The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

79 protocols using dionex ics 3000

1

Monosaccharide Characterization of Pelleted Product

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sugar composition of the pelleted product was characterized using high‐performance anion‐exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC‐PAD) (Dionex ICS‐3000; Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Before analysis, the samples were hydrolyzed with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as follows. One mg of the sample was dissolved in 1 ml of 2 M TFA solution containing .01 g/l myo‐inositol as an internal standard. The solution was heated at 120 °C for 3 h to hydrolyze all non‐crystalline polysaccharides, and then centrifuged. The supernatant was dried overnight under nitrogen flow and re‐suspended in 1 ml Milli‐Q water. The solution was finally filtered through a .2 μm Nylon syringe filter, and analyzed using an HPAEC‐PAD Dionex ICS‐3000 equipped with CarboPac PA‐1 4 × 250 mm column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). For the separation of the neutral and acidic monosaccharides, different gradients of the eluents were used (300 mM sodium hydroxide, 200 mM sodium hydroxide with 170 mM sodium acetate, 1 M sodium acetate and MilliQ water) with a P1 column set to 22 °C as previously reported (McKee et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Bulb Sugars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bulbs at 0 d, 14 d, 28 d, and 70 d were collected to measure sucrose, glucose, and fructose content. The three components were measured as described by Liu et al. (2021) (link). Differences between groups were assessed by analysis of variance using the SAS software, v. 9.2.
For the sample preparation, bulb scales were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen, and 1.00 g of sample was added to 100 ml of ultrapure water and mixed through ultrasonic shaking for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm filter membrane and diluted 2000 times with diluted water. The contents of the three above sugar were determined by ion chromatograph (DIONEX ICS-3000, Thermo, USA) using a DIONEX ICS-3000 ion chromatography system (Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Root Nonstructural Carbohydrate Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all fine (< 2 mm) and coarse (≥ 2 mm) sampled roots, nonstructural carbohydrate pools (i.e. glucose, fructose, sucrose and starch) were quantified as described in Mariem et al. (2020 (link)). Briefly, 25 mg of ground root samples was treated with 0.5 ml of 100% ethanol and 0.5 ml of 80% ethanol. These samples were heated in a thermomixer (70°C, 90 min, 1100 rpm) and then centrifuged. The resulting supernatant fractions were used to determine soluble sugars (i.e. sucrose, glucose, fructose), using an ion chromatography system (ICS‐3000 Dionex; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), after previous sample dilution with water. The starch content was determined in the pellet by adding KOH (0.2 M) and adjusting the pH with acetic acid. The extractions were performed by using a kit that contained amyloglucosidase (R‐Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany). The absorbance was measured at 340 nm using a spectrophotometer. The different NSC forms were expressed as mg g−1 per dry weight (DW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Soluble Carbohydrates in Leaf Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf samples (200 mg) were lyophilized, ground and incubated with 80% ethanol in water bath at 80 C for 15 min. Total soluble carbohydrates were determined colorimetrically by the phenolsulfuric acid method (Dubois et al., 1956) (link) using glucose (Sigma-Aldrich) as standard. Aliquots (1 mL) were deionized using Dowex (Sigma-Aldrich) ion exchange columns, containing cation 50 Â 8 (100e200 mesh) and anion 1 Â 8 (52e100 mesh) exchange resins. The eluate was adjusted to pH 7.0 adding 0.4 M NH 4 OH. After the purification, samples were lyophilized and concentred to 400 mg mL À1 for total carbohydrate using deionized water. Soluble carbohydrates were identified by high-resolution ion-exchange chromatography (ICS 3000 Dionex, Thermo Scientific, USA) coupled to an amperometric pulse detector (HPAEC/PAD), using CarboPac PA À1 column (2 Â 250 mm). Oligosaccharides were excluded isocratically with 250 mM NaOH in a flow rate of 0.25 mL min À1 . The peaks detected were compared with commercial standards to glucose, fructose, sucrose, raffinose and stachyose (Sigma-Aldrich). Starch was extracted using 10 mg of residual soluble carbohydrates obtained from leaves and quantified according to the enzymatic method described by Caccere et al. (2013) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tailings Pond Water Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A tailings pond water sample (designated TPW) was collected from a Syncrude test pit (GIS 57.0380885, −111.5407123) courtesy of Warren Zubot (Syncrude). The test pit was excavated in 1993 and filled with aged recycled water from the Mildred Lake Settling Basin (MLSB). A second tailings pond water sample (designated 2m) was supplied by L. Gieg (University of Calgary) and collected at a water depth of 2 m from a Suncor tailings pond (GIS 56.9923073, −111.4979146).
