The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using masshunter profinder software

1

Untargeted Metabolomics Data Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A preliminary quality check of the data collected by LC-MS was performed by MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software (Agilent Technologies). The untargeted metabolomics raw data were processed by MassHunter Profinder software (Agilent Technologies) using the ‘Batch Recursive Feature Extraction’ algorithm that allows for cleaning from background noise and unrelated ions. The parameters used for mass extraction were: 500 counts for the peak filter; charge state limited to 2; permitted ion species for positive ion mode: +H, +Na, and +K, and −H, +Cl, and +CH3COO for negative ion mode; and neutral loss of water for both ion modes. To further reduce the acquired data size and complexity, a manual feature evaluation was performed by removing redundant and nonspecific information. This resulted in a dataset comprising a total of 1270 features (625 for the positive ion mode and 645 for the negative ion mode).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data extraction was performed using Agilent technologies MassHunter Profinder 10 using the Find by Formula algorithm (Agilent MassHunter Profinder Software: Attain Superior Feature Extraction. Agilent Application Note. 2016; 5991–6984EN.). In brief the algorithm uses the theoretical mass ±10ppm, isotopic distribution, and retention time to extract a compound from the raw mass spectral data. The extracted compound data was exported as volume for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolomic Analysis of Medicinal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First of all, use MassHunter Profinder software (version B.06.00, Agilent, California, USA) was used to extract sample data. The extracted data are normalized in MetaboAnalyst 5.0. Next, the normalized data are imported into SIMCA (version 14.1, MKS Umetrics), and principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) are carried out, respectively [11 (link)]. Select metabolic samples with |P(corr)| ≥0.58 and VIP >1 for further analysis. The METLIN (http://metlin.scripps.edu/) database and Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) (https://www.hmdb.ca/) were used to identify potential biomarkers. Potential markers visualized the enrichment pathway by MetaboAnalyst 5.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Untargeted Metabolomics and Lipidomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untargeted polar metabolites and nonpolar lipids were analyzed using an Agilent 6546 liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LC-QToF) with an Agilent Jet Stream source coupled to an Agilent Infinity II UHPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), as previously published [31 (link)]. Collected metabolite data were processed using MassHunter Profinder software (Version 10.0, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), normalized to IS, and putatively identified against the Agilent METLIN Metabolite PCDL (G6825-90008, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a curated in-house PCDL based on retention time (±0.15 min), precursor ions, MSMS spectra and a library threshold score of more than 80%. For the acquired lipid data, auto MSMS data on polled PBQC samples were obtained at collisions of 20 eV and 35 eV. The acquired MSMS lipid data were analysed using the Agilent Lipid Annotator tool (V1.0; Santa Clara, CA, USA) which assigned isometric structures based on MSMS fragmentation patterns. Annotated lipids were then curated into a PCDL, which was used to identify lipids within the remaining analyzed samples with retention time thresholds (±0.15 min), MSMS spectra, and a library threshold score of more than 80%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolomics Profiling by UPLC-QTOF/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MassHunter Profinder software (Agilent, California, United States) was used to extract sample data for peak detection and alignment. Full scan mode was applied in the mass range of 80–1000 m/z. The initial and final retention times were set for data collection. The resultant data matrices were normalized using MetaboAnalyst 3.01 and then introduced to SIMCA-P 13.0 software (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) for PCA and PLSDA analysis. PCA was used as an unsupervised pattern recognition approach to reduce the dimension of the UPLC-QTOF/MS data and disclose intrinsic clustering of samples. PLS-DA analysis was employed to maximize the differences in inter-class discrimination and minimize the differences in inter-class discrimination. The variables with VIP >1.5 and |p(corr)|≥0.58 in the PLS-DA analysis were further evaluated with an independent sample t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Profiling and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spectral data were extracted and aligned based on mass and retention time using MassHunter Profinder software B.08.00 (Agilent). The parameters for the molecular feature extraction included: a peak height of ≥1500 ion counts and possible ions with [M + H]+. The alignment also involved isotope grouping restrictions including: a peak spacing tolerance of 0.0020 m/z and 10.0 ppm and a maximum charge state of 1. It was also required that there were at least two or more ions for a single molecular feature. In addition, for binning and alignment purposes, a tolerance of 0.3 min for a retention time window was set along with a mass window of 20 ppm. Some of the post processing filters included: an absolute height filter of ≥3000 ion counts and the requirement for the molecular feature to be present in at least two out of three replicates in one experimental group.
