The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Origin version 2021

Manufactured by OriginLab
Sourced in United States

Origin version 2021 is a data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for data manipulation, statistical analysis, and visualization. The software supports a variety of data formats and is designed for scientific and engineering applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using origin version 2021

1

Comparative Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using the SPSS, version 26.0, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare means by the least significant difference (LSD) procedure. Tabular data are expressed as mean and relative standard deviation (RSD). p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Origin version 2021 developed by OriginLab was used for mapping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Triplicate Experiments and Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were conducted in triplicate and the data were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc test was carried out to compare mean group values. An alpha value of 0.05 was considered to be significant. The data was analyzed using Origin, Version 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microbial Adhesion and Growth Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the experiments were carried out in triplicates, the experiment data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were completed using the general linear model procedure of SAS [30 ]. The data, including the degradation efficiency of FG, OD 600 of LLK-XR1 under various carbon sources, and microbial adhesion, underwent one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significant differences were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple comparison analysis. The replicate test served as the experimental unit. * P value < 0.05 and ** P value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The growth curve of Lact. mucosae LLK-XR1 are performed with Origin version 2021 (OriginLab, Massachusetts USA), and other data are performed with ChiPlot software (https://www.chiplot.online).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drawings and statistical analysis were performed using MS Excel and Origin version 2021 (Origin Lab., Hampton, VA, USA). All data are presented as the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation. For the calculation of the statistical significance, two-sample t-tests (two-tailed) were performed (alpha level 0.05). An analysis of variance was performed to test for equal variances prior to t-test analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolomic Analysis of Biomarker Discovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Origin version 2021 (Origin Lab., Hampton, MA, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis and drawing. All data are presented as the mean ± SD (Standard Deviation). Comparisons between groups were conducted using one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test. Moreover, UPLC-MS/MS analyses were performed, where metabolites with a variable important in projection (VIP) ≥1 and fold change (FC) ≥2 or FC ≤0.5 were considered as criteria for screening potential biomarkers. The VIP values were extracted from the orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) results, which also contain score plots and permutation plots. These results were generated using the R package MetaboAnalystR (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/docs/RTutorial.xhtml, accessed on 21 October 2020). Significantly different metabolites were analyzed based on VIP values and Log2FC. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Data Analysis and Statistical Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Origin (Version 2021, Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for data analysis, plotting, and statistical evaluation. Raw data analysis was performed using MITlaos software (MATLAB R2016a, Natick, MA, USA). All data were tested in triplicate, represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA in SPSS (version 24.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with a 95% confidence level. p < 0.05 was considered as significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Drought Impact on Summer Maize Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The growth characteristics of summer maize under different drought conditions were analyzed by taking the difference between the drought-stressed and no drought-stressed summer maize indexes. The drought treatment group data minus the mean value of the control group data was used to represent the variation of each index. Difference data were shown in mean + standard deviation. The figures were drawn in Origin version 2021 (OriginLab Inc., Hampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were checked for normal distribution with the one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and for homogeneity of variances with Levene’s test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Duncan test were used to determine the differences among different groups of samples. When normal distribution and/or homoscedasticity were not achieved, data were subjected to the Kruskall–Wallis non-parametric test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) with a significance level of p < 0.05. Microsoft Excel 2019 and Origin version 2021 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) were used to generate additional plots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multivariate Analysis of Lipid Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were imported into SIMCA version 17.0.2 (Satorius AG, Goettingen, Germany) and multivariate statistical analysis including principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed. The unit variance scaling was applied to normalize the intensities of lipid features prior to analytical model fitting. The quality of PLS-DA model was evaluated by the values of explanatory parameter R2 and predictive parameter Q2. To avoid overfitting of analytical mode, thousand permutations test was carried out on the model. For univariate statistical analysis, we used Student’s t-test to obtain p-value. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for the discovery of biomarkers. For heatmap analysis, data was normalized by the area of internal standard for each lipid species, log-transformed and auto-scaled using Metaboanalyst version 5.0, “http://www.metaboanalyst.ca (accessed on 1 December 2022)”, and data visualization was conducted using Microsoft office Excel 2016. Differences in the biomarkers were compared using Origin, Version 2021 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Triplicate Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using Origin Version 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, United States, Version 9.8.0.200). Results are presented as mean values with corresponding confidence interval (CI) at 95% confidence level calculated from triplicate analyses (Cumming et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!