The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rt qpcr system

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

RT-qPCR Systems are laboratory instruments designed for the detection and quantification of specific RNA sequences through reverse transcription and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) technology. These systems provide a controlled environment and automated workflows for accurate and reproducible RNA analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using rt qpcr system

1

Transcriptome Analysis of LcGRASs Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the Hot borate method described by Wan and Wilkins [97 (link)], the cDNA strand was synthesized with the HiScriptII Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme Cat No. R223-01). RT-qPCR was performed with GoTaq® qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega Cat No. A6001) using a Light Cycler 480 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Primers of LcGRASs, and two reference genes GAPDH and EF [98 (link)] were designed by Primer Premier 5.0 (Additional file 1: Table S7). Each expression profile was independently verified in three biological replicates. The relative expression level of each gene was calculated by the 2-△△Ct method [99 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying GHR Expression in Yak Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA of yak tissue was extracted using the Trizol method, and the integrity of RNA was identified with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthesized via reverse transcription using a translator first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche, Shanghai, China) and stored at −20 °C for further analysis. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using Go Taq®qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to investigate the expression levels of the GHR messenger RNA (mRNA) in each tissue. Three replicates were selected for each sample. The primer information is provided in Supplementary Table S1. The RT-qPCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, 95 °C for 5 s, 64 °C for 20 s for a total of 40 cycles, and 72 °C for 30 s. The results were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Viral Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total viral RNA from a culture supernatant and/or monolayers was extracted using QIAamp Viral RNA (Qiagen®) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT‒PCR was performed using GoTaq® Probe qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega) in a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Amplifications were carried out in 25 µL reaction mixtures containing 2× reaction mix buffer, 50 µM of each primer, 10 µM of probe, and 5 µL of RNA template. Primers, probes, and cycling conditions recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol were used to detect SARS-CoV-252 . The standard curve method was employed for virus quantification. For reference to the cell amounts used, the housekeeping gene RNAse P (F-5′-AGATTTGGACCTGCGAGCG-3′, R-5′GAGCGGCTGTCTCCACAAGT-3′, P-5′-FAM-TTCTGACCTGAAGGCTCTGCGCG-BHQ-1-3′) was amplified. The Ct values for this target were compared to those obtained for different cell amounts, 107 to 102, for calibration. Alternatively, genomic (ORF1; F-5′-ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG-3′, R-5′-CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT-3′, P–5′-FAM-AGATGTCTTGTGCTGCCGGTA-BHQ-1-3′) and subgenomic (ORFE; F-5′ACAGGTACGTTAATAGTTAATAGCGT-3′, R-5′-ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA-3′, P-5′-FAM-ACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGCGCTTCG-BHQ-1-3′) were detected, as described elsewhere53 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from platelet samples with the QIAamp Viral RNA kit (Qiagen, Germany). Quantitative RT–qPCR was performed with GoTaq® Probe qPCR and RT–qPCR Systems (Promega) on StepOne™ Real-Time PCR equipment (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Amplification reactions were carried out with 50 µM of each primer, 10 µM of probe, and 5 µL of RNA template, following the protocol recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to detect SARS-CoV-2 [26 (link)]. The housekeeping gene RNAse P was used as a reference for endogenous cells, and the delta-delta Ct method (i.e., 2–∆∆Ct) was used to quantify the relative fold change in viral load in each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 and HERV-K RNA Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from TA and plasma was extracted using QIAamp Viral RNA (Qiagen, Germany). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using GoTaq Probe qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega, USA) in a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA). The primers, probes, and cycling conditions used to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA have been described elsewhere [37 (link)], with a standard curve for the SARS-CoV-2 N gene (Microbiologics, MN, USA).
