The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gc ms postrun analysis

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The GC-MS Postrun Analysis is a software tool provided by Shimadzu for the analysis of data collected from gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) instruments. The software allows users to review, process, and interpret the data generated during GC-MS analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using gc ms postrun analysis

1

GC-MS Profiling of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The profile of the essential oils investigated was assessed using the GC-MS technique according to the protocol [78 (link)]. Identification of all volatile constituents was based on comparison of experimentally obtained compound’s mass spectra with mass spectra available in the NIST20 database. Additionally, the retention indices (RI) obtained experimentally, calculated using macro [79 (link)], were compared with the RI available in the NIST20 database and the data from the literature [80 ]. Shimadzu software GCMS Postrun Analysis (Shimadzu Company, Kyoto, Japan) and ACD/Spectrus Processor (Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) were used to process the data. The quantification of identified constituents was performed by calculation based on the amount of added internal standard and expressed as a percentage of integrated peaks’ area. Analysis was performed using the Shimadzu 2020 apparatus (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA) equipped with a Zebron ZB-5 MSI (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The temperature of the GC oven was programmed from 50 °C to 250 °C at a rate of 3.0 °C and kept for 3 min. Scanning was performed from 35 to 550 m/z in electronic impact (EI) at 70 eV and ion source temperature 250 °C. Samples were injected at split ratio 1:10 and gas helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Untargeted Metabolomics Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw LC-MS data were converted tomzXML format using MSconvert tools (Version 3,64 bit, proteowizard, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Raw GC-MS data were converted to mzXML format using GC-MS Postrun analysis (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Preprocessing of MS data including peak picking, peak grouping, retention time (RT) correction, and integration was performed using the XCMS implemented with R software (Version 3.5, University of Auckland, New Zealand). Each ion was identified by the RT and m/z data. Intensities of each peak were recorded and a three-dimensional matrix containing arbitrarily assigned peak indices and ion intensity information was generated. The intensities of each ions identified were normalized and the quantitative data were analyzed by several unsupervised methods and supervised methods in R. PCA (principle components analysis) was used for multivariate exploration of clusters and trends among the observation. Feature selection were performed by Boruta package in R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolite Identification and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolites were identified using an automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system (AMDIS, NIST, USA) for spectral peak deconvolution and the National Institute of Standards and Technologies Mass Spectral library. A quantitative table containing the characteristic ions and the retention times of metabolites was imported to GC–MS Post run Analysis (Shimadzu, Japan) for batch processing of all samples. Identified metabolites with relative standard deviations < 10% in QC samples were used for further analyses. Multivariate analysis was conducted in SIMCA-P 11.5 (Umetrics, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomic Profiling of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC-MS data were converted from Shimadzu GC-MS Postrun Analysis to netCDF format file and processed with XCMS web software (https://xcmsonline.scripps.edu). Intensities of features in the data set processed in XCMS were normalized by an internal standard (methyl stearate). PCA and PLS-DA of GC-MS data were performed to visualize the variance of metabolites using SIMCA-P 15.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). Cross validation was performed using a permutation test that was repeated 200 times. Metabolites with VIP > 1.0 and p < 0.05 were considered as metabolites that could discriminate groups. Identification of metabolites was performed by comparing their mass spectra with NIST 14.0. Metabolic pathway analysis (MetPA) was conducted to determine the influence of metabolic pathways on potential marker metabolites using MetaboAnalyst (www.metaboanalyst.ca).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated LC-MS and GC-MS Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data of LC-MS were automatically peak-detected, sorted, and integrated by PeakView software (AB, SCIEX) to perform manual peak area integration on characteristic ions of known metabolites. The peak table was then exported to Excel Software for further analysis. With regard to GC-MS, a peak table was obtained using GC-MS postrun analysis (Shimadzu, Japan) based on a quantitative table. The mass spectrometry response of LC/GC-MS is corrected by using a virtual QC sample, which is described in a previous study [15 (link), 17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Profiling of Plant Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolites from the sampled shoots and roots of both genotypes of each replication under the different treatments were extracted and measured based on their chromatograms and mass spectra using the GC-MS Postrun Analysis (Shimadzu) software as described previously (Zhao et al. 2013 (link)). Specific mass spectral fragments were detected in defined retention-time windows using the mass spectral libraries of NIST08, NIST08S, and Wiley 9 in the public domain mass spectra library of the Max Planck Institute in Germany (http://csbdb.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/csbdb/). The quantification of each metabolite was based on its specific peak area. Further confirmation of most identified amino acids, organic acids, and sugars was performed by standard addition experiments using the pure authenticated compounds. In total, 88 primary metabolites were identified in the present study (Supplementary Table S2 at JXB online).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

