The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Developer toolbox

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Developer Toolbox is a comprehensive suite of tools designed to assist developers in managing and maintaining their software projects. It provides a centralized platform for streamlining the development process, offering a range of features to enhance productivity and collaboration.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using developer toolbox

1

Cell Viability Evaluation of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of the tested compounds on cell viability, in the absence of viral infection, Vero CCL-81 cells were seeded 24 h prior to compound addition in 96-well imaging plates, at a density of 1 × 104 per well, and cultured overnight at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Five final concentrations (10.00 μM, 14.96 μM, 22.36 μM, 33.44 μM, and 50.00 μM) of each compound resuspended in DMEM containing 5% FBS were tested in the seeded cells (in duplicate), by replacing the culture medium. DMSO was used as control. After 48 h incubation with the compounds, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained for 30 min for nuclear markers, with DAPI (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and for cell delineation markers, with HCS CellMask (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). In the end, images of each well were acquired on the IN Cell Analyzer 2000, using a 10× magnifying objective. Image analysis was performed by using image segmentation and the quantification software “Developer Toolbox” (version 1.9.3, x64, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and CellProfiler [35 (link)]. DAPI was used to assess the number of cells. Three independent experiments were performed. Data were presented as percent compared with control wells (“blank”, non-infected cells without the presence of the compounds). The IC50 values in the absence of infection were calculated with Prism 9 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunocytochemistry Staining and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry was performed as described previously [56 (link),57 (link)]. The primary and secondary antibodies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Image analysis was performed using In Cell analyzer 2000 and Developer Toolbox software (GE Healthcare UK Ltd., Little Chalfont, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Worm Fluorescence Signals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure total green fluorescence signal per worm, a young adult-stage population was washed from the plate and transferred to clear, flat bottom, 96-well plate. Worms were paralyzed with 10 mM levamisole (L9756, SIGMA-ALDRICH). Plates were sealed with a seal plate adhesive (SealMate System, Excel Scientific) and imaged in the automated microscope IN Cell Analyzer 2000 (GE Healthcare Life Science) using an objective Plan Apo 2X/0.1. Total GFP intensity was calculated with the Developer Toolbox (GE Healthcare Life Science) integrated software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Nanog-GFP Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed cells were imaged using an IN Cell Analyzer 2000 automated microscopy system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Image stacks were imported into the Developer Toolbox (GE Healthcare) software for the quantification of GFP expression. The activity of compounds was calculated using the following equation: [Nanog-GFP expression % = (A -B)/(C -B) × 100], where A is the GFP expression of test compound-treated cells, B is the GFP expression of DMSO-treated cells, and C is the GFP expression of 2i/LIF-treated cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!