For ion chromatography, environmental samples were diluted 10-fold in MilliQ water and filtered through a GF/F filter (Whatman) by vacuum. Samples were analyzed using an ICS-3000 Dionex. For cation analysis, the eluent was 20 mM methyl sulfonic acid run at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 for 30 mins on a Dionex Ionpac 4-mm column (column temperature, 30°C). The eluted cations were detected with a CSRS 300 4-mm Suppressor onto a conductivity cell detector. For the anion analysis, the eluent was MilliQ water and 100 mM KOH. Potassium hydroxide was run on a gradient with a flow of 0.25 ml min−1. This was run through an Ionpac AS 18 2-mm column onto a conductivity cell detector. For total organic carbon (TOC) analysis, samples were measured using a Shimadzu TOC-VCHS pyrolyser fitted with an SSM 5000A solid sample module and running TOC-Control V software v. 2.00.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Ileal SCFA by Ion Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As reported by previous study, short chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in ileal digesta were detected by using an ion chromatographic method (Liu et al., 2017 (link)). About 0.5 g of ileal digesta sample was mixed with 8 ml of distilled water, and after 30 min of ultrasonic treatment, the mixture was centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min to achieve the supernatant. We filtered the diluted supernatant using a 0.22 μm filter and finally injected the supernatant into a high-performance ion chromatograph (ICS 3000 Dionex, United States). SCFAs were separated by an AG11 guard column and an AS11 analytical column under the gradient condition (0–5 min, 0.8–1.5 mm; 5–10 min, 1.5–2.5 mm; and 10–15 min, 2.5 mm); the flow rate was 1.0 ml/min. The gradient was carried out with potassium hydroxide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of ileal and colonic short-chain fatty acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ileal and colonic digesta samples (0.5 g) were weighed into a 10 mL polypropylene tube and 8 mL of deionized water was added. After using an ultrasonic bath for 30 min, the mixture was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min. The suspension was diluted (1:50) with water and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. A 25 µL sample solution was extracted and analyzed for the VFA, including acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid by a HPLC (ICS-3000 Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), as described by Liu et al. [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ion Chromatography for Carbohydrate Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The system for ion chromatography, DIONEX ICS 3000 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), consisting of a quaternary pump (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), was equipped with autosampler ICS AS-DV 50 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and coupled to a pulsed amperometric detector with a gold-working electrode and Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Carbohydrates were separated on a Carbo Pac®PA100 high-performance anion-exchange column (4 × 250 mm) (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) set to 30 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 600 mM sodium hydroxide, 500 mM sodium acetate, and ultrapure water, and the composition was changed during the time of analysis, as reported in detail in our previous work [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Carbohydrates and Lignin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for carbohydrate and acid-insoluble lignin content analysis were prepared using a standard NREL two-stage acid hydrolysis protocol [28 ]. Acid hydrolysis generates soluble sugars and acid-insoluble lignin residues, where the later was dried overnight at 105 °C in an oven (Heratherm oven, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) and weighed to obtain the acid-insoluble lignin (Klason lignin) content. The soluble sugars were analyzed for carbohydrate constituents by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) (Dionex ICS-3000, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Separation of soluble sugars was achieved utilizing a CarboPac-PA1 2 × 250 mm analytical column equipped with a CarboPac PA1 2 × 50 mm guard column (both from Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA), operated at 30 °C, with Milli-Q water as a mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.250 mL/min. The total run time was 35 min. External calibration curves were established using the standard solutions of arabinose, galactose, glucose, mannose, and xylose. The standard solutions were prepared from their corresponding monosaccharide (> 99%) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Volatile Acids by Ion-Exchange Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatile acids, such as formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, and so on, were analyzed via ion-exchange chromatography on a DIONEX ICS-3000 (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, United States). Briefly, the samples after fermented with three starters were filtered through Dionex OnGuardTM II RP and H cartridge (Thermo, Sunnyvale, CA, United States) to remove interfering substances and was loaded into the instrument according to the instructions (Zhang and He, 2010 ). Volatile acids in samples were the sum of the content of each acid calculated with the standard solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!