The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using nuclease p1

1

Embryonic DNA Nucleoside Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was purified from staged embryos by phenol chloroform extraction and subsequently digested to nucleosides using nuclease P1 (Roche), snake venom phosphodiesterase (Worthington), and alkaline phosphatase (Fermentas) and subjected to stable isotope dilution LC-MS/MS analysis as described in detail elsewhere [68 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of DNA Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analyses were performed as reported27 (link). Briefly, 1 μg of genomic DNA or S9.6 immunoprecipitated DNA was digested with a mixture of nuclease P1 (Roche), snake venom phosphodiesterase (Worthington) and alkaline phosphatase (Fermentas). One hundred nanograms of digested DNA were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Data were normalized using internal isotopic standards for each 5mC oxidation derivative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Transient RNA Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Newly synthesized RNA was pulse labeled by incubating confluent 10-cm culture dishes with 2 mM bromouridine (BrU; Sigma Aldrich) for 1 hour, either under normal culture conditions, under OND, or after 1 hour of recovery from OND. To estimate background incorporations, cells were analyzed without exposure to BrU. All experimental conditions were performed in triplicate. Following BrU pulse labeling, RNA was extracted using Trizol (Ambion) following the manufacturer’s instructions and following digestion to nucleosides with nuclease P1 (Roche), U snake venom phosphodiesterase (Worthington) and alkaline phosphatase (Fermentas) as described by Kellner et al. [77 (link)]. RNA nucleosides were subjected to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Separation was performed on an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system equipped with a ReproSil 100 C18 column (3 μm , 4.6 × 150 mm, Jasco GmbH) maintained at 30 °C. Identification and quantification of nucleosides was performed on an Agilent 6490 triple quadruple mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DNA Hydrolysis and Nucleoside Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, 1 μg of DNA was denatured by heating at 100°C for 3 min and subsequently chilled in ice slush. One-tenth volume of 0.1M ammonium acetate (pH 5.3) and 2 units of nuclease P1 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) were added. The mixture was then incubated at 45°C for 2 h. To the solution were subsequently added 1/10 volume of 1M ammonium bicarbonate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 0.002 units of venom phosphodiesterase I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The incubation was continued for an additional 2 h at 37°C. Thereafter, the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 0.5 units alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Oxidative DNA Damage Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and reagents were of the highest
purity available and were used without further purification. MMS,
EMS, NMU, TBHP, H2O2, RNase A, and alkaline
phosphatase were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
IMS was obtained from Pfaltz & Bauer, Inc. (Waterbury, CT). MNNG
was obtained from TCI America (Portland, OR). Sodium peroxynitrite
was obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). Nuclease P1
was obtained from Roche Diagnostic Corp. (Indianapolis, IN). Phosphodiesterase
I was obtained from USB (Cleveland, OH). Yeast extract and peptone
were obtained from Biomed Diagnostics, Inc. (White City, OR). Micron
YM10 filters were obtained from PALL Corp. (Port Washington, NY).
HPLC-grade water and acetonitrile were obtained from Mallinckrodt
Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ). S. cerevisiae BY4741 was obtained from American Type Culture Collections (Manassas,
VA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Enzymatic RNA Modification Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
tRNAPhe from yeast was produced by in vitro transcription (33 (link)) and incubated with recombinant TruB (34 (link)) in MST 1× buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 60 mM KCl, 0.02% Tween-20 at 80°C for 70 min). For release of the RNA from the enzyme, the reaction mixture was boiled for 10 min at 95°C and subsequently dissolved in 20 mM NH4OAc pH 5.3. The samples were incubated for 2 h at 70°C in the presence of 0.0003 U nuclease P1 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) per 10 pmol RNA, which leads to a complete degradation to mononucleotides. Snake venom phosphodiesterase (Worthington, Lakewood, USA) was then added to a concentration of 0.06 U per 100 μg RNA, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for another 1 h. Finally, to convert the resulting mixture of mononucleotides to free nucleosides, 1/10 volume of 10× FastAP buffer (Fermentas, St Leon-Roth, Germany) was added, followed by 3/20 volume of H2O, and 1 U of FastAP Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (FastAP stock at 1 U/μl; from Fermentas, St Leon-Roth, Germany). The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C and divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was spiked with 100 fmol pseudouridine, whereas the other was spiked with pure water, prior to adding 10 vol% of SIL-IS and subjecting the samples to LC-MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of DNA Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analyses were performed as reported27 (link). Briefly, 1 μg of genomic DNA or S9.6 immunoprecipitated DNA was digested with a mixture of nuclease P1 (Roche), snake venom phosphodiesterase (Worthington) and alkaline phosphatase (Fermentas). One hundred nanograms of digested DNA were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Data were normalized using internal isotopic standards for each 5mC oxidation derivative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!