The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using cytoscan hd chip

1

SNP Microarray Analysis of Chromosomal Aberrations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNP microarray analysis was used to determine chromosomal aberrations. Two types of SNP microarray chips were used, the Affymetrix 250K_NSP-chip, with ~250,000 probes across the genome and the Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chip, with ~750,000. The first 28 samples were analyzed with the Affymetrix 250K_NSP chip, and the remaining 36 samples with the Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chip. Analysis of the Affymetrix 250K_NSP chips was performed with the ‘Genotyping Console’ to determine the copy number values and the ‘GCT Browser’ to visualize the data (both from Affymetrix, Santa Clara, USA). Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chips were analyzed with ‘ChAS’. Different loci per chromosome were evaluated to adjust for partial gains or deletions. ~200 probes per gene locus were averaged to determine eventual copy number.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting CNVs in hiPSC-CMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect CNVs, genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from hiPSC-CMs using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Then, 250 ng of gDNA was digested with Nsp1 for 2 h at 37 °C. The digested DNA was purified and ligated with primer/adaptors at 16 °C for 3 h. Amplicons were generated by PCR using the primers provided by the manufacturer (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) on the ligation products. PCR was conducted according to the following protocol: 94 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 45 s, and 65 °C for 15 s, followed by extension at 68 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were then purified and digested for 35 min at 37 °C to fragment the amplified DNA. The fragmented DNA was then labeled with biotinylated nucleotides through terminal deoxynucleotide transferase for 4 h at 37 °C. DNA was hybridized to a pre-equilibrated CytoscanHD chip (Affymetrix) at 50 °C for 16–18 h. After washing and scanning the CytoscanHD chips, data analysis was performed using AGCC software 4.0 (Affymetrix), followed by a filtration of cancer markers based on the pathogen region from ClinVar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromosomal Aberration Detection Using SNP Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used SNP microarray data that was acquired for clinical purposes on UM samples to determine chromosomal aberrations. Two types of SNP microarray chips were used. The Affymetrix 250K_NSP, chip, which contains roughly 250 000 probes across the genome and the Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chip, with approximately 750 000 probes across the genome. A first set of 28 samples was analyzed with the Affymetrix 250K_NSP chip. Since this chip was no longer available, the remaining 36 samples were measured with the Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chip.
The analysis of the Affymetrix 250K_NSP chips was performed with the ‘Genotyping Console’ to determine the copy number values and the ‘GCT Browser’ to visualize the data (both from Affymetrix). The Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chips were analysed with ‘ChAS’ (Affymetrix). The chromosomal aberrations that were found for both chip versions were put in a database for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic and Clinical Analysis of Uveal Melanoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) cohort includes clinical, histopathological, and genetic information on 64 UM cases, enucleated between 1999 and 2008. Clinical information was collected from the Integral Cancer Center West patient records and updated in 2019. For each sample, part of the tumor was snap frozen with 2-methyl butane and used for mRNA and DNA isolation, while the remainder was embedded in paraffin after 48 hours of fixation in 4% neutral-buffered formalin and sent for histological analysis. Chromosome status was determined with the Affymetrix 250K_NSP-chip and Affymetrix Cytoscan HD chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California, United States of America). RNA was isolated with the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) and mRNA expression was determined with the HT-12 v4 chip (Illumina, San Diego, California, United States of America). Statistical analyses of the LUMC cohort were carried out in SPSS, version 25 (IBM Corp). For survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test were performed with death due to metastases as endpoint. Cases that died of another or unknown cause were censored. The two subpopulations that were compared in each analysis were determined by splitting the total cohort along the median value of mRNA expression for each analyzed gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fetal Genomic DNA Analysis via CMA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fetal genomic DNA was extracted from cord blood (1 mL) and amniotic fluid (10 mL) using DNA extraction kits from Qiagen (USA) and BioChain (USA), respectively. The DNA of fetuses was then subjected to CMA. The genomic DNA samples were purified, hybridized with microarrays, and analyzed in accordance with the standard procedures provided by Affymetrix. A genome-wide CytoScan™ HD chip (Affymetrix, USA) with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) probe was used. The corresponding ChAS software and related bioinformatics methods were used to analyze the CMA results. Copy number variations (CNVs) were determined using the scatter plot distribution of the DNA fragment copy number. We compared the CNVs using reference databases, including the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation), DECIPHER (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/PostGenomics/decipher), Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) (http://www.omim.org), and University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) databases (http://www.genome.UCSC.edu/). CNVs were classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, likely benign, and those with a variant of uncertain significance [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detecting Copy Number Variations in PDX Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from PDX cells at low (p3), middle (p15) and high (p30) in vitro passages using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). For analysis, genomic DNA was hybridized to an Affymetrix CytoScan HD chip (Affymetrix) containing approximately 2.6 million markers of which almost 750,000 are SNPs. Constitutional copy number variants were removed by filtering against the Database of Genomic Variants (Oct. 2016). Copy number variation analyses were performed using ChAS software. The analyses of xenografts and the corresponding patient tumors were reported previously10 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Confirming WES Results via Chromosomal Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm our WES results, we performed chromosomal microarray testing using the CytoScan HD chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Moreover, we analyzed data with ChAS software (Affymetrix), which had a calling threshold of 20 consecutive probes encompassing at least 25 kb in length. Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood samples. The first strand of cDNA was synthesized with this DNA sample as a template and designed primers. Then, the cDNA fragments were amplified by PCR with the primers, labeled, and hybridized. We analyzed pathogenic CNVs using Agilent Cytogenomics software (Agilent Technologies).
All the reported CNVs were subject to the build 37 of human genome/hg19 on NCBI. The screened CNVs for comparative analysis had to meet the following conditions: (1) deletions ≥50 kb/25 markers; duplications ≥100 kb/50 markers; (2) <50% overlap with known segmental duplications (SD); and (3) not found in the control populations cataloged in the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV). We selected 178 individuals without heart disease from our local database as controls. Other controls were selected from the SNP database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/), 1000 Genomes Project (1000G, https://1000genomes.org), and the DGV (https://dgv.tcag.ca/dgv/app/home).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Saliva-based DNA Genotyping and Replication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from saliva samples collected using the Oragene 250 saliva collection kit (DNA Genotek; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). DNA was extracted using an automated extraction instrument, AutoPure LS (Qiagen; Valencia, CA), and samples were genotyped using the Illumina Human OmniExpress Chip (Illumina; San Diego, CA) according to protocols provided by the manufacture's. Technical replication was performed using the Affymetrix CytoScan HD chip according to the manufacturer's protocol (Affymetrix; Santa Clara, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!