The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using med020

1

Morphological Analysis of Phage CUB19 by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of CUB19 was detected by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Zeiss EM 906 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Deutschland GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) and negative staining as in a previous study [14 (link)]. Shortly, 15 µL of phage solution was dropped onto Parafilm and transferred onto a carbon-coated and glow discharged (Leica MED 020, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) Ni-mesh grid (G2430N; Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and left to adsorb for 10–15 min at room temperature. After washing the grids three times with Aquadest, they were treated with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) for 20 s for negative staining. Grids were air dried and then imaged by TEM at a voltage of 80 kV. Phage size was measured using the image processing program ImageJ.JS 1.53 m [15 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phage Morphology Characterization by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The virion morphology characteristics were visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using the negative staining technique. A volume of 15 µL of phage solution was dropped onto parafilm prior transferal onto a Ni-mesh grid (G2430N; Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) that has previously been carbon-coated and glow discharged (Leica MED 020, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The grid is then let to adsorb for 10–15 min at room temperature and then washed three times with Aquadest and treated with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) for 20 s for negative staining. Afterwards, excess staining was removed with filter paper. Grids were air dried and then imaged by TEM using a Zeiss EM 906 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Deutschland, Oberkochen, Germany) at a voltage of 80 kV. The image processing program ImageJ [27 ] was used for phage size measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transmission Electron Microscopy of CUB-EPI_14

