The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanozoomer 2.0 rs scanner

Manufactured by Hamamatsu Photonics
Sourced in Japan

The NanoZoomer 2.0 RS scanner is a high-resolution digital slide scanning system designed for microscopy applications. It captures detailed images of specimens with up to 40x magnification. The scanner utilizes advanced optics and imaging technologies to provide consistent, high-quality results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using nanozoomer 2.0 rs scanner

1

Histopathological Analysis of Liver and Ileum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histopathologic analysis, formalin-fixed liver and ileum samples were paraffin-embedded, sectioned (5 μm thickness), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The sections were randomly numbered prior to reading and observed by an experienced pathologist. Images were acquired using a NanoZoomer 2.0-RS scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Hamamatsu City, Japan) equipped with scanner software. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was performed following the manufacturer's instruction and counterstained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities of serum samples were measured using a dry chemistry analyzer (FUJI DRI-CHEM 4000ie; Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sliced into 5 μm-thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to a standard methodology. Areas of particular concern were analyzed using a NanoZoomer 2.0-RS scanner (Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Immune Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC slides were scanned by an Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0 RS scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) at a magnification of 40× and 20× for morphometric analyses of CD8 and CD56 expression, respectively. Next, morphometric analyses were performed with the use of a Cell^P program (Olympus). To analyze CD8+ cells, the three portal areas were selected for each slide. The surface of the total portal areas and all bile ducts in every portal area were measured. The number of CD8+ cells was counted and calculated per 1 µm2 of both the portal area and the bile duct area. Results were presented as an arithmetical mean ± standard deviation (SD).
To analyze anti-CD56 immunostaining, five regions within the portal area with positive CD56 expression were selected for each slide. The results were presented as a percentage of the area with CD56 expression in selected regions in relation to the entire area of the scanned image under 20× magnification (this area was 147,978.43 µm2). The method of analysis is illustrated in Figure 1. The threshold parameters were set using the HSI color space model in the following way: hue (H) 90°, saturation (S) 256°, intensity value (I) 123°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lung Injury Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh lung tissues were harvested and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for more than 24 h, and then embedded in paraffin and sectionalized. Each section was 5 μm thick, and was stained with hematoxylin eosin following the standard protocol. The areas of specific concern were analyzed after sealing by NanoZoomer 2.0-RS scanner (Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan). The lung injury score was measured as previously described [36] (link). Briefly, according to the four independent indicators: pulmonary hemorrhage, neutrophils infiltration, congestion in the pulmonary capillary, and septal thickening, the severity of the lung injury was graded from 0 to 4: 0, normal; 1, mild damage (< 25% injury of the field); 2, moderate damage (25% to 50% injury of the field); 3, severe damage (50% to 75% injury of the field); and 4, extremely severe damage (> 75% injury of the field). The score of each mouse was calculated as the mean of five randomly select fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Ki67 in Lung Arteries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Randomly chosen lower lobe pulmonary parenchyma portions were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 48 h, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Specific staining for Ki67 (Master Diagnostica, Granada, Spain) and haematoxylin was performed in 4 µm sections. An average size of 200 mm2 for each parenchyma was digitalized using the NanoZoomer 20RS scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan) at a magnification of 40x. The quantification of the positive Ki67 nuclei in the wall of the arteries was performed in the digitalized images using the NanoZoomer digital Pathology viewer (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan). A number of 24 arteries with a diameter between 30 and 100 µm were quantified per subject and the results represented as median (interquartile range) of Ki67 positive nuclei per artery (wall) and also adjusted by the arterial diameter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry of 14-3-3η in Synovial Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded synovial tissue sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Immunohistochemical staining was performed according to the standard avidin–biotin immunoperoxidase complex technique [4 (link)], and the sections were incubated with anti-14-3-3η (Augurex, 1:100 in 2% BSA and 2% goat serum) or mouse isotype IgG (DAKO Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA,1:100). Diaminobenzidine was used as a substrate for the detection of the labeled proteins, and the sections were counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. Slides were scanned using a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0-RS scanner. For quantitative immunohistochemistry, six random fields (at original magnification 20X) for each patient were captured using NPD viewing software, and the intensity of labeling in the tissue sections was analyzed using the immunohistochemistry quantification technique as previously described [5 (link)]. The results are expressed as the sum of labeling intensity (density) relative to the total area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Testicular Cell Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS and Bouin solution-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, as previously described26 (link). The Sertoli cells were labeled with an AMH goat primary antibody (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA). Leydig cells were stained with a rabbit anti-cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 (CYP11A1) antibody (1:250; Sigma Aldrich). A mouse M2A primary antibody (1:100; Abcam, Paris, France) was used for gonocyte immunolabeling. For the AMH and M2A antibodies, antigens were retrieved for 40 min at 80 °C in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.
A NanoZoomer 2.0-RS scanner (Hamamatsu, Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture pictures of the whole slides at 40x magnification. The surface area of 5 to 10 sections randomly selected within the whole explant were calculated with NDP.view software (Hamamatsu). ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to perform the stereological cell counting. Germ and Sertoli cells were identified and counted as intra-cordal AMH-negative and AMH-positive cells, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of TRPV Channels in Myometrium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded myometrial tissue sections were freed from paraffin and rehydrated before immunohistochemical staining was performed according to the standard avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase complex technique using the following antibodies: Anti-TRPV1 (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel; cat#ACC-030; dilution 1:200), anti-TRPV3 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; cat #ab231150; dilution 1:200), anti-TRPV4 (Abcam; cat #ab39260 dilution 1:200) or rabbit isotype IgG (Dako; Glostrup Denmark; Cat#X0903) as negative control. Diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma Fast kit, Sigma-Aldrich; Oakville ON Canada; cat#D4168) was used for the detection of the labeled proteins, and the sections were counterstained with Harris modified hematoxylin (Fisher Scientific, Cat#SH26−500D). Slides were scanned with a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0-RS scanner from the Histology and Electron Microscopy platform at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of the Université de Sherbrooke.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Kidneys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse kidneys were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for at least 24 hours and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections were deparaffinized and hydrated in graded ethanol series before staining with the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. Antigens were retrieved by boiling the sections for 20 min in 10 mM citric acid solution (pH = 6) or 10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA (pH = 9). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide. The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. The sections were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies. 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) was used as chromogen. Sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin and were dehydrated and coverslipped. Image acquisition was performed on the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0 RS scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Paraffin-Embedded Mouse Embryo Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse embryos at E16.5 were fixed in 4% PFA overnight, embedded in paraffin, and 5 μm sections were cut and mounted on slides. The sections were deparaffinized by xylene and stained by H&E solution. Nanozoomer 2.0 RS scanner (Hamamatsu) was used to image the slides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!