GC-MS Data Processing and Multivariate Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw data were converted to .mzXML format in GC–MS Postrun Analysis (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) before being processed by freely available “XCMS” package in R. The output table encompassing time-aligned features (retention time—mass to charge ratio pair), feature intensity and sample names were ready for normalization in R.
The normalized urine data were evaluated in SIMCA version 14 (MKS Umetrics AB, Sweden) for multivariate analysis. Before being subjected to orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) with corresponding S-plot analysis (feature selection criteria p[1] > 0.2, p(corr) > 0.6 and p[1] < − 0.1, p(corr) < − 0.8), data were logarithmically transformed (base10) and Pareto-scaled. Semi-quantification was performed by peak area of feature divided by peak area of internal standard and the data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.). All the statistic tests were performed in SPSS (IBM SPSS statistics, version 22). Graphs were prepared in SIMCA 14 and R (version 3.4.2) with package “ggplot2”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GC-MS Metabolite Profiling Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected data were converted into MZ data by GC-MS Postrun Analysis (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The data of all batches of raw and processed MF samples were introduced to R 2.7.2 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) to obtain a three-dimensional matrix including retention time (Rt), mass/charge ratio (m/z), and peak intensities. The data obtained was imported into SIMCA-P 14.1 statistical software (Umetrics AB, Umea, Sweden) for multivariate statistical analysis to screen differential markers. The selected differential components’ accuracy was calculated by the BP-NN algorithm using Matlab R2014a (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GC-MS Analysis of E. coli Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. coli excretion profiles were determined by analyzing spent media with gas chromotography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS). E. coli were grown to saturation in lactose minimal media supplemented with methionine, and then the cells were filtered out with a 0.2-µm filter. Three milliliters of spent media were acidified with 100 μL of 4% HCl, and 3 μL of 10% U-13C glucose were added as an internal standard. Media were passed through solid phase extraction Chromaband C18 columns per manufacturer directions (Macherey-Nagel) and eluted in 500 μL methanol. After removal of methanol in a vacuum centrifuge, samples were resuspended in 50 μL methoxamine (MOX) reagent and incubated for 3 h at 85 °C. Then, 50 μL of N-(tertbutyldimethylsilyl) –N-methyltrifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) were added, and the sample was incubated for an additional hour. Derivatized samples were injected into a Shimadzu QP2010 GC-MS. The injection source was 230 °C. The oven was held at 80 °C for 3 min, increased to 280 °C at a rate of 5 °C per minute, and held at 280 °C for 2 min. Column flow rate was 1 mL/min, and the split ratio was 0. The column was a 30-m DB column (Restek). Results were analyzed in GC-MS Postrun Analysis (Version 2.70; Shimadzu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification and Quantification of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of both volatile compounds and EOs constituents was based upon a comparison of experimentally obtained mass spectra and Kovats retention indices (RI) with those available in NIST WebBook, NIST14 database and literature data [35 ]. The data was processed using Shimadzu software GCMS Postrun Analysis (Shimadzu Company, Kyoto, Japan) and ACD/Spectrus Processor (Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada). The quantification of identified constituents was performed by calculation based on the amount of added internal standard (2.0 mg of 2-undecanone) and the percentages of particular peaks area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!