The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using cascade 512b

1

Measuring Intracellular Calcium Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated in EGM-2 containing 3.5 µM Fura-2-AM (Invitrogen) for 1 h at 37 °C and then rinsed with either Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Sigma) or Ca2+ free Krebs Henseleit Hepes buffer (KHH). Dishes were placed into a culture chamber kept at 37 °C controlled temperature on the stage of an inverted microfluorimeter (Nikon TE2000E) connected to a cooled CCD camera (512B Cascade, Princeton Instruments). Samples were illuminated alternately at 340 and 380 nm using a random access monochromator (Photon Technology International) and emission was detected using a 510 nm emission filter. Images were acquired (1 ratio image/s) using Metafluor software (Universal Imaging Corporation). Calibration of the signal was obtained at the end of each experiment by maximally increasing intracellular Ca2+-dependent Fura-2 fluorescence ratio (340/380) with 5 µM ionomycin (ionomycin calcium salt from Streptomyces conglobatus, Sigma) followed by recording minimal ratio in Ca2+-free medium. [Ca2+]i was calculated according to previously described formulas55 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracellular Calcium Measurement using Fura-2-AM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated in EGM-2 containing 3.5 μM Fura-2-AM (Invitrogen) for 1 h at 37°C and then rinsed with Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS Sigma) or Krebs-Henseleit-HEPES (KHH) buffer (140 mM Na+, 5.3 mM K+, 132.4 mM Cl, 0.98 mM PO42−, 1.25 mM Ca2+, 0.81 mM Mg2+, 5.5 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES). Plates were placed into a culture chamber kept at 37°C controlled temperature on the stage of an inverted microfluorimeter (Nikon TE2000E) connected to a cooled CCD camera (512B Cascade, Princeton Instruments). Samples were illuminated alternately at 340 and 380 nm using a random access monochromator (Photon Technology International) and emission was detected using a 510 nm emission filter. Images were acquired (1 image/sec ratio) using MetaFluor software (Universal Imaging Corporation). Calibration of the signal was obtained at the end of each experiment by maximally increasing intracellular Ca2+-dependent Fura-2-AM fluorescence with 5 μM ionomycin (ionomycin calcium salt from Streptomyces conglobatus, Sigma) followed by recording minimal fluorescence in Ca2+-free medium. [Ca2+]i was calculated according to previously described formulas [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Intracellular Calcium Imaging in PASMCs and PAECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+] i) determination, PASMCs or PAECs cultured on 35‐mm dishes were incubated in a culture medium containing 3.5 μmol/L FURA‐2‐AM (Invitrogen) for 1 hours at 37°C and subsequently rinsed with HBSS (Sigma). Each dish was placed into a culture chamber at 37°C on the stage of an inverted fluorescence microscope (NikonTE2000E), connected to a cooled CCD camera (512B Cascade, Roper Scientific). Samples were illuminated alternately at 340 and 380 nm using a random‐access monochromator (Photon Technology International), and emission was detected using a 510 nm emission filter. Images were acquired (1 ratio image per second) using Metafluor software (Universal Imaging Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Calcium Imaging of B16 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B16 cells cultured on 35-mm dishes were incubated in culture medium containing 3.5 μmol/L FURA-2-AM (Invitrogen) for 1 h at 37 °C, and then rinsed with Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Sigma). Each dish was placed into a culture chamber at 37 °C on the stage of an inverted fluorescence microscope (TE2000E, Nikon Instruments, Fi, Italy), connected to a cooled CCD camera (512B Cascade, Roper Scientific, Ottobrunn, Germany). Samples were illuminated alternately at 340 and 380 nm using a random access monochromator (Photon Technology International, New Jersey, USA) and emission was detected using a 510 nm emission filter. Images were acquired (1 ratio image per s) using Metafluor software (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downington PA, USA). Calibration was obtained at the end of each experiment by maximally increasing intracellular Ca2+-dependent FURA-2AM fluorescence with 5 μmol/L ionomycin (ionomycin calcium salt from Streptomyces conglobatus, Sigma) followed by recording minimal fluorescence in a Ca2+-free medium. [Ca2+]i was calculated according to the formulas previously described54 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunofluorescence assay, the lung sections were treated with rabbit anti-RELM-β polyclonal antibodies (1:200, Abcam, UK) and mouse anti-α-SMA antibody (1:500) or the corresponding vehicle overnight at 4 °C. Then, the sections were incubated with FITC-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (1:50, Boster, CHN) (excitation: 495 nm, emission: 525 nm) and Cy3-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (1:50, Boster, CHN) (excitation: 554 nm, emission: 568 nm) for 45 min at room temperature in the dark. Finally, the sections were washed in PBS and mounted with Vectashield hardset mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dilactate (DAPI, Vector Laboratories, USA). Specimens were observed under a fluorescent inverted microscope (IX73-A22FL/PH; Olympus Corporation; light source: UHP) attached to a CCD digital camera (512B Cascade, Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ). Blue (WU) and green filters (WIBA) were used to detect FITC (green) and Cy3 (red) signals, respectively. The objectives used were 20 × and 40 × . Images were captured by using the Image-Pro Plus software (version 6.0) and colorized with Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received. All solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (18 MΩcm) from a Millipore system. 