The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phoenix winnonlin version

Manufactured by Certara
Sourced in United States

Phoenix® WinNonlin® is a software application used for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. It provides statistical tools and modeling capabilities for the analysis of drug concentration and effect data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using phoenix winnonlin version

1

Pharmacokinetics in Hepatic Impairment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous variables, and frequency distributions were presented for categorical variables. An interim analysis of PK and safety/tolerability data was conducted after the first 4 participants in the mild and moderate hepatic impairment groups had completed the study to inform further enrollment. Geometric means were calculated for Cmax, AUC0‐t, and AUC0‐∞, which were compared between each group with hepatic impairment and the group with normal hepatic function using a linear mixed‐effects model, with hepatic function group as a fixed effect. No imputations were made for missing data. Statistical analyses of safety outcomes were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina), and PK analyses were conducted using Phoenix WinNonlin version 6.2 (Certara, L.P., Princeton, New Jersey).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of CYP3A Deficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin version 8.0 (Certara, USA). Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was determined by visual inspection of the data from the concentration-time curves. The linear trapezoidal rule was used to obtain the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). An unpaired, 2-sided Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction was performed to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between the two mouse genotypes (wild-type and CYP3A deficiency). A one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to compare the Cmax and AUC0–4h between each of four treatment groups (vehicle or ketoconazole in wild-type mice or CYP3A-deficient mice).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bioavailability Assessment of Megestrol Acetate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Safety analysis were conducted on subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug, whereas pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on subjects who completed the entire study schedule.
For statistical analysis, SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was utilized. All descriptive statistics summarized continuous variables as the mean and standard deviation, and the categorical variables as the frequency and percentage. The bioavailability of megestrol acetate was assessed through the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the PK parameters (log-transformed Cmax and AUCt) using Phoenix WinNonlin® Version 8.3.5 (Certara). According to the regulations, bioequivalence was established if the 90% CI of the GMR was between 80.00% and 125.00%. The incidence rates of AEs and ADRs were compared among the treatment groups using Fisher’s exact test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Noncompartmental PD and PK Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following PD and PK parameters were derived from the noncompartmental method using Phoenix® WinNonlin® version 8.2 (Certara, St. Louis, MO, USA). The degree of platelet aggregation maximally inhibited by aspirin (i.e., maximum platelet aggregation (%)) was defined as the value of the lowest platelet aggregation (%) in each individual subject and determined from the observed platelet aggregation-time profiles. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) or the AUC for a dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) was calculated by the linear-up and log-down trapezoidal rule, and the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) was calculated as the sum of AUClast and the last measurable concentration divided by the terminal elimination rate constant (λz). The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) or Cmax at steady state (Cmax,ss) and the time to reach Cmax or Cmax,ss (Tmax or Tmax,ss) were obtained directly from the observed plasma concentration-time profiles. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) or the t1/2 at steady state (t1/2,ss) was calculated as ln (2) divided by λz. The metabolic ratio was calculated as the AUClast or AUCτ,ss ratio of the respective metabolite to the parent molecule.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pharmacokinetics of Relugolix and Estrogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic parameters for relugolix, NET, unconjugated E2, and unconjugated E1, including the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h post-dose (AUC0–24), maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, trough concentration (Ctrough), average concentration (Cavg; calculated as AUC0–24 divided by 24 h), and terminal elimination half-life (t1/2), were calculated using Phoenix® WinNonlin® version 6.3 or later (Certara USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA).
A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed for all participants who underwent blood sampling for determination of plasma or serum drug concentrations and who had evaluable pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the actual dosing, and sampling times and missing data were not imputed. For participants whose last quantifiable concentrations were collected prior to 24 h post-dose, the AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration was represented as AUC0–24.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of OATP1B Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from non-compartmental analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin version 8.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA). The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was determined by visual inspection of the data from the concentration–time curves. The linear trapezoidal rule was used to obtain the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC). The Cmax to baseline ratio (CmaxR) instead of the reference method that relies on the AUC to control ratio (AUCR) was used to evaluate the modulation of OATP1B function, as samples from an untreated group were not available in our study, and previous studies [13 (link),20 (link)] reported that such an approach provides data of equivalent utility. In the calculation of Cmax ratio of the endogenous biomarkers, the control values were set as the baseline concentration of corresponding patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Noncompartmental Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard noncompartmental PK methods were used to analyze parsaclisib plasma concentrations using Phoenix® WinNonlin version 8.0 (Certara USA, Inc). Any concentrations below the quantification limit of the assay were substituted by zero. All estimated PK parameters were summarized with mean, median, geometric mean, minimum values, maximum values, S.D., S.E., and CV%.
The maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax (Tmax) values were taken directly from the observed plasma concentration data. Total drug exposure across time as measured by the area under the concentration–time curve from the start of dosing to the last timepoint (AUC0–last) was estimated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the log‐trapezoidal rule for decreasing concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Nipocalimab

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used for participant characteristics, serum concentrations of nipocalimab and total IgG, derived PK parameters (as appropriate), laboratory tests, ECG, and vital signs. PK parameters were calculated from the serum nipocalimab concentration-time data using noncompartmental analysis (Phoenix® WinNonlin®, version 7.0; Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA). All statistical analysis and reporting were generated using SAS for Windows, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pemigatinib Pharmacokinetics in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma PK samples were collected predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h postdose on days 1 and 14 of the first cycle and predose only on days 2, 8, 15, and 16. Participants fasted for 8 h before taking study drug in the clinic and fasted for 1 additional hour after. The plasma samples were assayed by a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method with a linear validated range of 1 to 1000 nM in human plasma. Standard noncompartmental PK methods were used to analyze pemigatinib plasma concentration versus time data using Phoenix® WinNonlin® version 8.0 (Certara USA Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pharmacokinetics of Tucatinib, Metformin, and Iohexol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tucatinib plasma trough concentrations, plasma and urine concentrations of metformin, and plasma concentrations of iohexol were determined. The following main pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis (Phoenix® WinNonlin® version 8.1 or higher; Certara, L.P., Princeton, New Jersey) from the plasma concentration–time data: maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax; metformin only), terminal elimination half‐life (t½), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last available measurement (AUC0‐last), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0‐inf), systemic clearance (CLsyst; iohexol only), renal clearance (CLrenal; metformin only), apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F; metformin only), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F; metformin only). Pharmacodynamic parameters (serum concentrations of creatinine and cystatin C and 24‐hour microalbumin) were summarized with changes from baseline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!