The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xeleris 4

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

Xeleris 4.0 is a nuclear medicine imaging workstation developed by GE Healthcare. It is designed to process and analyze data from various nuclear imaging modalities, including SPECT, PET, and planar imaging. The system provides tools for image reconstruction, quantification, and visualization to aid in clinical diagnosis and treatment planning.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using xeleris 4

1

Quantitative Bone Scintigraphy in MOWHTO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone scintigraphy was conducted before MOWHTO and at the time of the plate removal. The delayed image was obtained 3 to 4 hours after the injection of 925 MBq 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) using a dual-head gamma camera (Discovery NM 630, GE, USA) equipped with a low-energy high-resolution collimator. The spot images centered on the knee were subsequently acquired in a 256 x 256 matrix up to 300,000 counts. The tracer count measurement within the ROIs was analyzed by the vendor-provided software (Xeleris 4.0, GE, USA). For reference measurement, a standard region of interest (ROI) with a diameter of 2 cm was positioned centrally in the distal femur 10 cm above the joint space [21 (link)]. BTU was calculated by dividing maximal tracer uptake in the ROI of each region by the average tracer uptake in the reference ROI for quantification [15 (link)]. Routine analysis of bone scintigraphy were evaluated in the department of nuclear medicine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative SPECT Imaging Device Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the NM/CT 870 CZT device equipped with a whole‐body CZT detector (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA; Fig. 1), and the E.CAM device equipped with an NaI scintillation detector (Canon Medical Systems Tokyo, Japan). WEHR (C‐SPECT_WEHR) and MEHRS (C‐SPECT_MEHRS) were used as collimators for the C‐SPECT device. A low‐energy high‐resolution (LEHR) collimator (A‐SPECT_LEHR) for 99mTc and a low‐medium‐energy general purpose (LMEGP) collimator (A‐SPECT_LMEGP) for 123I were used on the A‐SPECT device, while keeping clinical practice in mind. The design parameters of the WEHR, MEHRS, LEHR, and LMEGP collimators are shown in Table 1. Although the parameters of LMEGP were not disclosed, the system spatial resolution and sensitivity were LEHR × 0.70 and LEHR × 1.71 at the manufacturing stage respectively. Xeleris 4.0 (GE Healthcare) and E‐Soft (Canon Medical Systems) were used as image‐processing devices. For image analysis, we used the general image‐processing software Prominence Processor Version 3.112 (Nihon Medi‐Physics Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA), and Demon Research Image Processor Version 3.01 (FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Radionuclide, 99mTc‐incardronate (Nihon Medi‐Physics Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and 123I‐IMP perfuzamine (Nihon Medi‐Physics Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Salivary Scintigraphy Phantom Rotation Bias

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The planar projections and data processing were performed by an experienced operator using a nuclear medicine workstation (Xeleris™ 4.0, GE Healthcare). Regions of interest (ROIs) around the salivary gland simulators were defined in both the anterior and posterior images (Fig. 3A and B), and the counts within these regions were recorded by parallel detectors for the different rotational angles of the phantom. The anterior planar acquisition without phantom rotation collected ~67 000 total counts for the parotid gland simulators and ~41 000 total counts for the submandibular gland simulators, which are close to those acquired in the clinical scenario. All datasets were corrected for isotope decay and normalized to standard activity counts (no phantom rotation) in each ROI. The percentage absolute difference between rotational and standard planar normalized counts was considered to represent the bias related to the phantom rotation in the acquisition methods of salivary scintigraphy and was calculated using equation (1)1.
We then compared the bias using the following two data processing methods: (i) only using the anterior planar counts method and (ii) using the GM of both the anterior and posterior planar counts method, which are hereafter called the ANT method and GM method, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cardiac SPECT/CT Imaging with CZT Detectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scintigraphy examination was performed using CZT SPECT/CT (GE Discovery 570C, GE Healthcare, Haifa, Israel) with low-energy multi-pinhole collimators and 19 stationary detectors [30 (link)]. Each detector contained 32 × 32 pixelated (2.46 × 2.46 mm) CZT elements. The energy window was symmetrically centered to ± 20% of the 140 keV Tc-99m photopeak. The images were reconstructed on the dedicated workstation (Xeleris 4.0; GE Healthcare, Haifa, Israel).
The time interval between MPI and gBPS examinations ranged from 1 to 2 days. MPI was performed first in all patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative 18F-NaF PET/CT Assessment of Osteoblastic Activity in Chondroid Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were evaluated by an experienced nuclear medicine physician blinded to histologic result. The presence of hyperemia was visually evaluated based on blood pool image. On the whole-body image, the degree of radionuclide uptake in the lesion was compared with that in anterior iliac crest. If radionuclide uptake in the lesion was equal to or higher than that of the anterior iliac crest, the case was regarded to have high osteoblastic activity.
All SPECT/CT images were closely evaluated on a dedicated workstation (Xeleris 4.0, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) that displayed CT, SPECT, and fused SPECT/CT images. For quantitative analysis, the regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn over the chondroid tumors on each slice of SPECT/CT by an experienced nuclear medicine physician who reviewed magnetic resonance images. Then, the final volumes of interest (VOIs) were generated by integrating multiple ROIs. Quantitative parameters were obtained from VOIs using the Q.Metrix toolkit installed on the dedicated workstation. SUVmean and SUVmax in a given VOI were calculated as follows: SUVmean=totalradioactivity/VOIvolume/injectedradioactivity/bodyweightg/mlSUVmax=maximumradioactivity/voxelvolume/injectedradioactivity/bodyweightg/ml In addition, the longest diameter of each tumor was measured on MRI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!