1H NMR and 13C NMR were acquired in CDCl3 on BRUKER AVANCE 500 spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard. HRMS were obtained on HP5989 mass spectrometer. The dark-field spectrum measurements were carried out on an inverted microscope (eclipse Ti-U, Nikon, Japan) equipped with a dark field condenser (0.8 < NA < 0.95), a 100 W halogen lamp, a true-color digital camera (Nikon DS-fi), a monochromator (Acton SP2300i) equipped with a spectrograph CCD (CASCADE 512B, Roper Scientific) and a grating (grating density: 300 L/mm; blazed wavelength: 500 nm). The true-color scattering images of gold nanoparticles were taken using a 40X objective lens (NA = 0.8). The scattering spectra from the individual nanoparticles were corrected by subtracting the background spectra taken from the adjacent regions without the GNPs and dividing it with the calibrated response curve of the entire optical system. The spectra were integrated for 10 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Imaging Bipolar Neurons Using TIRF Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bipolar neurons were imaged as previously described (Coggins et al., 2007 (link)). Briefly, cells were observed through an inverted microscope (Olympus IX-70) modified for objective-type evanescent field illumination (Stout and Axelrod, 1989 (link); Axelrod, 2001 (link)) using a 1.65 NA objective and a 561-nm solid state laser (Melles Griot). Fluorescence images were captured using an EM-CCD camera (Cascade 512B, Roper Scientific). Vesicle image analysis was performed using a custom-written image analysis program written in Matlab (Mathworks) (Zenisek et al., 2002 (link))
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Corneal Fluorescence Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after euthanization and corneal button trephination, buttons were frozen on dry ice until further processing. Twenty-micrometer thick sagittal slices were cut using a cryotome from both RF and RF-D500 in vivo treated corneas, and mounted on a microscope glass slide, stored frozen and in the dark until consecutive fluorescence readings. Fluorescence intensity from three serial slices per cornea was recorded using a fluorescence microscope (BX61 Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a CCD camera (Cascade 512B, Roper Scientific, Inc., Tucson, AZ). An excitation wavelength of 488 nm was used, and fluorescence intensity above 530 nm was recorded using a filter. Intensity of 50 lines within each image of a cross section were averaged using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). To avoid bias, the analysis was done blinded with respect to sample treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dark-field Microscopy Quantification of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DFM images were acquired on an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71, Olympus Co.) equipped with a 100 objective lens (NA, 0.8) and a dark-field condenser (0.8 < NA < 0.95). The scattered light from a 100 W halogen lamp was recorded by an Olympus DP70 digital camera to generate dark-field color images and by a spectrograph CCD equipped with a monochromator (CASCADE 512B, Roper Scientific.) to obtain scattering spectra (integrated over 10 s) of selected AuS, AuR and AuS-AuR particles in wells.
DFM images were processed with the NIH IMAGE J software with the color threshold set as hue 0, saturation 0, and brightness 255. Image areas with brightness equal to 255 were software-selected, and the ratios of these areas to those of the whole images were calculated by the software to give area ratios indicating specific nPES EV signal. Linear regression of nPES area ratio with log10 EV concentration was used to generate the standard concentration curve for derivation of experimental EV concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanoscale Characterization of DNA Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gold pads were cleaned by immersing them stepwise for 20 s into 100% fuming nitric acid (Merck) and 1 min into a neutralization solution [hydrogen peroxide (30 wt % in water; Merck), ammonia solution (25 wt % in water; Merck) and ddH2O in the ratio 1:1:5] and rinsed with ddH2O. Then, such a glass slide was placed in an inverted optical microscope (Axiovert 200M, Carl Zeiss MicroImaging) equipped with a 100×/1.45 numerical aperture oil immersion objective and appropriate fluorescence filter sets. A PDMS ring was sealed with silicon oil on the glass substrate in between the electrodes and contact pads. In addition, the microscope was equipped with micromanipulators (Suess MICROTec PH100) that were used to place tungsten needles (SIGNATONE SE-T) on the contact pads, and thus, connect the electrodes with the function generator (Textonix AFG 320; Sony). The DNA nanostructures were stained with YOYO®-1 (Life Technologies) in a ratio of 1:10 and diluted with ddH2O to a final concentration of 45 pM 6HBs and 1.5 mM Mg2+. 15 µL of this solution was pipetted into the PDMS ring and an (ac) field applied. Images were taken in the green channel with a frame-transfer intensified CCD camera (Cascade 512:B, Roper Scientific) using the MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!