The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Glass insert

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

Glass inserts are designed to fit inside analytical instrument sample vials or injection ports. They provide a secure and inert container for holding liquid or solid samples during analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using glass insert

1

Derivatization for GC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to GC-MS analysis, the dry residues were derivatized in two steps. For the methoximation step, the dried aqueous phase samples were suspended in 10μL of 30mg/mL O-methoxylamine hydrochloride dissolved in pyridine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After vortexing for 5 minutes, the samples were then incubated on an Eppendorf Thermomixer at 30°C, 1000 rpm for 90 minutes. In the silylation step, 90 µL of N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS, Thermo-Pierce cat. no.TS-48915) was added to each sample. After incubation for 30 minutes at 37°C and 1000 rpm (Eppendorf Thermomixer), the derivatized samples were then transferred into 250μL glass inserts (Agilent) for GC-MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Precipitation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein precipitation, 50 µL of the internal standard piperacillin-d5 (75 mg/L) and 700 µL deproteinization solution (10 mg/L dicloxacillin in methanol) were added to 50 µL of calibration standard, quality control, or plasma samples. Samples were vortexed for 1 minute, and the tubes were then centrifuged at 16,000g for 5 minutes at room temperature. Approximately 200 µL of the supernatant was transferred to 2-mL screw-top glass vial with 250 µL glass inserts and silicon septa caps (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and 5 µL was injected for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparation and Analysis of Passive Samplers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Passive samplers were prepared by coating swabs in a 40 mg mL−1 (PPPO, PPPO-GR, PPO and 1,3-DPB) or 4% (w/v) (TEA and PDMS) solution in dichloromethane and allowed to air dry. The optimised passive sampler was composed of a Nomex substrate coated in a PPPO film and these were used for all subsequent recovery and application studies in Parts A and B of this work. Prior to exposure, samplers were washed twice in methanol to remove contaminants. Following exposure, samplers for either LC-UV or LC-HRMS analysis, were placed in a screw capped, septum lined glass vial (7 mL) and extracted in 0.5 mL methanol. Aliquots of these extracts were placed into 250 µL glass inserts (Agilent, UK) within LC vials, and were crimp-capped and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Derivatization for GC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were derivatized for GC-MS analysis according to the method of Kind et al. [16 (link)]. Briefly, 10 µL of methoxyamine hydrochloride dissolved in pyridine (40 mg/mL) was added to each lyophilized sample, and shaken at 30 °C at maximum speed for 90 min using a thermomixer (Eppendorf). A mixture of retention time marker standards were prepared by dissolving fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) of different linear chain lengths in chloroform. The FAME mixture (20 µL) was added to 1 mL of N-methyl-N-trimethylsilytrifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS), and 90 µL of the FAMEs/MSTFA solution was added to each sample. Samples were shaken at 37 °C at maximum speed in a thermomixer for 30 min, and then transferred to and sealed in amber GC-MS sample vials containing glass inserts (Agilent). Extraction blanks were prepared following the above procedure but starting with empty Eppendorf tubes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasma Metabolites Extraction for LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma metabolites’ extraction was made on the basis of a previously described methodology [23 (link)]. In brief, 10 µL of plasma was mixed with 30 µL of cold methanol containing 1 μg/mL of Phe-13C as the internal standard and 1 μM BHT as the antioxidant. After incubation at 4 °C for 60 min, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 3 min. Then, the supernatant was filtrated (CLS8169, Sigma, Madrid, Spain) and transferred to vials with glass inserts (Agilent, Barcelona, Spain) for chemical analysis. Samples were decoded and randomized before the LC-MS analysis. To serve as quality control for metabolite extraction, a pool of plasma samples with internal Phe-13C was used and injected every 5 samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Lipidomics of Skin Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MULTI-BEADS SHOCKER MB1200 (YASUI KIKAI, Osaka, Japan) was used for pulverizing frozen ears. Crushed tissue was dissolved in 1 ml methanol and 500 μl chloroform containing the deuterium-labeled ceramide (1 μM d9-ceramides containing ester-linked FA, ω-hydroxy FA, and sphingosine (Cer[EOS]) d18:1/32:0/18:2; Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), followed by incubation at −30°C for 16 h. Samples were centrifuged (2,000 g, 4°C, 10 min), and 200 μl supernatants were dissolved in 100 μl methanol and 20 μl MilliQ water. After incubation (15 min, 20°C), the samples were centrifuged (2,000 g, 20°C, 10 min). The supernatants were applied for untargeted lipidomics.
