The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

201 protocols using matlab 2018b

1

Multimodal Image Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using the software pco.camware version 3.09. Image processing and analysis were performed in ImageJ (v1.52i, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MN, USA) and MATLAB 2018b (Mathworks). Calculations were performed in MATLAB 2018b (Mathworks), Rstudio (version 1.2.5019), and R (version 3.6.1). Plots and figures were generated using GraphPad Prism (Version 6.07, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), OriginPro (Version 9.0.0 G, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, USA), and MATLAB 2018b (Mathworks). Formatting and arrangement of figures was done using Adobe Illustrator CS5 (Adobe Systems, Inc., v15.0.0, San Jose, CA, USA) and Affinity Designer (Version 1.9.3, Serif (Europe) Ltd.). The Java-based software was developed and compiled using Eclipse Mars.2 (Release 4.5.2, IDE for Java Developers, Eclipse Foundation, Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and using parts of the source code of SpermQ (v0.1.7,39 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Glioma Imaging Protocol: Diffusion Parametrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described [32 (link)], the MD and MK parametric maps were calculated after precedent smoothing using the MR Body Diffusion tool® V.1.4.0 in syngo.via frontier® (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Image and volume of interest (VOI) analyses were performed on the parametric maps using MIPAV 10.0.0 (http://mipav.cit.nih.gov; access date 1 May 2021). The entire tumor volume was manually delineated on multiple slices on the FLAIR images, as indicated by T2 signal alterations. We minimized potential sampling bias by encompassing T2 hyperintense areas showing peritumoral edema and perifocal infiltrative zone [37 (link),38 (link)]. Then, we transformed the MD and MK parametric maps on the transverse FLAIR-weighted images’ matrix using in-house Matlab-based algorithms (Matlab 2018b, MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Subsequently, we extracted the MK and MD intensity values voxel-wisely from the whole-brain MD and MK parametric maps and processed them for further analysis using Matlab (Matlab 2018b, MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biomarker Selection and Prediction Models for Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
General data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to compare the relationship between each potential biomarker and CA. Correlation coefficients greater than 0.15 with P-value equal to or less than 0.5 was used as the biomarker selection criteria based on previous studies. The biomarker results were expressed in mean and standard deviation. MLR and principal component analyses were conducted to obtain the BA prediction models of MLR and PCA. Mathematical calculations for the KDM were conducted by MATLAB 2018b of MathWorks Inc. (Natick, MA, USA). Spiro–Wilk test was used to assess whether data was normally distributed prior to conducting the comparative analysis. Comparisons between active and less-active groups were done through t-test. The significance level (α) was set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cognitive Assessment in PD and DT Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We compared the MoCA scores, MMSE scores, and intraoperative memory test scores to evaluate cognitive behavior of the PD and the DT patients. We also compared the intraoperative memory test scores between the PD and DT patients in subgroups based on cognitive impairment defined by the MoCA scale6 (link),27 (link),28 (link), including a subgroup with high MoCA scores (26–30, indicating normal cognition), a subgroup with medium MoCA scores (18–25, indicating mild cognitive impairment), and a subgroup with low MoCA scores (11–17, indicating mild dementia). This grouping criterion is in line with the cognitive impairment levels defined by the MoCA scale29 (link), which is believed to be superior to the MMSE in detecting cognitive changes30 (link)–32 (link). Correlation analyses were performed to evaluate the relationships between the intraoperative memory test scores and the preoperative cognitive assessment scores. Descriptive statistics are reported as the means and standard deviations. Student’s t test was used to compare variables between the PD and DT patients. Statistical analyses were performed using MATLAB 2018b (Mathworks, USA). The significance level was set at an alpha of P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3D Brain Imaging and Cell Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data processing and analyses were performed with customized MATLAB (MathWorks, MATLAB 2018b) scripts and Python (v3.7) scripts. The data collection and hardware control were performed with LABVIEW (2019 version) and our previously developed graphical user interface (sLFdriver45 (link), v2.0). The 3D volumes of Drosophila brain in Fig. 6 were rendered using Imaris (v9.0.1). The 3D rendering of the volumes in the supplementary videos was carried out using Voltex modules in Amira (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Amira 2019). The 3D tracking of blood cells in the vessels of the zebrafish larvae and the neutrophil in the vessels of mouse liver was carried out automatically using Imaris (v9.0.