The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Synergy ht gens5

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Synergy HT GENS5 is a multi-mode microplate reader designed for high-throughput screening and quantitative analysis. It offers detection modes for absorbance, fluorescence, luminescence, and time-resolved fluorescence. The device is capable of performing kinetic and endpoint measurements and supports a wide range of microplate formats.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using synergy ht gens5

1

Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation of Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FRAP assay was determined according to Ferreira et al. (2023) [36 (link)]. In a microplate, aliquots of 35 µL of each extract (Section 3.6) were mixed with 265 µL of the FRAP reagent: acetate buffer (0.3 M), TPTZ solution (10 mM), and FeCl3 (20 mM). The microplate was incubated (37 °C, 30 min), light-protected, and the absorbance was measured in a microplate reader at 595 nm (Synergy HT GENS5, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). A calibration curve with ferrous sulphate (y = 0.002x + 0.080, R2 = 0.999, 25–500 mg/L) was used for quantification. Results were expressed as g of FSE/100 g of sample in fw and dw.
DPPH-SA assay was determined according to Ferreira et al. (2023) [36 (link)]. In a microplate, aliquots of 30 µL of each extract (Section 3.6) were mixed with 270 µL of fresh DPPH solution in ethanol (6 × 10−2 mM). Absorbance (525 nm) was measured in a microplate reader (Synergy HT GENS5, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) every 2 min until reaction endpoint at 20 min to assess the kinetics of the reaction. A Trolox calibration curve was obtained (y = −0.007x + 0.540, R2 = 0.999, 5.62–175.34 mg/L) and results presented in g of TE/100 g of sample in fw and dw.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimizing Phenolic Compound Extraction from Olive Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the extraction of phenolic compounds, the mass/volume ratio was optimized using milled olive leaves and 80/20 methanol/water (V/V) as solvent. The mixture was agitated in a magnetic stirrer (MS-H-S10 magnetic stirrer, ChemLand, Usługowa, Stargard, Poland) at a constant temperature (40 °C) and agitation (600 rpm) for 1 h, according to Melo et al. (2021) [127 (link)]. The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by a spectrophotometric method with the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent at room temperature using an absorbance reading of 765 nm in a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Synergy HT GENS5, Winooski, VT, USA) following Melo et al. (2021) [127 (link)]. Results are reported in g of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g of sample fresh weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Determination of Total Phenolic Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TPC was determined according to Ferreira et al. (2023) [36 (link)]. In a microplate, 30 µL of each extract (Section 3.6) was mixed with 150 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent (1:10) and 120 µL of 7.5% (m/V) Na2CO3. The microplate was incubated at 45 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 min at room temperature (RT), light-protected. The sample’s absorbance was measured in a microplate reader (Synergy HT GENS5, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at 765 nm. A gallic acid calibration curve (y = 0.009x + 0.006, R2 = 0.999, 5–100 mg/L) was used for quantification. Results are expressed in g of GAE/100 g of sample in fw and dw.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Total Flavonoid Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TFC was evaluated according to Ferreira et al. (2023) [36 (link)]. Thus, 1 mL of each extract (Section 3.6) was mixed with 4 mL of deionized water and 300 µL of 5% NaNO2 (m/V). After 5 min at RT, 300 µL of 10% AlCl3 (m/v) was added to the previous mixture. Later, after incubation at RT (1 min), 2 mL of 1 M NaOH and 2.5 mL of deionized water were added. The absorbance was measured at 510 nm in a microplate reader (Synergy HT GENS5, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). A catechin calibration curve (y = 0.002x + 0.001, R2 = 0.998, 2.5–400 mg/L) was used for quantification. The sample’s TFC is expressed in g of CE/100 g of sample in fw and dw.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determination of Total Phenolic Content in Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolic compounds (TPC) in oil were determined according to the method described by Costa et al. in 2018 [39 (link)]. Briefly, 30 μL of the extract, 150 µL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1:10), and 120 µL of sodium carbonate solution (7.5% m/V) were mixed and incubated (15 min, 45 °C). After 30 min, the absorbance was read at 765 nm in a microplate reader (Synergy HT GENS5, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). A calibration curve was prepared with the standard—gallic acid (5–100 mg/L).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimizing Phenolic Extraction from Quince Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the extraction of phenolic phytochemicals, the mass/volume ratio was optimized using milled quince leaves and 80/20 methanol/water (v/v) as solvent. The mixture was agitated in a magnetic stirrer (MS-H-S10 magnetic stirrer, ChemLand, Poland) at a constant temperature (40 °C) and agitation (600 rpm) for 1 h, according to Melo et al. (2021) [41 (link)].
The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by a spectrophotometric method with the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent at room temperature using an absorbance reading of 765 nm in a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Synergy HT GENS5, EUA) following Costa et al. (2018) [42 (link)]. Results are reported in g of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g of sample fresh weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!