The frozen epidermis and dermis were dissolved in 50 μl MilliQ water, 50 μl chloroform, and 100 μl methanol. Tissues were then dispersed using scissors. The total samples were mixed with 50 μl chloroform in an internal standard (300 nM d7-DHS d18:0, d7-Sph d18:1, d3-Cer[NS] d18:1/18:0, and d3-Cer[NDS] d18:0/18:0; Cayman). MilliQ water (50 μl) was added and vortexed. After centrifugation (10,000 g, 20°C, 1 min), the total volume of the precipitate was transferred to a glass insert (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a 2 ml vial. After drying, the dried samples were dissolved in 200 μl methanol. The samples (10 μl) were diluted with 190 μl of methanol and subjected to targeted lipidomics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification of Biological Extracts for UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and dried using a rotational vacuum concentrator for hormone extraction. The dried extract was reconstituted in 1 mL of 1% AcOH and further purified with a Sep-Pak tC18 cartridge (Waters, United States). The tC18 cartridge was washed by 1 mL methanol, which was followed by an equilibration step with 1 mL 1% AcOH. The sample was loaded into the cartridge, and this was followed with a wash of 1 mL 1% AcOH. The extract was eluted with 1 mL 80% ACN containing 1% AcOH into a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. The eluted extract was dried using a rotational vacuum concentrator and reconstituted in 20 μL 1% AcOH. The extract was vortexed for 30 s until the dried extract dissolved and then was centrifuged at 15,900 rcf at 4°C for 10 min. Samples were transferred to vials with a glass insert (Agilent, United States) and stored at −80°C until UPLC-MS/MS analysis (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Proteomics of Glycosidases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty-five micrograms of purified GLA, GBA, and
AGA was dissolved
in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (AmBic) buffer (pH 7.4) and further
reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) at 60 °C for 45 min on
a shaker, followed by alkylation with 20 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) at
25 °C for 30 min in the darkness. The sample was proteolytically
digested with chymotrypsin (1:40 enzyme/substrate ratio). The reaction
was quenched with 1 μL of TFA and the digested sample was desalted
by custom-made modified StageTip columns with three layers of C18
and two layers of C8 membrane (3 M Empore disks, Sigma-Aldrich). Samples
were eluted with two steps of 50 μL of 50% methanol in 0.1%
formic acid. The final sample was aliquoted in two equal parts. The
first aliquot was placed into a glass insert (Agilent, USA), dried
completely in a SpeedVac (Eppendorf, Germany), further redissolved
in 50 μL of 0.1% formic acid (FA), and submitted for nLC-MS
analysis. The second aliquot was placed in an Eppendorf tube, dried
completely in a SpeedVac, and redissolved in 50 μL of 50 mM
AmBic buffer (pH 7.4), followed by addition of 1 U PNGase F per sample
at 37 °C for 12 h on a shaker. The sample treated with PNGase
F was desalted, dried by the same methods mentioned above for the
first aliquot, and submitted for nLC-MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Polar Metabolite Extraction from Plant Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For polar metabolites analysis, a variation of the method described in Cheong et al. [70 (link)] was used. 250 µL 100% LC-MS grade MeOH (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), containing 4% 13C6 sorbitol/valine (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, Australia) was added to approximately 25 mg of frozen root tissue from each pooled group. Tubes were shaken at 800 rpm for 15 min at 30 °C, centrifuged at 15,700× g for 15 min at room temperature and the supernatant collected. The pellet was re-extracted with 250 µL of Milli-Q H2O as above and the supernatants combined. In case of cloudy supernatant or precipitate observed during supernatant transfer, the pooled supernatant was centrifuged at 15,700× g for 10 min at room temperature before transferring as much supernatant as possible to a new tube. From each sample, 50 µL aliquots of the supernatant were transferred into glass insert (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and dried under vacuum at 30 °C for 90 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!