. The elastic moduli (stiffness) of the cells were calculated using the Sneddon-Hertz model, which has been described (66 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Cell Elasticity via Atomic Force Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MLCT cantilevers (Bruker) with nominal spring constants of 0.01 N/m were used to measure the Young’s modulus of elasticity of control, EDIN-expressing and Y-27632–treated cells. Cells were indented at a rate of 1 µm/s and the extension-deflection curves were fitted to a modified Hertz equation for a pyramidal tip, as previously described (Rosenbluth et al., 2006 (link)), using a code written in Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA). Experiments were conducted at 37°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Probing Cell Viscoelasticity via AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The viscoelasticity of cells was measured by using AFM (Nano Wizard III, JPK, Berlin, Germany) equipped with an inverted optical microscope (Leica, Germany). The viscoelastic properties were investigated in the force spectroscopy working mode. The culture dishes were placed in a Petri dish heater (JPK instrument, Berlin Germany) and maintained at 37 °C during the AFM indentations. Force–distance curve-based AFM measurements were carried out to calculate the optical photodiode deflection sensitivity and the cantilever spring constant was verified by the thermal noise method before experiments. MLCT cantilevers (Bruker, USA) made of silicon nitride with approximate spring constant values of 0.01 N·m−1 were employed in all AFM experiments. Selected areas surrounding the nuclei of cells (3 μm × 3 μm) were chosen for measurements in medium at room temperature. The indentation force was 1 nN with a constant velocity of 5 μm·s−1. All data were analyzed using the JPK data processing software [68 (link)]. The elastic modulus was acquired based on the Hertz model, and the viscosity was calculated by the method proposed by Rebelo’s group [65 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

AFM Imaging of Spore Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spores were immobilized for 1 h on a glass slide functionalized with polyethylenimine (Sigma-Aldrich, France) as described previously [29 ]. Spores were kept under 4.1 mM NaCl during the experiments. AFM measurements were performed in liquid using the Quantitative Imaging mode [22 (link)] with a Nanowizard III (JPK Instruments, Germany) and MLCT cantilevers (Bruker, Germany) with a measured spring constant at around 0.5 N/m and a force applied of 10 nN.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Nanomechanical Analysis of Bacterial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vegetative bacteria and spores were immobilized for 1 h on a glass slide coated with polyethylenimine, then washed and kept under 4.1 mM NaCl during the experiment. AFM measurements were performed with a Nanowizard III (JPK Instruments, Germany) in Quantitative Imaging mode (QI)36 (link)and Force Volume mode (FV). For QI, MLCT cantilevers (Bruker, Germany) were used with a spring constant measured at around 0.5 N/m. For FV mode, mechanical studies were performed with MLCT cantilevers for vegetative bacteria and PPP-NCH cantilevers (Nanosensors, Switzerland) for spores, with a spring constant of around 40 N/m. The forces applied to bacteria during FV measurements were 1 nN for vegetative cells and 10 nN for spores. An example of Force curves used for stiffness calculation is shown in Supplementary Fig. S6, according to the equation Kcell = K(S/1-S) where K is the cantilever spring constant and S the slope of the experimental force versus distance curve37 (link). Roughness values (Ra) were calculated from square height images of 500 μm. Adhesion values were performed with NPG-10 gold cantilevers functionalized by 1-Dodecanethiol (Sigma-Aldrich, France), as the procedure described previously by Alsteens et al.16 (link). All AFM analyses were performed with the JPK Data processing software (version 5.0.53).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biomechanical Characterization of Keratinocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM synchronised with optical microscopy (BioScope Resolve™ BioAFM, Bruker) was used to assess the biomechanical properties of the cells. Keratinocytes were seeded on substrates 24 h prior to analysis and measurements were conducted at 37 °C in complete FAD medium. Optical microscopy was used to localise the AFM tip on the top or base of PDMS topographical features. Silicon nitride MLCT cantilevers (Bruker) with nominal spring constants of 0.02 N/m (MLCT-B, for undulating substrates) and 0.6 N/m (MLCT-F, for flat substrates) were used. Both cantilever types have pyramidal tips with effective semi-included angles of 18° and a nominal radius of curvature of 20 nm. The size for each force-volume scan was selected in the range of 15–50 μm2 with 256 (=16 × 16) or 1024 (=32 × 32) force-separation measurement acquired. Each force-separation measurement was acquired with a maximum ramp size of 6 µm and ramp rate 0.5 Hz, up to a maximum force of 2 nN. Analysis of force-volume scans to obtain the Young’s modulus maps was performed with Nanoscope Analysis software (Bruker) using the linearized Sneddon conical model over the force range 0.4–1.6 nN and assuming a Poisson’s ratio of 0.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!