The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in United States, Austria

The 'rms' package is a tool for regression modeling strategies in the R statistical computing environment. It provides functions for creating and evaluating regression models, including logistic, ordinal, and other types of models. The package offers utilities for model validation, variable selection, and presentation of model results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using rms package

1

Prognostic Accuracy of Combined Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), Prism software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA), and R software version 3.2.5 with the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for CES and compare the prognostic accuracy for combination model. Pearson’s chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were applied for categorical variables; continuous variables were analyzed by the Student’s t test. Survival and univariate analysis were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the significance of the difference between curves was calculated with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform multivariate analysis. Nomogram was generated by R software with “rms” package. The prognostic accuracy was also measured by calculating the C-index and AIC. All statistical analyses were two-sided, and P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prognostic Impact of CXCR4 Expression in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analyses, CXCR4 staining was dichotomized into two groups (high (scores 0, 1, and 2) and low (scores 3 and 4)). We compared two groups using χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the t-test for continuous variables. Survival curves were established using the Kaplan–Meier method, and log-rank test was applied to compare the difference between the curves. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform univariate and multivariate analyses, and those parameters that demonstrated a statistically significant effect on OS in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. The sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of OS were analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to measure prognostic or predictive accuracy. Data were analysed using SPSS Statistics 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All statistical tests were two-sided and statistical significance was set at 0.05. We used the R software version 3.0.2 and the ‘rms' package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) to perform the nomogram analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical evaluation was performed using IBM SPSS statistics Version 22 (SPSS Inc; IBM Corporation Software Group, Somers, NY). The Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was utilized for exploratory comparisons of patient groups. All statistical tests were performed 2-sided, and P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. OS and DFS were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare independent subgroups. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the effect on survival of multivariable relationships among covariates including the age at diagnosis, gender, stage at diagnosis, histological type, histological grade and treatment. Stage, status of perineural, and vascular invasion or any known clinical characteristics supposed to affect the prognosis were the stratified variable. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for multivariate analyses were computed using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. The R software version 3.4.3 and the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were applied to perform the nomogram analysis and calibration plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was applied for categorical variables. Student’s t test was applied for the analysis of continuous variables. Survival curves were established on the basis of the Kaplan–Meier methodology and the significance of differences between survival curves was calculated by means of the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was constructed through the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Statistical analysis was performed with the help of SPSS Statistics 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The nomogram analysis and calibration plot were produced via the R software version 3.0.2 and the ‘rms’ package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Harrell’s index of concordance (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were both calculated in order to compare and validate the accuracy of the predictive models. All statistical tests were two sided and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determining Expression Subgroups and Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cut-off point for the definition of high/low expression subgroups was determined by X-tile plot analysis (20 (link)). SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform the analyses. The Pearson χ2 test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare categorical variables. Continuous variables were analyzed with an unpaired Student's t-test. Survival estimates were conducted with Kaplan-Meier curves, and statistical significance was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the independent prognosticator. A nomogram was generated by R software v3.2.2 with ‘rms’ package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Calibration plots for 3- and 5-year survival rates were constructed to examine the performance characteristics of the generated nomograms. The prognostic accuracy was measured by calculating the Harrell's concordance indices (c-indices). All statistical analyses were two-sided, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tetranectin Expression and Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and R software version 3.0.2 and the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform univariate and multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the survival and log-rank test was used to compare the patient survival between subgroups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) at different cut-off values of OS time was calculated to determine the optimal cut-off value of the tetranectin expression in tumors. Nomogram was created by R software using “rms” package. Calibration plots were generated to examine the performance characteristics of the predictive nomogram. The Harrell's concordance index (C-Index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to measure the prognostic accuracy. All statistical analyses were two-sided and P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical evaluation was performed using IBM SPSS statistics Version 22 (SPSS Inc; IBM Corporation Software Group, Somers, NY). The Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was utilized in exploratorily comparing baseline characteristics. For pairwise analysis in continuous variables, the correlation with blood leukocyte and tumor infiltration cells was calculated by spearman. OS and DFS were compared with the Kaplan-Meier plotter and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test to identify the independent survival beneficial subgroups. Uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival were conducted by cox proportional hazard models to investigate the effect on survival among covariates including the diagnostic age, sex, disease stage, histological type, differential grade and adjuvant treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for multivariate analyses were computed using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed to identify the performance of blood leukocytosis. The R software version 3.4.3 and the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were applied to perform the nomogram analysis and calibration plot. All statistical tests were performed 2-sided, and P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Prognostic Model for Cancer Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-tile plot analysis was conducted to select the optimum cutoff of the H-score to dichotomize the patients into low and high groups36 (link). Comparisons between SLC1A5 expression and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated using Student’s t test, χ2–test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. Survival curves were conducted by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models were exploited to evaluate the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of clinicopathologic variables. Nomogram was set to construct the prognostic model. Calibration plot was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the models. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to compare the sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of OS by the prognostic models. All statistical tests were two-tailed and differences were considered significant at level of <0.05. Data were analyzed using X-tile software v3.6.1 (Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA), IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York), MedCalc Software 11.4.2.0 (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium) and R software 3.0.2 with the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Predictive Nomogram for Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was performed with SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and R software version 3.0.2 and the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Pearson χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables, and continuous variables were analyzed by Student's t test. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform univariate and multivariate analyses and those variables that achieved statistical significance in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariable analysis. Furthermore, a nomogram was created by R software using “rms” package. Calibration plots were generated to examine the performance characteristics of the predictive nomogram. The Harrell's Concordance index (C-index) was used to quantify the predictive accuracy. All statistical tests were two-sided and performed at a significance level of 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Prognostic Factors Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MedCalc and Stata 12.0 were used for statistical analysis. Categorical data were analyzed using the Fisher exact or chi-square test. Numerical data were analyzed by the Student t-test. Subgroup OS curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test. We used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the HR and 95% CI. The accuracy of the prognostic factors were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index). Furthermore, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value was calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability of prognostic models, and smaller AIC values present a better predicting ability. We applied the R software and the “rms” package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) to perform the nomogram analysis and calibration plot. All statistical tests were two sided and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!