The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aluminum pin stubs

Manufactured by Agar Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

Aluminum pin stubs are cylindrical sample holders designed for use in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and other related analytical techniques. They provide a sturdy and conductive platform to mount and secure samples for examination under the electron beam.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using aluminum pin stubs

1

Quantifying Airborne Microbial Spores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two hundred microliters from each aliquot were filtrated onto a 25 mm polycarbonate filter (pore size: 0.45 μm, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Subsequently, the filters were air-dried under sterile conditions and then mounted onto 25 mm diameter aluminum pin stubs (Agar Scientific Ltd., Stansted Essex, United Kingdom) using double-sided carbon adhesive discs. The filter samples were coated with 5-6 nm platinum in a Cressington 200HR Sputter Coater (Cressington Scientific Instruments Ltd., Watford, UK). Spores of bacterial and fungal origin were identified based on morphological characteristics. Spores were counted in 100 randomly selected imaged fields at ×3,000 magnification and reported as the number of spores m−3 air. The number of spores was estimated by extrapolating the counts in the selected fields to the whole filter using the following formula: Sporesperm3=n×filtrationfilterarea(μm2)×Dilutionfactork×FESEMimagefieldarea(μm2)×sampledairvolume(m3) where
n = number of particles counted on the filter; k = 100; filtration filter area of 25 mm filter = 227 × 106 μm2; FESEM Image field area at 3,000 = 1064 μm2. Dilution factor: 35 [14 (link)]. The lowest detectable number of particles (LOD) with FESEM was 3.73 × 104 m−3 at a total air sampled volume of 1 m3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Specimen Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed with 1.5% glutaraldehyde solution at 4°C for 30 min, followed by dehydrating through ascending grades of ethanol (from 50% to 100%). Dehydrated samples were further dried by evaporation of the HMDS. Next, samples were mounted onto aluminum pin stubs (Agar Scientific) with Adhesive Carbon Tabs (Agar Scientific). Samples were sputter‐coated with Au/Pd before imaging with Phenom Pro desktop SEM (Phenom‐World) at approximately 500× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Fungal and Actinobacteria Spores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microscopic analysis, 0.5 mL of each aliquoted sample was filtered onto a 25-mm polycarbonate filter (pore size, 0.45 μm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The filters were then air-dried under sterile conditions and mounted onto 25-mm-diameter aluminum pin stubs (Agar Scientific Ltd., Stansted Essex, UK) using double-sided adhesive carbon discs. The filter samples were coated with 5 to 6 nm platinum in a Cressington 200HR sputter coater (Cressington Scientific Instruments Ltd., Watford, UK). Coated samples were analyzed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) as previously described in reference 70 (link). Briefly, the microscope was operated in secondary electron imaging mode with an acceleration voltage of 15 keV, an extraction voltage of 1.8 kV, and a working distance of 10 to 11 mm. Fungal and actinobacteria spores were identified by morphological features and counted in 100 randomly selected imaged fields at ×3,000 magnification. The spore counts were given as the number of spores per cubic meter of air.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was used to study the morphology and structural features of the produced cocrystals. Selfadhesive carbon mounts were used to mount samples on aluminum pin stubs (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK). SEM images of the mounted samples were collected using an FEI Quanta 400 scanning electron microscope [16] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Morphological Analysis of Crystal Forms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of crystal forms was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Self-adhesive carbon mounts were used to mount samples on aluminum pin stubs (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK). SEM images of the mounted samples were collected using a FEI Quanta 400 scanning electron microscope (Cambridge, UK) under vacuum and XTM microscope control software, version 2.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!