The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Epothin

Manufactured by Buehler
Sourced in United States

The EpoThin is a laboratory equipment designed for epoxy resin mounting and polishing. It offers a controlled and consistent epoxy resin curing process to prepare samples for microscopic analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using epothin

1

Metal Alloy XRD Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six shafts of each file type—GT and GTX—were embedded in epoxy resin (Epo-Thin, Buehler, Germany) cylinder blocks and after cure they were slightly abraded with number 350 Silicon Carbide Waterproof Paper (Struers, Denmark). Shafts were then removed from their resin cast, their new flat surface was glued to a small piece of glass and flipped over before being included in a new epoxy resin cylinder. After cure, the metal was again abraded with sand paper until the shafts' maximum diameters were reached in order to obtain an area for analysis as large as possible. Samples were then removed from within the resin and mounted with silver colloid glue on the sample holder of the TTK-450 chamber, mounted on the XRD.
XRD measurements were performed using a diffractometer with a Bragg-Brentano mounting employing Cu-Kα radiation (wavelength of 1.54  Å´ ) produced by a rotating anode. The scanning was set up and programmed in the following way:

test samples were analysed over a 2θ range from 30° to 55°, using an increment step size of 0.04°, with a counting time of 0.5 seconds at each step;

angular scans were run for each file between temperatures of T (minimum) = −180°C and T (max) = 100°C (cooling and heating).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Restoration-Tooth Interface Gaps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before sectioning the teeth, an impression from the surface of the restoration (Precise, Coltene, Switzerland) was taken of 32 specimens (4 randomly selected restorations in each subgroup) and positive epoxy resin replica of each specimen (Epo-thin, Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) was obtained. Each resin replica was mounted on a metallic stub, sputter - coated with a thin layer of gold and examined under a field emission-SEM (FE-SEM) (Hitachi S-4160, Japan) with ×1000 magnification and interfacial gaps were measured [Figure 1]. The whole length of the gaps was expressed as a percentage of the length of the total restoration margins (enamel and dentin margins).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Femoral Bone Preparation for Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following scanning, right femora were encased in a non-infiltrating epoxy resin (EpoThin, Buehler) and cut into ~3mm thick transverse slabs (Exakt). Slabs were then hand-ground using a silicon carbide polishing pad (grit size 60, ~260 micron size) with ethylene glycol lubrication to provide a smoothened surface (Buehler). The distal most slab, ~500 μm proximal to distal growth plate, was selected for imaging via microcomputed tomography (μCT) and pushout testing while an adjacent slab was used for Raman spectroscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Humerus Microstructural Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following μCT scanning, bones were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions and embedded in a non-infiltrating epoxy resin (EpoThin, Buehler). A series of 700 μm thick transverse sections were made spanning the length of the humeri using a low-speed wafering blade (Phoenix 4000, Buehler). Sections were then fixed to plastic slides and ground and polished to a mirror finish using a series of grit papers followed by decreasing diameters (30 and 9μm) of colloidal diamond suspensions (Metadi, Buehler). Trabecular measurements were made on sections from the proximal humerus, between 1–1.5 mm distal to the proximal growth plate, while cortical measurements were made on diaphyseal sections cut from the cortical midshaft, just distal to the deltoid tuberosity, similar to the region of interest used for μCT analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Femur Sectioning and Polishing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After μCT scanning, femurs were dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol and embedded in an epoxy resin (EpoThin, Buehler). Roughly 1 mm thick slabs at the distal femoral ROI were cut from the embedded specimens (Isomet 5000, Buehler) and fixed to plastic slides. The slabs were ground to a thickness of roughly 500 μm and polished to a mirror finish (Phoenix 4000, Buehler), using a series of colloidal diamond suspensions (9, 3, 1 μm average particle size, Metadi, Buehler) with ethylene glycol as a lubricant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Restoration Interfacial Gaps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An impression (Permadyne Garant; 3M ESPE) was taken of 24 specimens (2 randomly selected specimens of each subgroup) and Epoxy resin replicas (Epo-thin, Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL) were obtained. Each replica was then mounted on a metallic stub, gold-sputtered (Polaron Range SC7620; Quorum Technology, Newhaven, UK), and observed under a FE-SEM (Hitachi s-4160, Japan) at ×1,0000 and interfacial gaps were measured [Figure 4]. The total length of the interfacial gaps was expressed as a percentage of the length of the whole restoration margins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Embedding Gyroid and Diamond Scaffolds for Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gyroid and diamond scaffolds were embedded in epoxy resin (EpoThin, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) and were kept inside a vacuum chamber at 25 Bar pressure for 30 min to be able to remove any trapped bubbles within the porous structure of the scaffolds. The resin was cured by placing the embedded specimens inside a pressure curing chamber at 2 MPa for a day. Cured samples were sectioned at the continuous visible struts level for further analysis. The samples were polished with sandpaper grits of P400, P800, P1200 and P2500 and a ChemoMet polishing cloth with polishing alumina until roughness of below 1 μm was obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Eggshell Microstructure Analysis using Polarized Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the eggshell microstructure using a polarized light microscope (Nikon LZM 1000), thin eggshell cross sections were prepared by embedding eggshells in epoxy resin (Buehler Epothin), cutting them with a low-speed diamond saw, mounting them on a glass slide, and polishing them down to less than 30 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Femur Sectioning and Polishing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After μCT scanning, femurs were dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol solutions and embedded in an epoxy resin (EpoThin, Buehler). 1 mm thick slabs at the femoral ROI were cut from the embedded specimens (Isomet 5000, Buehler) and fixed to plastic slides. The slabs were ground to a thickness of roughly 500 μm and polished to a mirror finish (Phoenix 4000, Buehler), using a series of colloidal diamond suspensions (9, 3, 1 μm average particle size, Metadi, Buehler) with ethylene glycol as a lubricant [14 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparing Mouse Humerus Samples for AFM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Humeri from two oim/oim and two +/+ 8-week old female mice were harvested and cleaned of surrounding soft tissue. The bones were left to dry in air for an hour and embedded in epoxy resin (EPOTHIN; Buehler, Lake Bluff, USA). The epoxy resin and hardener were mixed and let cool for 10 minutes prior to embedding the bones, in order to increase its viscosity and avoid the infiltration of resin into the pores. The resin-cast bone samples were left to polymerize at room temperature. The embedded humeri were then cut transversally at the mid-diaphysis using a low speed diamond saw (Isomet, Buehler GmbH, Germany). The proximal sections were cut in cubes and polished using increased grades of carbide papers (P800 to P4000). The sections were further polished using alumina powders (0.3 μm and 0.05 μm) to obtain a mirror-like surface for AFM scan. The finished surface has roughness less than 10 nm RMS when observed from 1×1 μm2 images. Samples were stored under ambient conditions (24°C and 60% RH) for further AFM characterizations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!