The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Display system

Manufactured by Cambridge Research Systems
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Display ++ system is a high-performance computer-controlled display device designed for visual research and psychophysical experiments. It provides precise control over the presentation of visual stimuli on a display screen. The core function of the Display ++ system is to generate and present visual stimuli with a high degree of temporal and spatial accuracy.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using display system

1

Multimodal Sensory Perception Experiment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were generated using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) and Psychtoolbox extensions (Brainard, 1997 (link); Pelli, 1997 (link)). The visual stimulus was a stationary white circle with a diameter of 3.5° presented on a grey background in the center of the screen. Auditory stimuli were pure tones of 1000 Hz created in MATLAB and presented binaurally at 75 dB (measured at the auditory source) via Sennheiser HD 280 pro headphones laid flat, directly under the center of the display, with earpieces facing the ceiling to approximate the same spatial location as the visual signal. Visual and auditory stimuli were delivered through a Display ++ system with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and an AudioFile stimulus processor, respectively (Cambridge Research Systems, Rochester, UK). For all experiments, participants sat in front of the display 60 cm away from the screen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Perception: Visual and Auditory Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were generated using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, United States) and Psychtoolbox extensions (Brainard, 1997 (link); Pelli, 1997 (link)). The visual stimulus was a stationary white circle with a diameter of 3.5° presented on a grey background in the center of the screen. Auditory stimuli were pure tones of 1,000 Hz created in MATLAB and presented binaurally at 70 dB (measured at the auditory source) via a speaker (Fantech HellScream GS 201, Nepal) directly under the center of the display to approximate the same spatial location as the visual signal. Visual and auditory stimuli were delivered through a Display ++ system with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and an AudioFile stimulus processor, respectively (Cambridge Research Systems, Rochester, United Kingdom). For all experiments, participants sat in front of the display 60 cm away from the screen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multisensory Perception Threshold Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The visual stimulus was an isotropic two-dimensional Gaussian blob subtending 3.5˚ visual angle presented on a uniform grey background for 30 ms. The contrast of the visual stimulus was set to either near- or supra-threshold levels based on the participant’s detection threshold measured in during the estimation of unisensory detection thresholds (see below). The auditory stimulus was a 30 ms 1000 Hz tone presented at a dB level set at either near- or supra- individual detection threshold levels. All stimuli were generated using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) and Psychtoolbox extensions (Brainard, 1997 (link); Pelli, 1997 (link)). Auditory and visual stimuli were presented via an AudioFile Stimulus Processor and a Display++ system with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, respectively (Cambridge Research Systems, Rochester, UK) in order to preserve precise timing. Auditory stimuli were presented via a speaker (Fantech HellScream GS 201, Nepal) that was centered underneath the display to align with presentation of the visual stimuli.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multisensory Integration: Visual and Tactile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The visual stimulus was a 33 ms white circle of 3.5° centered around a fixation cross, presented via the Psychophysics Toolbox using a Display + + system with a refresh rate of 120 Hz (Cambridge Research Systems, Rochester, United Kingdom). The 50 ms tactile stimulus of 50 Hz was generated using the PiezoTac tactor device (Engineering Acoustic, Casselberry, FL, United States). To approximate the same central location as the visual stimulus, the tactile stimulus was always presented to the tip of the participant’s right index finger positioned directly below the center of the display.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!