The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pasw version 18

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States, Japan

PASW version 18.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It is designed for data analysis, data management, and predictive modeling. The software provides a range of tools for researchers, analysts, and decision-makers to explore, analyze, and visualize data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

118 protocols using pasw version 18

1

Statistical Analysis of Oocyte Scores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental values for quantitative real-time PCR and The oocyte scores were statistically compared using one-sided Student's t-tests using PASW version 18 (IBM). The oocyte scores were statistically compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test using PASW version 18 (IBM). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analyses in Biomedical Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), Analyse-it Method Evaluation Edition software (version 2.26; Analyse-it Software Ltd., Leeds, UK), and R statistical software (version 3.6.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. All tests were two-sided, and differences with P<0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Predicting Metabolically Unhealthy Obesity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as means ± SD for continuous measures except for skewed continuous variables, which are presented as the median (interquartile range, 25–75%) or as proportions for categorical variables. Differences between groups were tested by the student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the χ2-test or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables. Multiple logistic regression analysis with backward selection was used to determine independent associations between clinical and biochemical variables and future conversion to MUO as a binary variable. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for independent variables included in logistic models, with a 1-SD increment used for odds ratio calculations for continuous measurements. We assessed the presence of nonlinearity in the final model by inserting quadratic transformations of the three continuous variables that it contained into the model. The presence of interaction was tested in multivariate models by testing the significance of first order interaction terms. All statistical analyses were performed using PASW version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Irisin Levels and Prediabetes/T2D

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as means ± SDs or proportions, except for skewed variables, which are presented as medians (interquartile range, 25–75 %). One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s posthoc test, and the Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare the differences between the irisin tertiles. A linear-by-linear association χ2-test was used to perform trend analysis between the tertiles. The spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to compare the irisin and clinical and laboratory measurements. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to calculate an odds ratio (OR) for the presence of pre-diabetes/T2D. The results of the analyses are presented as OR with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). All statistical analyses were performed using PASW version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Citation Patterns in Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected annual citation counts through December 2015 using Scopus. Citation data were updated as of 6 January 2016. We compared cumulative citation counts among positive, neutral, and negative trials graphically. Annual citation rates were calculated by dividing the total number of citations by the time elapsed from the earlier of the print or online publication dates and the end of 2015. Jadad quality scores were calculated by two study authors for each of the included trials; discrepancies were resolved by consensus [10 (link)]. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between trial size and annual citation rate. Data were collected and analyzed using Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The STROBE Statement checklist for observational studies is included as an additional file (see Additional file 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Agonist Response Curve Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRCs to agonists were fitted by non-linear regression using SigmaPlot software (version 11.0; SPSS, Inc.). The maximal responses (Emax) and the negative logarithm of the concentration at which agonists produce 50% of the maximum response were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using PASW version 18.0 software (SPSS, Inc.). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of ≥3 independent repeats. Differences within groups were compared using an unpaired Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by LSD post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Polyp Detection Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Student t-test was used to compare numerical variables between groups. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent variables associated with missed polyps or patients with missed polyps. ORs and 95% CIs and their associated P-values were calculated for per-polyp and per-patient associations. Values were considered statistically significant when P<0.05. All statistics were performed using predictive analytics software PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ALDH1 Expression and Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed by using PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Evaluation of pathologic differences and molecular subtypes according to ALDH1 expression were assessed by using the Pearson chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier estimates and curves were prepared for the survival outcomes. Multivariate analysis by using the Cox proportional hazards model was performed to assess the independent significance of pathologic factors and survival probabilities. Hazard ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed to provide quantitative information about the relevance of the statistical results. All p-values were obtained by performing two-sided testing, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pregnancy Outcomes After Frozen Embryo Transfer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were retrospectively divided into the pregnant and the non-pregnant groups after FET. The variables under study were compared between the two groups by Wilcoxon rank sum test for independent samples using PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were expressed as mean±standard deviation unless specified otherwise. The value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nonparametric Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as numbers (percentages) for categorical variables and medians (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables. Because the data were nonparametric, Tukey's box and whisker plots were used to show centrality and dispersion. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test with post-hoc paired comparisons using the Bonferroni method. All statistical analyses were performed using PASW version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!