The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Normalization beads

Manufactured by Standard BioTools

Normalization beads are a type of lab equipment used for sample preparation. They are designed to ensure consistent and reproducible results by normalizing sample volumes or concentrations prior to downstream analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using normalization beads

1

Robust CyTOF Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To avoid batch variation effects, all samples were stained with the same batch of antibodies and on the same day. All samples were acquired in 1 day to avoid instrument signal fluctuation. Antibodies (listed in Table S1) were either pre-conjugated from the manufacturer (Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA) or conjugated in-house with the appropriate metal isotopes as previously described (24 (link)). Cells were thawed and 5.106 PBMCs were transferred per well. As previously described (24 (link)), PBMCs were incubated with Rhodium DNA-intercalator (Fluidigm), first stained with the primary surface antibody mix for 1 h, and then stained with the secondary surface antibody mix for 15 min. Next, samples were resuspended in 1.6% PFA and incubated 20 min. Cells were finally incubated 30 min in permeabilization buffer with 1 μM Iridium DNA-intercalator before a 4°C overnight incubation in 1.6% PFA with 0.1 μM Iridium DNA intercalator. For acquisition, cells were washed and filtered through a cell strainer cap of a 5-ml polystyrene round-bottom tube (BD Biosciences). Normalization beads (Fluidigm) were added to each sample. Then, samples were acquired using a mass cytometer (CyTOF-I; Fluidigm) and following the standard procedure recommended by the manufacturer. An average of 200,264 ± 13,472 events was acquired per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mass Cytometry Sample Preparation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intercalated samples were washed once with CSM and twice with double distilled water, and then re-suspended in a solution of normalization beads (Fluidigm). Samples were filtered prior to mass cytometry analysis through a 35-μm membrane and analyzed at a flow rate of approximately 500 cells/sec on a CyTOF 2.0 mass cytometry instrument (Fluidigm). Samples were normalized and de-barcoded using software as described previously (25 (link), 26 (link)). For the gating strategy see Fig. S2. Data were analyzed using viSNE analysis (27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized PBMC Cryopreservation and Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed, rapidly transferred to warm X-VIVO™ containing a nuclease (Benzonase® Nuclease, Merck Millipore, 25 U/mL), followed by centrifugation and resting in X-VIVO™ for 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. The resting time was optimized in set-up experiments (data not shown). Viability staining was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions with Cell-ID™ cisplatin (Fluidigm). PBMCs from each individual were split into two aliquots; one was not stimulated, and the other was stimulated with 50 ng/mL TNF for 12 min. Stimulation time and dose had been defined after a series of TNF time and dose titrations. Cells in both samples were fixed in proteomic stabilizer (Smart Tubes Inc.) for 10 min and stored at −80°C until barcoding and staining. All cells were barcoded simultaneously with 20-plex Cell-ID™ barcoding kits (Fluidigm) as recommended by the manufacturer. After pooling, surface staining, methanol-permeabilization, and intracellular staining were carried out. PBMCs were then stained with MaxPar DNA intercalator overnight (Fluidigm) and analyzed the following day on a Helios mass cytometer (Fluidigm) after addition of normalization beads (Fluidigm). Raw FCS-files were bead-normalized, concatenated, and debarcoded with software tools from Fluidigm before subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-dimensional Immune Profiling by Mass Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Post-thaw, fixed samples were added to an erythrocyte lysis buffer (SmartTube) and underwent two rounds of erythrocyte lysis. Cells were then barcoded as previously described84 (link). In summary, 20-well barcode plates were prepared with a combination of two Pd isotopes out of a pool of six (102Pd, 104Pd, 105Pd, 106Pd, 108Pd, 110Pd) and added to the cells in 0.02% saponin/phosphate buffered saline. Samples were pooled and stained with metal-conjugated antibodies collectively to minimize experimental variation. The panels for the different cohorts are listed in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4. Intracellular staining was performed in methanol-permeabilized cells. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with an iridium-containing intercalator (Fluidigm). Before mass cytometry analysis, cells were filtered through a 35-μm membrane and resuspended in a solution of normalization beads (Fluidigm).
Barcoded and stained cells were analysed on a Helios mass cytometer (Fluidigm) at an event rate of 500 to 1,000 cells per second. The data were normalized using Normalizer v0.1 MATLAB Compiler Runtime85 (link) and debarcoded with a single-cell MATLAB debarcoding tool84 (link). Gating was performed using Cytobank (cytobank.org). Gating strategies for the different cohorts are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mass Cytometry Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intercalated samples were washed with once with CSM and twice with
double distilled water, and then re-suspended in a solution of normalization
beads (Fluidigm). Samples were filtered prior to mass cytometry analysis through
a 35-µm membrane and analyzed at a flow rate of approximately 500
cells/sec. Samples were normalized and de-barcoded as described previously
(15 (link),16 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Dimensional CyTOF Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh SF and blood were split and either immediately (within 30 minutes of sampling) fixed with high-purity paraformaldehyde (time T0) or incubated at 37°C, 5% CO 2 at a 1:1 ratio with RPMI 1640 containing brefeldin A and monensin for 6 h (time T6) with Intercalator-103Rh added 15 min prior to fixation. All samples were then stored at -80°C. Samples were lysed with Permeabilization Buffer (eBioscience), barcoded and cells stained in Maxpar staining buffer (Fluidigm) with antibodies listed in supplementary table S4. Samples were run on a Helios instrument alongside normalization beads (Fluidigm). Raw CyTOF files were debarcoded using Fluidigm software, and the .fcs files were pre-processed in FlowJo using biaxial manual gating as shown in supplementary figure S10. These pre-processed files were analysed using a modified custom R workflow 48 (link) with cell populations clustered using ConsensusClusterPlus 49 (link) and FlowSOM algorithms 10 -a highly recommended clustering method. 50 (link) Clusters were merged and annotated as defined in supplementary table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!