The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti ifn β

1

Immunoblot Analysis of Innate Immunity Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoblotting analysis, lung samples and cell lysates lysed by RIPA buffer (Beyotime, China) were resolved by SDS–PAGE and transferred to the polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, United States). Immunoblots were visualized by the ECL system (Fdbio Science, China). The following antibodies were used in immunoblotting analysis: antibodies for anti-IFITM3 (1:2,000), anti-MFN2 (1:2,000), anti-IFN-β (1:500) antibody and anti-IL-1β (1:1,000) were from Abcam. β-actin antibody (1:2,000) was purchased from Fude Biotechnology. Anti-phospho-IRF3 (1:1,000), and anti-TNF-α (1:2,000) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-MAVS (1:500) antibodies were obtained from Proteintech Group. β-actin was used as an internal control and the relative densities of the measured protein were quantified by image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Immunodetection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells or tissues were lysed, and the total protein concentration was measured using the BCA assay. Equal quantities of proteins were resolved using SDS-PAGE and then transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Next, the membrane was blocked at 37 °C for 2 h and then incubated with the primary antibody (anti-COLII, anti-ACAN, anti-NF-κB, anti-IFN-β, anti-GAPDH [all from Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA], or anti-Trim14 [Novus Biologicals] antibody) at 4 °C overnight. The membrane was washed three times with PBST (PBS with Tween 20, Solarbio) and then incubated with the horseradish-peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) (diluted 1: 10,000 with PBST) at 37 °C for 2 h. Finally, the membrane was washed five times with PBST and developed using chemiluminescence (BeyoECL Star [Beyotime, Shanghai, China]). The results were analyzed using the ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Validation for Western Blot and Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-NF-κB, anti-IRF3, anti-TBK1, anti-IFN-β, anti-GAPDH, anti-pNF-κB, anti-pTBk1, anti-pIRF3 and anti-DDDDK for WB and immunofluorescence (IF) assays were purchased from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Anti-HA and anti-Myc for WB and immunofluorescence (IF) assays were purchased from Thermo Fisher (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Anti-J-2 for IF assays were purchased from Scicons (Scicons, Szirák, Hungary). Secondary antibodies labeled with Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 555, Alexa Fluor 594 or Alexa Fluor 647 for the IF assay were purchased from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Goat anti-mouse IgG H&L (HRP) and goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L were purchased from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and used in the WB assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Servicebio, China) with a protease inhibitor (PMSF, Servicebio, China) using routine procedures to extract total proteins. Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, followed by the transfer of supernatants to fresh EP tubes. The BCA protein assay was used for protein quantification. Each sample (25 μg) was loaded onto a 12.5 % SDS-PAGE. The membrane was treated with 5 % non-fat milk for 1 h and then washed three times with TBST (Servicebio, China). After washing, membranes were left overnight at 4 °C with anti–IFN–β (1:1000, Abcam, UK) and anti–HIF–1 alpha (1:1000, Abcam, UK) antibodies. After washing, the membranes were incubated for 2 h with anti-rabbit secondary antibodies. Membranes were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis of Immune Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were homogenized in radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer supplemented with Pierce™ EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Tablets and Pierce™ Phosphatase Inhibitor Mini Tablets (all Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at 4 °C, and then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The protein concentrations were determined by a bicinchoninic acid Protein Concentration Determination Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Protein expression was determined using anti-p-STAT1, anti-STAT1, anti-TBK1, anti-IRF3, anti-p-TBK1, anti-p-IRF3, anti-GAPDH (all Cell Signaling Technology), anti-IFN-β, or anti-GBP2 (all Abcam, Cambridge, UK) antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Finally, membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies (Abcam) and scanned by a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imager (Bio-Rad). The antibodies used were listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Decitabine Induces ERV-3 and IFNβ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MOLM-14 and MV4–11 were treated with low-dose decitabine (25nM and 50nM) daily X 3 days. Cells were assessed for ERV-3 (anti-ERV-3 Everest Biotech, Oxfordshire, UK, 30 kD) and IFNβ (anti-IFNβ Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 22 kD) expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-mouse CD45 (30-F11), Ly-6G (1A8), Ly-6C (AL-21), CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (HL3), F4/80 (BM8), CD49b (DX5), CD3ε (145–2C11), CD4 (GK1.5), CD8α (Ly-2, 53–6.7), and CD19 (1D3) flow cytometry antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Flow cytometry analysis was performed 48 hr after treatment. Blood samples were obtained via retro-orbital bleeding and mice were euthanized immediately afterwards and tumors and spleens were harvested. Organs were gently disrupted into single-cell suspensions in progressive steps. Cells were stained to identify immune cell populations with a blocking step using anti-mouse CD18/CD32 and analyzed using a BD FACS LSR II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). FlowJo software was used to analyze data. For intracellular IFNβ staining, surface-stained cells were fixed and permeabilized (Fix/Perm Wash Buffer, BioLegend, San Diego, CA), stained with anti-IFNβ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and followed by secondary antibody staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!