The resulting aligned features were analyzed in MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (www.metaboanalyst.ca) and SIMCA-P + 14.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) for statistically significant differentiations between sampling conditions. The resulting m/z's were searched in METLIN database to determine possible candidate metabolites based on accurate mass and adduct.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metabolomic Profiling of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample data was extracted by using MassHunter Profinder software (version B.06.00; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for analysis and comparison. Data was normalized with MetaboAnalyst 4.0 and then SIMCA-P V14.1 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) was used for principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal-partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The potential biomarkers were identified based on precise molecular weight in the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) and METLIN (http://metlin.scripps.edu/) database. MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) was visualized enrichment pathway of potential markers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multivariate analysis of metabolomics data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed within Mass Hunter Profinder software (Agilent) for post-acquisition data processing. Then, the MetaboAnalyst database was used to normalize the original data. Multivariate data analysis was performed with SIMCA 14.0 (Umetrics, Sweden). OPLS-DA analysis based on non-targeted metabolomics was conducted in the serums between WT and WT + ANIT group, and WT and FXR-KO group (n: WT = 6, WT + ANIT = 6, FXR−/− = 6). The endogenous metabolites with VIP >1.5 and |p(corr)| ≥ 0.58 were selected as the differential biomarker for further pathway enrichment analysis. MetaboAnalyst and DAVID database were used to analyze the metabolic pathway and KEGG pathway. Metabolite targets were collected through the MBrole database (http://csbg.cnb.csic.es/mbrole2/) and applied to the Sangerbox database (http://sangerbox.com/) for GO enrichment analysis and the Metascape database (https://metascape.org/gp/) for protein interaction analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metabolomic Profiling of CHF Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Furthermore, a MassHunter Profinder software (version B.06.00, Agilent, California, USA) was utilized to analyze the sample data for peak detection and alignment. Full scans mode was employed and the mass range was 80–1000 m/z. The biochemical online database HMDB database (https://www.hmdb.ca/) and METLIN (https://metlin.scripps.edu/) were used to identify the potential metabolites. MetaboAnalyst 4.0 was used for the pathway analysis. Finally, to identify and visualize the affected metabolic pathways, the biomarkers were put into MetaboAnalyst 4.0 based on the pathway library of Rattus norvegicus (rat). In the present study, the bioactive components, possible biomarkers and potential mechanisms of HG and [6]-GR in the treatment of CHF induced by DOX were comprehensively elucidated using the serum metabolomics strategy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Metabolomic Analysis of Rat Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw mass data from the UPLC-Q-TOF/MS system were converted into.cef format by MassHunter Profinder software (Agilent Technologies Inc., USA), then imported to Agilent Mass Profiler Professional software (MPP, Agilent Technologies Inc., USA) for further processing. Parameters including Experiment type (identified and unidentified), Organism (Rattus norvegicus), Minimum absolute abundance (3 000 counts), Baseline option (Baseline to median of all samples) were set. Principal component analysis (PCA), and partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were employed for multivariate data analysis. In general, the model is effective when Q2Y > 0.4 and |R2Y-Q2Y|≤0.3. Metabolites were identified by HMDB (https://www.hmdb.ca/), METLIN (https://metlin.scripps.edu/) and KEGG (https://www.kegg.com). Pathway analysis were performed with Metabo Analyst (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare multiple groups, and independent-sample t-test was applied to compare two groups by SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). P < 0.05 is significant difference, and P < 0.01 means extremely significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!