The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microas autosampler

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The MicroAS autosampler is a compact and versatile sample introduction system designed for use with analytical instruments. It features automated sample handling capabilities to improve the efficiency and reproducibility of analytical workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using microas autosampler

1

Purification and MS Analysis of PTP-PEST

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble GST-tagged recombinant PTP-PEST proteins from bacterial lysates were fractionated using glutathione-Agarose prior to mixing with detergent-soluble cell lysates as described previously (23 (link)). Glutathione-bound fractions were resolved on an SDS polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions. Control and experimental bands were cut from the gel, and subjected to in-gel digestion with trypsin. Peptides were extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Peptides were resuspended in 2.5% formic acid (FA), 2.5% acetonitrile (MeCN) and were loaded using a Micro AS autosampler (Thermo Electron) onto a microcapillary column of 100 μm inner diameter packed with 12 cm of reversed-phase Magic C18 packing material (5 μm, 200 Å; Michrom Bioresources, Inc., Auburn, CA, USA). SEQUEST matches were filtered by XCorr scores to a less than 1% false discovery rate when the control proteins were eliminated and protein matches were required to have three spectral matches, no identifiable false positive peptides remained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Insect Protein Extraction and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Half of the last four segments of each insect abdomen were isolated using a razor blade and scissors which were cleaned after each sample with a 50% bleach solution. The insect tissue was mixed with 800 to 1200 μL of denaturing buffer (5% blue bromophenol, 150 mM Tris pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 7.8% glycerol) depending on the amount of tissue, vortexed for 20 seconds, and heated at 95° C for five minutes. The proteins were then separated via SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. Hemoglobin (approximately 16 kDa) was excised from the gel for trypsin digestion, as previously described [13 (link)] The LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out as previously described [13 (link)], and employed a LTQ (linear trap quadrupole)-Orbitrap Discovery with a Finnigan Surveyor Pump Plus and Micro AS autosampler (Thermo Electron; San Jose, CA, USA) controlled with Xcalibur™ 2.1 Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.; Waltham, MA, USA). Precursor ion spectra were obtained in the orbitrap, and fragment ion spectra were obtained in the linear ion trap.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phosphorylated Yeast Peptide Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analyses were set up and conducted as described previously (Doubleday and Ballif, 2014 (link)) using a MicroAs autosampler, a Surveyor PumpPlus HPLC and a linear ion trap-orbitrap (LTQ-Orbitrap) platform (Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA, USA). To identify tyrosine phosphorylated peptides, we performed a SEQUEST search of the MS/MS data using yeast proteome downloaded from SGD database (Jan. 2011). The search parameters required a precursor mass tolerance of 10 PPM, required peptides to be tryptic, and allowed dynamic modification of methionine (+15.99491 Da for oxidation), cysteine (+57.02146 Da for carbamidomethylation) and serines, threonines and tyrosines (+79.9663 Da for phosphorylation). By using the Ascore algorithm, we could determine the precise position of the phosphorylated residue with a confidence above 95% for 1433 pY sites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNase U2 Mutant Digestion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digestion products of the RNase U2 mutant or codon-optimized control were separated on a Waters Xbridge C18 column (3.5 μm, 1.0 × 150 mm) with MPA and mobile phase B (MPB: 50% MPA and 50% methanol) at a flow rate of 30 μL/min. The gradient started from 5% to 40% MPB in 5 min, followed by an increase until 95% MPB in 30 min. Samples were injected using a Thermo Finnigan micro AS autosampler and all separations were done through a Thermo Finnigan Surveyor MS Pump. A Thermo LTQ-XL mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization source was used. Mass spectra were acquired in negative polarity. The capillary temperature was set at 275 °C while the spray voltage was set at 4 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phosphopeptide Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated (flow-through) peptides were resuspended in 4% formic acid, 5% acetonitrile and analyzed by LC-MS/MS in technical duplicate on a system consisting of a MicroAS autosampler (Thermo Scientific), binary HPLC pumps (Agilent 1200 series) with flow-splitting, an in-house built nanospray source, and an LTQ Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Scientific). 2 µg of sample was loaded onto a 100 µm ID fused silica capillary packed with 18 cm of 5 µm Magic C18AQ resin (Michrome Bioresources). Peptides were eluted using a gradient of water:acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid from 7% to 25% acetonitrile over 120 min, and then 25–40% B over 30 minutes. A top 10 method was run consisting of one MS1 scan (resolution: 6×104 AGC: 5×105, maximum ion time: 500 ms) followed by ten data dependent MS2 scans (AGC: 1×10, maximum ion time: 100 ms) of the most abundant ions. Dependent scans were configured with the following settings: 2.0 m/z isolation width, dynamic exclusion width: −0.52, 2.02, exclusion duration: 60 seconds, normalized collision energy: 35, activation time: 5 ms. Charge state screening was employed to reject ions with unassigned or +1 charge states.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimized LC-MS/MS Quantification of SUMO Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After in-gel trypsin digestion, we analyzed peptide mixtures by capillary liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) on an Eksigent 1D plus LC with a MicroAS autosampler (Dublin) online with an Orbitrap Velos MS system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). We analyzed four sample types by 1D LC-MS for each quantification measurement consecutively on the same analytical column. The four sample types were: sample 1) WT expressing untagged SUMO; sample 2) WT expressing His8SUMO; sample 3) mcm10-1 mutants expressing untagged SUMO; sample 4) mcm10-1 mutants expressing His8SUMO. The quantitative analysis strategy included the following sample sets: A) triplicate injections of samples 1 to 4 analyzed in random order in MS1 (survey scan) only; B) directed MS/MS with inclusion lists for analytes differentially quantified between samples 2 and 4 that were undetected in control samples 1 and 3. Details of the trypsin digestion, LC-MS/MS, generetaion of an inclusion list, database searching, matching quantification and identification runs, optimization of directed MS runs and DDA analysis are in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. The proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (Vizcaino et al., 2014 (link)) via the PRIDE partner repository (PRIDE: PXD002607).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

LC-MS/MS Proteomic Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides from each fraction were analyzed on an LTQ Velos Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Agilent 1100 high performance liquid chromatography pump (Agilent Technologies) and a MicroAS autosampler (Thermo Scientific). Approximately 10% of each fraction was loaded on to a 17cm fused silica microcapillary column (100um inner diameter) with an in-house pulled tip (~5 um inner diameter) packed with C18 reversed-phase resin (Magic C18AQ, Michrom Bioresources). Peptides were eluted into the mass spectrometer’s nanospray ionization source via a two-step gradient of 7–25% buffer B (2.5% water and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (v/v)) in buffer A (2.5% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water (v/v)) over 60 minutes followed by a second phase of 25–45% buffer B over 20 minutes. The mass spectrometer collected 10 ion-trap MS/MS spectra per data-dependent cycle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Oligonucleotide Separations for RNA Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotide separations were performed on a Thermo Finnigan Surveyor MS Pump. Samples were injected using a Thermo Finnigan micro AS auto sampler. RNase digestion products were separated on an Waters XBridge™ C18 column (3.5 um, 1.0 × 150 mm) with MPA of 200 mM HFIP, 8 mM triethylamine (TEA) in water, pH 7.0 and MPB of 50% MPA and 50% methanol at a flow rate of 30 μL/min. RNase digestion products were eluted using a gradient from 5 %B to 20 %B in 5 min, followed by 1.7% increase of B/min until 95 %B. NOTE: HFIP and TEA will contaminate the HPLC and mass spectrometer ionization source. Removing this contamination is time consuming, so the use of a dedicated platform for RNA modification mapping is recommended.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!