The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Synapt g2 qtof mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The Synapt G2 QTOF mass spectrometer is a high-performance analytical instrument designed for advanced mass spectrometry applications. It features a quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) configuration, which provides accurate mass measurements and high-resolution capabilities. The core function of the Synapt G2 QTOF is to perform sensitive and precise analysis of a wide range of molecular compounds, enabling researchers and analysts to identify and characterize complex samples with confidence.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using synapt g2 qtof mass spectrometer

1

Positive Ion Mode Electrospray MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All mass spectrometry experiments were collected on a Waters Synapt G2 Q-ToF mass spectrometer (Manchester, UK). The instrument was operated in positive ion mode electrospray with a capillary voltage of 2.0 kV and sampling cone voltage was 30 V. Nitrogen at a flow rate of 650 L/h was used as the desolvation gas with a constant desolvation temperature of 350 °C, a cone gas flow rate of 50 L/h, and a source temperature of 130 °C. Data were acquired over the m/z range 50–800. An integral LockSpray unit infusing Leucine-Enkephalin peptide into the electrospray sample stream was used to collect reference scans. Scans were performed every 10 s with the reference calibrant introduced at a flow rate of 10 µL/min using the fluidics system of the instrument. Single point lock-mass correction was used for the protonated pseudo-molecular ion at m/z 556.2771 (+ve). All data were acquired and analysed with Waters MassLynx v4.1 software (Manchester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Salicylic Acid Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample consisted of 10 (±1) mg freeze-dried, ground plant material of 4-week-old rosettes, with 8 biological replicates per genotype, of plants that had been grown in randomized complete block design at 23°C SD. SA was extracted twice with 400 μl 20% methanol (LCMS-grade) / 0.1% hydrofluoroalkane by 5 min ultrasonic extraction, followed by 20 min incubation on ice, and removal of solids by centrifugation for 10 min at 13,500 g. 320 μl supernatant were removed after each extraction step and combined in a new vial. A third extraction step with 400 μl of 100% methanol (conditions see above) was performed and the supernatant was combined with the previous ones. The total volume was split in half before drying in a speed vac. For analysis of the conjugated and free salicylic acid the pellets were redissolved in 30 μl 50% methanol / 0,1% formic acid. Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS) analysis was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled to a SYNAPT G2 QTOF mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI-Source (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) at the University of Tübingen—ZMBP Analytics Laboratory. MassLynx v4.1 was used to control the LCMS system and TargetLynx (Waters Corporation) to perform data integration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analytical Techniques for Natural Product Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HRESIMS data were obtained on a Waters Synapt G2 Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Optical rotations were measured on a Rudolph Research Analytical Autopol III polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, Hackettstown, NJ, USA). 1D and 2D NMR spectra were acquired using a Bruker 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany). IR spectra were measured on a JASCO FT/IR-4100 spectrophotometer (JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). UV-visible spectra were measured by a Shimadzu UV-1650PC spectrophotometer. HPLC was carried out with a PrimeLine Binary pump (Analytical Scientific Instruments, Inc., El Sobrante, CA, USA) and a RI-101 detector (Shoko Scientific Co. Ltd., Yokohama, Japan). Semi-preparative HPLC was conducted using an ODS column (YMC-Pack-ODS-A, 250 × 10 mm i.d, 5 μM). Analytical HPLC was performed with an ODS column (YMC-Pack-ODS-A, 250 × 4.6 mm i.d, 5 μM). All the used reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analytical Characterization of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All peptides were assessed for purity by analytical C18 RP-HP-LCMS prior to use in biological assays. Buffers used were 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water (A) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (B). The standard method (1) consisted of a linear gradient of 5% to 95% B over 10 minutes on Agilent 1100 series HPLC-MSD and method (2) consisted of a linear gradient of 5% to 95% B over 8 minutes on Waters 2767 series HPLC-MSD. The C18 column (Phenomenex, Luna C18, 4.6 × 150mm) effluent was immediately mass analyzed in electrospray positive mode. Accurate mass measurements of final peptides were performed using C18 reversed-phase chromatography mass spectrometry (RPHPLCMS) and mass detected on a Waters Synapt G2 Q-Tof mass spectrometer tuned to a resolution (FWHM) of 25,000. Exact intact masses were calculated based on the monoisotopic m/z value of the base peak charge state. All peptides were analyzed using these methods. Supporting data of peptide 45 is shown (Supplementary Figure S2) as representative data sets of the all the molecules investigated (characterization of all peptides presented on Table 1S).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Identification of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analyses were performed on tryptic peptides from SDS-PAGE gels
using a Synapt G2 QToF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA). Acquired spectra
were submitted to independent Mascot searches (Matrix Science, Boston, MA)
against a SwissProt database (Human taxonomy). Scoring
thresholds were set to a peptide false discovery rate of 0% using the
PeptideProphet algorithm [42 (link), 43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Spectroscopic Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1700 PharmaSpec UV-visible spectrophotometer. The 1H, 13C, and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were measured by a Bruker AVANCE-600 NMR spectrometer (Rheinstetten, Germany) with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. HRESIMS data were acquired using a Waters Synapt G2 QTOF mass spectrometer (Milford, CT, USA). ECD spectra were taken on a Biologic MOS-450. Optical rotations were measured using a JASCO VP-1020.
