The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using envisiontm system

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor sections of nude mice xenografts were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using EnVisionTM System (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Primary antibodies used in IHC were KLF5 (Abcam, 1:200), Beclin-1 (CST, 1:200) and ATG5 (CST, 1:200). Immunohistochemistry was performed following the previously described method 16 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Osteoblast Differentiation and Matrix Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differentiation of the osteoblasts was characterized by determination of the synthesis of bone matrix proteins. Cells were seeded at a concentration of 60 000 cells per cm2 and cultivated for 4 weeks. For immunohistochemistry, the cell culture medium was decanted. The specimens were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Specific antibodies were used to detect extracellular matrix proteins by immunohistochemical staining.
Anti-collagen type I, polyclonal was obtained from BioTrend Chemikalien GmbH, Germany, the antibodies anti-osteocalcin and anti-osteonectin were obtained from Takara, Shiga, Japan and anti-osteopontin from CHEMICON International Inc., Temecula, USA. For immunohistochemical staining, the DAKO EnVisionTM + −system was applied. The stained cell cultures were controlled and analysed by light microscopy. Richardson staining was accomplished with a blue dye (Methylen blue Azur II).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At sacrifice, the livers containing tumours of each mouse were sampled, fixed in zinc‐formalin and sliced to 4‐µm sections. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the EnvisionTM + system (DAKO), and immunofluorescence staining was performed using the Opal Fluorescent IHC Kit (PerkinElmer) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The MI‐77 MW rapid processor (Azumaya) was used for some reactions in the process. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the following antibodies: anti‐Ki‐67 (GTX16667, GeneTex); anti‐CD31 (ab28364, Abcam); anti‐αSMA (ab5694, Abcam); anti‐FAP (ab53066, Abcam); anti‐CD4 (#25229, Cell Signaling); anti‐CD8α (#98941, Cell Signaling); and anti‐FOXP3 (#12653, Cell Signaling). Immunofluorescence staining was performed utilizing the following antibodies: anti‐F4/80 (ab6640, Abcam); anti‐NOS2 (sc‐651, Santa Cruz); anti‐CD163 (ab182422, Abcam); and anti‐VEGF‐A (sc‐152, Santa Cruz). A confocal microscope (FV1000D, Olympus) was used for fluorescence observation. For all the studies, randomly selected fields (100 × magnification) for every large metastasis (ie those> 1 mm2) were analysed using WinROOF version 3.6 (Mitani).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Tumor Angiogenesis in A549 Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor sections from FFPE A549 xenograft tumors were stained for p-4E-BP1 [Thr37/46 (#2855), dilution 1:5000; Cell Signaling]. Detection was performed using CSA II signal amplification system (Dako). Sections were scored by two pathologists (H.M.H. and S.M.W.) using the semiquantitative H-score that takes into consideration the staining intensity (0–3+) in conjunction with the percentage of viable tumor cells staining positively. H-score = (% at 0) * 0 + (% at 1+) * 1 + (% at 2+) * 2 + (% at 3+) * 3. Thus, this score produces a continuous variable that ranges from 0 to 300.
Tumor vessel density was analyzed in FFPE A549 xenograft tumors. Sections were stained for CD31 [Anti-CD31 (#ab28364), dilution 1:50; Abcam]. Detection was performed using the EnVisionTM+ system (Dako). Two pathologists (H.M.H. and S.M.W.) counted the number of CD31-positive vessels in 10 randomly clockwise selected fields (200× magnification) containing viable tumor. Vessel density was calculated as the sum of CD31-positive vessels in the 10 fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Colon Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dissected colon tissues were prepared for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the expression patterns of Nrf2, HO-1, GCLM, and GPx-2. Four-lm sections of 10% formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were cut on silanized glass slides and deparaffinized three times with xylene and rehydrated through graded alcohol bath. The deparaffinized sections were heated by using microwave and boiled twice for 6 min in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval. To diminish nonspecific staining, each section was treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide and 4% peptone casein blocking solution for 15 min. For the detection of respective protein expression, slides were incubated with Nrf2 (Bioworlde, USA), HO-1 (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), GCLM (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and GPx-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies at room temperature for 40 min in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20, and then developed using respective horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (rabbit, mouse, or goat) EnVisionTM System (Dako). The peroxidasebinding sites were detected by staining with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Dako). Finally, counterstaining was performed using Mayer’s hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sacrifice, hindlimbs/tumors were collected to perform a histopathologic characterization. Paraffin sections (3 μm thick) were cut, dewaxed and hydrated. Sections of all tumors were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic evaluation. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 (rabbit monoclonal, clone SP6, 1:100, NeoMarkers; RM-9106) was performed on those tumors/hindlimbs of treated mice, using the EnVisionTM+ System (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Bladder Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor sections of bladder cancer patients or nude mice xenografts were studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay using EnVisionTM System (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Primary antibodies used in IHC were KLF5 (Abcam, ab24331, 1:200), PCNA (Santa Cruz, sc-7907, 1:300), VEGFA (Abcam, ab46154, 1:150) and CD31 (Epitomics, 2530-1, 1:100). Staining signals were photographed using an Olympus BX51 Microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Average intensity score of the positive cells (0-none, 1-weak, 2-intermediate, and 3-strong) and percentage score of stained cells (1–0% to 25%, 2–25% to 50%, 3–50% to 75%, and 4–75% to 100%) were multiplied to get the total staining score, ranging from 0 to 12. Neovessel number in a bladder cancer tissue was counted following the previously described method [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

KEAP1 Expression in NSCLC Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NSCLC tissue specimens from 2015 to 2017 were used. These patients underwent tumour resection at Taihe Hospital. The tumour tissues were fixed in 4% formalin and embedded into tissue blocks. Serum samples were also collected from NSCLC advanced patients and healthy donors. The serum was stored in a −80 °C freezer. Immunohistochemistry analyses were performed using a DAKO EnVisionTM system (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Experimental steps were carried out according to the appropriate instructions. The following antibodies were used: KEAP1 from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Semi-quantitative analysis was used for the tissue staining results. The intensity was scored as follows: 0 negative; 1 weak; 2 moderate; and 3 strong. According to the degree of staining, negative and weak were considered low expression, and moderate and strong were considered high expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of JAK2 Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded JAK2wt and JAK2V617F+ EBs were prepared as described [80 (link)]. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 0.2% bovine serum albumin for 1 h, sections stained with primary antibody at RT for 1 h. EnVisionTM system (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) including horseradish peroxidase and diaminobenzidine (DAB+, Dako) was used for antibody detection; cell nuclei were counterstained by hematoxylin. Images were acquired using an Olympus BX51 inverted microscope equipped with ColorViewIII digital CCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Staining for Apoptosis and Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining procedure has been described [13 (link)]. Briefly, primary antibodies against CIP2A (ab84547, Abcam, UK), pAkt (pAkt1/2/3 Thr 308, Santa Cruz, sc-16,646-R), and SET (A302-262A, Bethyl Laboratories) were used at 1:100, 1:200, and 1:500 dilution for overnight incubation, respectively. The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin stain solution. Rabbit IgG was used as a control for antibody specificity. To detect the apoptosis, tumor tissue samples were stained the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) method with S7100 ApopTag® peroxidase in situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Merck Millipore Corporation, Darmstadt, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Staining signals were detected using the EnVisionTM system (Dako, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!