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of CUB-EPI_14 was detected by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using negative staining. Ten randomly selected viral particles were evaluated for size calculation. An aliquot of 15 µL of the high-titer phage particle preparation was dropped onto parafilm before the transferal onto a Ni-mesh grid (G2430N; Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), which has been carbon-coated and glow discharged (Leica MED 020, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and allowed to adsorb for 10–15 min at room temperature. The grids were washed three times with Aquadest and subsequently treated with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) for 20 s for negative staining, followed by the removal of excess staining with filter paper. Grids were air-dried and then imaged by TEM using a Zeiss EM 906 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Deutschland; Oberkochen, Germany) at a voltage of 80 kV. Phage size measurements were calculated using the image processing software ImageJ.JS 1.53 m (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, accessed on 2 May 2022) [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Imaging of Photonic Chips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After chip-TIRFM imaging, both the coverslip and the PDMS frame were removed and the samples were fixed with 0.1% glutaraldehyde. Thereafter, the samples were incubated with methylcellulose followed by centrifugation at 4700 rpm (Heraeus Megafuge 40 R, Thermo Scientific) in a falcon tube. After drying (2 × 10 min) at 40 °C on a heating plate, the photonic chips were transferred to an electron beam evaporator (MED 020, Leica Microsystems). The specimen was then coated with platinum/carbon (Pt/C, 10 nm) by rotary shadowing at an angle of 8°57 (link). Thereafter, the photonic chips were mounted on a 25 mm Pin Mount SEMclip (#16144-9-30, Ted Pella) and imaged at 4 nm pixel size with a scanning electron microscope (Auriga 40 CrossBeam, Carl Zeiss Microscopy) at a low-accelerating voltage (1.5 keV). Supplementary Information S14 illustrates various steps of SEM imaging on a photonic chip.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEM Imaging of Intracellular Calcification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HGFs were cultured on 10 mm tissue culture plastic coverslips (Sarstedt, Newton, NC, USA) in 24-well plates for four weeks, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (EM grade, Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS), Hatfield, PA, USA), postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (EMS) and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol followed by critical point drying (Samdri-795; Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA). The coverslips were mounted on stubs and coated with 20-nm carbon (Med020, Leica Microsystems Inc, Concord, ON, Canada). Cells were visualized by SEM (Helios 650 Nanolab dual beam, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) using the backscattered electrons (BSE) imaging mode (atomic number contrast) and electron energy sectioning73 (link). Once a suitable area was identified, a cross section was created with the Focused Ion Beam (FIB), exposing the interior of the cells. The BSE imaging mode was used to distinguish the cell and intracellular calcified vesicles based on atomic number contrast. To confirm the presence of Ca (L alpha of 3.9 keV) and P (K alpha 2.013) areas of high density were analyzed using EDX point analysis (Octane Pro Detector, EDAX, Mahwah, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEM Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Once LM imaging was performed the wafers were “lifted” up by application of buffer solution close to the edges of the wafer. After few washes in PBS (3 × 10 min) the wafers were quickly washed with 2% methylcellulose (Sigma-Aldrich) (2 × 5 sec) and left in a drop of methylcellulose at 4 °C for 1–2 min. The wafer was then placed, as fast as possible, in an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 14100 × g for 90 sec, mounted on a SEM aluminum stub (Agar Scientific) using an adhesive carbon pad, left drying at room temperature for 5 min and transferred to an electron beam evaporator (MED 020, Leica Microsystems). The specimen was then coated with Platinum/carbon (Pt/C, 2 nm) by unidirectional or rotary shadowing at an angle of 8 degrees (Supplementary Fig. 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Analysis of PCL/Collagen Fiber Mats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The overview of prepared PCL/collagen fiber mats was visualized under the Micromaster™ inverted digital microscopes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA). The fiber diameter, morphology and pore size were further characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Upon sputter coating with Au/Pd alloy (MED020, Leica Microsystems), the fiber mats were examined using the Auriga FIB-SEM (Zeiss, Peabody, MA). Images from 5 randomly selected areas were captured and used for further analyses of fiber diameter and pore size using ImageJ1.49 (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preparing Photonic Chips for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After chip-TIRFM imaging, both the coverslip and the PDMS frame were removed and the samples xed with 0.1% glutaraldehyde. Thereafter, the samples were incubated with methylcellulose followed by centrifugation at 4700 rpm (Heraeus Megafuge 40R, Thermo Scienti c) in a falcon tube. After drying (2 × 10 min) at 40 °C on a heating plate, the photonic chips were transferred to an electron beam evaporator (MED 020, Leica Microsystems). The specimen was then coated with platinum/carbon (Pt/C, 10 nm) by rotary shadowing at an angle of 8 degrees [48] . Thereafter, the photonic chips were mounted on a 25 mm Pin Mount SEMclip (#16144-9-30, Ted Pella) and imaged at 4 nm pixel size with a scanning electron microscope (Auriga 40 CrossBeam, Carl Zeiss Microscopy) at a low-accelerating voltage (1.5 keV). Supplementary Information S12 illustrates various steps of SEM imaging on a photonic chip.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Resorbed Bone Surface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Osteoclasts plated on bone slices for 3 days were unroofed as described above and fixed for 10 min in a 0.2 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences 15710) and 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences 16220), then washed with distilled water. The samples were then prepared for observation following the protocol: they were dehydrated through a graded series (25–100%) of ethanol, transferred in acetone and subjected to critical point drying with CO2 in a Leica EM CPD300, then sputter-coated with 3 nm platinum with a Leica EM MED020 evaporator, and were examined and photographed with an FEI Quanta FEG250.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amorphous Carbon Film Deposition and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We evaporated amorphous carbon (from rods originally supplied by Fullam
or Bal-Tec, and now supplied by Ladd Research Industries, Burlington, VT, USA),
and used either a Denton Desktop Turbo vacuum evaporator (Denton Vacuum,
Mooreestown, NJ, USA) or a Bal-Tec (Leica) MED 020 evaporator, both with
oil-free pumping systems. In the Denton, we used resistance heating, and
estimated the film thickness by color. In the Bal-Tec, we used electron beam
evaporation and measured the thickness by a crystal-thickness monitor. The film
thickness was about 12 nm. The films, deposited on freshly cleaved mica, were
floated off on distilled water and picked up on 2-mm-diameter discs that had a 5
× 5 array of 100-μm-diameter apertures (a gift
from Kazuyoshi Murata, Okazaki, Japan, but available from Daiwa Techno Systems,
Tokyo, Japan). We call these 25 holes the “PP apertures,” and
during an imaging session, we think of each aperture as a different HFPP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!