For column chromatography (CC), silica gel (100–200 and 200–300 mesh, Qingdao, China), Sephadex LH-20 (Uppsala, Sweden) and ODS (60–80 μm, Tokyo, Japan) was used. The analytical HPLC was obtained with an Agilent 1200 (CA, USA) with a DAD detector using a reversed-phase C18 column (5 μm, 250 × 4.60 mm). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a Shimadzu LC-6AD (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a UV SPD-20A detector using a reversed-phase C18 column (5 μm, 250 × 10 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phytochemical Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using a Waters Synapt G2 qTOF mass spectrometer. The Synapt G2 qTOF from Waters (Milford, USA) is a high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight (qTOF) mass spectrometer capable of data independent analysis (DIA) using Waters ms E technology. When linked to a Waters Acquity UPLC, the system can achieve good chromatographic separation between compounds followed by simultaneous acquisition of both fragmented and unfragmented mass spectra of all compounds within each peak eluting off the column, together with UV spectra produced by the photodiode array (PDA) detector placed upstream of the qTOF. The acetone extracts were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min before analysis. A waters HSS T3 column, 2.1 × 150 mm was used in obtaining the separation of the phytoconstituents. Two mobile phases (A) and (B) were used, where (A) consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water and (B) had acetonitrile 5 mM ammonium formate. A 5 μl volume of the extracts was injected into the analytical column for analysis. The sample flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/min. The MS spectra were acquired in the positive ion mode. The mass fragmentations were identified by using a spectrum database for organic compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural Characterization of Natural Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points were determined with a Tektronix X-4 micromelting-point apparatus (Beijing, China). The optical rotations were recorded on a JASCO P-1020 digital polarimeter (Kyoto, Japan), and the UV spectra were measured with a Shimadzu UV-2201 UV-Vis recording spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). The IR data (KBr disks) were measured by a Bruker IFS-55 spectrometer (Rheinstetten, Germany). The CD spectra were obtained using a Bio-Logic MOS-450 (Grenoble, France). The 1D and 2D NMR spectra were run on Bruker AVANCE-400 or AVANCE-600 NMR spectrometers (Rheinstetten, Germany). The HRESIMS data were obtained on a Waters Synapt G2 QTOF mass spectrometer (MA, USA). The analytical HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1200 (CA, USA) equipped with a DAD detector using an ODS column (5 μm, 250 × 4.60 mm; Phenomenex Luna, CA, USA). Semipreparative HPLC was performed using a Shimadzu LC-6AD (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a UV SPD-20A detector using an ODS column (5 μm, 250 × 10 mm, Phenomenex Luna, CA, USA). Column chromatography was carried out using silica gel (100–200 mesh and 200–300 mesh, Qingdao, China), ODS (60–80 μm, Tokyo, Japan), and Sephadex LH-20 (Uppsala, Sweden). Analytical grade solvents were used for the extraction and chromatographic separation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spectroscopic Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in DMSO-d6 on a Bruker Avance III HD 400 spectrometer at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, using TMS as internal standard. The chemical shift values (δ) are reported in ppm units, and the coupling constants (J) are in Hertz (Hz). UV spectra were recorded on a Jasco V-530 spectrophotometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). HRESIMS was performed on a Waters Synapt G2 QTOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). TLC analyses were carried out on precoated silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The developing system used was CHCl3:MeOH solution, and visualization of TLC plates was performed under UV light (254 and 365 nm) or performed with anisaldehyde-H2SO4 spray reagent. The adsorbent used for open column chromatography was silica gel 60–230 mesh. HPLC was performed on a Waters 1525 Binary HPLC pump (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) connected to a Waters 996 Photodiode Array detector using Zorbax RX-C18 (21.2 × 250 mm) and Waters Symmetry C18 (4.6 × 150 mm) columns with HPLC-grade methanol and water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of wt-MoaC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
wt-MoaC (5 μM) was incubated for 120 min at 25 °C in the presence or absence of 3′,8-cH2GMPcPP (10 μM). Subsequently, samples were buffer-exchanged in 150 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, over a 10 kDa MWCO filter. This buffer exchange resulted in a 4096-fold dilution of the small molecules in the protein fraction. Then, the samples were diluted to 10 μM in 20% acetonitrile/30 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, and directly infused through a fused-silica capillary at 4 μL/min into a Waters Synapt G2 QTOF mass spectrometer operating in positive ionization mode through an electrospray interface. Source temperature was set to 80 °C, and the N2 nebulizing gas was set to 4 L/min. Approximately 30 full MS scans from m/z 50 to 2000 were collected for each condition. Spectra were summed and then deconvoluted with the Waters MaxEnt1 algorithm. Horse myoglobin was infused immediately prior to the test samples, and a static mass correction (−1.5 Da) was applied to all test samples based on the net difference from the expected myoglobin mass.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!