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Raman Spectroscopy of Ex Vivo Kidney Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Raman spectroscopy system (Horiba Jobin Yvon-XploRA PLUS) collected Raman spectra of ex vivo kidney tissue samples (Figure 1b). A 532 nm laser was projected onto room-temperature kidney sections, and the resulting Raman scattering between 700 and 3500 cm−1 was recorded through a CCD camera. Measurements were taken at various pathological sites, including glomeruli and other structures within the cortical region.
The collected Raman spectra were processed using MATLAB 2018b (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) with baseline and background correction [38 (link)], spectral smoothing through a Savitzky-Golay filter [39 (link)], and normalization based on water content (3100–3400 cm−1). For multivariate and machine learning analysis, the biological fingerprint region (800–1800 cm−1) was selected, which contains molecular information including proteins, lipids, and other tissue constituents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Longitudinal Assessment of Weight, Behavior, and Stool in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight measurements, open field tests, and stool collection were performed longitudinally with the 18-month-old group (called group 18). Weights were measured every month from 2 to 18 months of age. Open field testing was performed at the age of 4, 12, and 18 months for all mice in group 18 (Figure 1A). They were allowed to move freely in a box with an area of 1 m2 for 10 min and were tracked using a customized program written in MATLAB 2018b environment (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Locomotor activity as the distance travelled and anxiety-like behavior as percentage of time in the inner zone were measured. Stools harvested for 1 h were weighed, heated at 60 °C overnight under ventilation, and weighed again, in order to measure the percentage of water and the number of stools.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Survival Analysis Model Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ML analyses, survival curve visualization, Cox proportional hazards models, and k-fold cross-validation paired sample t-test were conducted in MATLAB 2018b (Mathworks, Natick, MA). mRMR feature selection was conducted using the Feature Selection Library MATLAB toolbox26 . Construction of the online calculator (Supplemental Methods) and all remaining statistics and were computed in RStudio 1.1.456 (RStudio, Boston, MA) with R 3.5.1 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) with packages “pROC27 (link),” “compareC25 (link),” “e1071,” and “tableone.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Neuroscience Data Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were conducted using custom-written scripts and functions in MATLAB 2018b (MathWorks). Sessions with no spiking activity were excluded from analysis (2 rats had no PLC activity throughout rehabilitation and were excluded from PLC analyses, 1 rat had no PLC or DLS activity in the first two rehabilitation sessions).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predicting Prostate Cancer Midline Extension

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used two prospectively-maintained databases: one that linked fusion biopsy to pathology and MRI results, and another that described lesion features on WMP. Custom Matlab 2018b (MathWorks, Natick, MA) scripts were written to extract and compute all data features, also known as covariates when using standard multivariable analysis terminology. All imaging and pathology reports in patient charts were checked manually by four separate authors (SRZ, DCJ, JJY, JB) to ensure accuracy of the extracted data.
In addition to obtaining standard clinicopathologic features used in routine diagnosis and assessment—age, PSA-related features, prostate volume, biopsy results, mpMRI results, etc.—biopsy coordinates were used to compute various spatial features that were likely predictive of bilateral or midline extension of csCaP (Figure 3). Examples include but are not limited to: distance between prostate midline and nearest positive biopsy core, distance between midline and the nearest suspicious PI-RADSv2 lesion, and the presence of a negative biopsy core between a biopsy-confirmed lesion and midline. All features involving distance measures were scaled to a 40cc prostate, approximated as a sphere. A full list of features considered can be found in Supplemental Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!