For HERV-K analysis, extraction and amplification were performed as described elsewhere [38 ]. Of note, the RNA concentration was determined (NanoDrop 2000, ThermoFisher Scientific, CA, USA) and adjusted to 10 μg before cDNA synthesis [0.5 μl of oligo (dT)20, 0.5 μl of random hexamer primers, 10 mM dNTPs, First-Strand Buffer, 0.1 M DTT, and 200 U SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, CA, USA)]. A total of 100 ng of cDNA (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to run 50-cycle real-time PCR [PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Osteogenic Differentiation Analysis of hBMSCs on 3D Composite Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs on the 3D composite scaffolds, the expression levels of osteogenesis-related genes such as COL1, RUNX2, and OPN were determined via qRT-PCR. hBMSCs (2 × 105 cells per well) were seeded onto the composite scaffolds, cultured for 14 days, and transferred into a 15 mL plastic tube containing 2 mL of Trizol solution (Bio Science Technology, Daegu, Korea) to extract RNA. Next, RNA samples were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The composite scaffolds were analyzed using GoTaq® qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The relative expression level for each target gene was normalized to the expression level of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Table 1 presents all primer sequences used. At least six species per sample were tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative gene expression analysis in mouse ear samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mice ear samples (50 mg) were prepared for the isolation of total RNA using the Maxwell® RSC simply RNA kits (promega, USA). The Promega kit (GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System) was used for the synthesis of the complementary DNA. Then, 1 ug of cDNA was used in the RT-qPCR Systems (promega, USA) on white 96-well plates. Real-time PCR was performed on a Roche Lightcycler 480II. The conditions were 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min, and a single fluorescence measurement was performed.
The sequences of the real-time PCR primers were as follows: IL-17A forward GGACTCTCCACCGCAATGA reverse TCAGGCTCCCTCTTCAGGAC. IL-23 forward CCCGTATCCAGTGTGAAGATG reverse GGGCTATCAGGGAGTAGAGCA. TNF-α forward TCTCATGCACCACCATCAAG reverse GAGGCAACCTGACCACTCTC. IFN-γ forward CTGCTGATGGGAGGAGATGT reverse TTTGTCATTCGGGTGTAGTCA. IL-1β forward CCCTGCAGCTGGAGAGTGTGGA reverse TGTGCTCTGCTTGTGAGGTGCTG. IL-6 forward ACTTCCATCCAGTTGCCTTC reverse ATTTCCACGATTTCCCAGAG. CXCL-9 forward TGTGGAGTTCGAGGAACCCT reverse AGTCCGGATCTAGGCAGGTT. CXCL-10 forward CCACGTGTTGAGATCATTGCC reverse GAGGCTCTCTGCTGTCCATC. CCL-20 forward CAGGCAGAAGCAAGCAACTAC reverse AGCTTCATCGGCCATCTGTC. GAPDH forward TGGCCTTCCGTGTTCCTAC reverse GAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCA.
Primer sequences were all from 5' to 3'.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total viral RNA from culture supernatants and/or monolayers was extracted using QIAamp Viral RNA (Qiagen®), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a GoTaq® Probe qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega, Madison, WS, USA) in a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Primers, probes, and cycling conditions recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 [32 ]. The standard curve method was employed for virus quantification. For reference to the cell amounts used, the housekeeping gene RNAse P was amplified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Quantification and Genomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA from TA was extracted using QIAamp Viral RNA (Qiagen, Germany), according to manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using GoTaq Probe qPCR and RT-qPCR Systems (Promega, USA) in a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA). Primers, probes, and cycling conditions used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 RNA have been described elsewhere 15 . A standard curve was employed for virus quantification, using synthetic RNA for gene N (Microbiologics, MN, USA). Amplifications were carried out in 25 µL reaction mixtures containing 2× reaction mix buffers, 50 µM of each primer, 10 µM of probe, and 5 µL of RNA template.
HERV-K was amplified as described elsewhere 23 . Total RNA from the plasma or Genomic sequences were quality-scored, filtered, trimmed, assembled in contigs, and assigned an ID through a validated workflow for SARS-CoV-2 50 (Genome Detective).
Consensus fasta sequences were aligned with ClustalW in Unipro UGENE 51 (version 38), and phylogenies were constructed with Nextclade 52 to assign the emerging clades (Supplementary Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RT-qPCR Analysis of Angiogenic Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the Promega SV Total RNA Isolation System (#Z3100) from Ctrl and siRNA-depleted ECs. cDNA was prepared using the Promega GoScriptTM Reverse Transcriptase Kit (#A5000). RT-qPCR analysis was performed using a Viia7 RT-qPCR System using Promega GoTaq® PCR mastermix (#A6102) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The following oligonucleotide primer/probe sets were used: mouse NRP1: Mm00435379_m1; mouse NRP2: Mm00803099_m1; mouse GAPDH: Mm99999915_g1 (Thermo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!