The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

140 protocols using vivaspin

1

Production and Characterization of Fungal Secretomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on previous studies [12 (link),13 (link)], fungal cultures were grown in 250 mL baffled Erlenmeyer flasks with 100 mL medium containing 2.5 g/L−1 of maltose as a starter, 15 g/L−1 (based on dry matter) of an autoclaved MB fraction (provided by ARD, Pomacle, France), Avicel® (Avicel PH-101, Sigma-Aldrich), WS and WS-R as a carbon source, 1.842 g/L−1 of diammonium tartrate as a nitrogen source, 0.5 g/L−1 yeast extract, 0.2 g/L−1 KH2PO4, 0.0132 g/L−1 CaCl2/2H2O and 0.5 g/L−1 MgSO4/7H2O. In parallel, a reference culture was made with 20 g/L−1 of maltose as a carbon source. Cultures were incubated in the dark at 30°C with shaking at 120 rpm. The cultures were stopped 10 days after inoculation in all the inducing conditions, and the culture broths (secretomes) were filtered (using 0.2 μm polyethersulfone membrane, Vivaspin, Sartorius), diafiltered with 50 mM acetate solution buffer pH 5.2, concentrated (Vivaspin with a 10 kDa cut-off polyethersulfone membrane, Sartorius) and then stored at −20°C until use.
The total amount of proteins was assessed using Bradford assays (Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate, Ivry, France) with a BSA standard that ranged from 0.2 to 1 mg/mL−1. Gel electrophoresis and carboxymethyl cellulose zymograms were performed as described elsewhere [49 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of His-Tagged Fusion Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solubilized protein was incubated for 1 hour with washed and pre-equilibrated Strep-Tactin Superflow plus resin (Qiagen). The resin was then loaded into an Econo-Column Chromatography Column (Biorad) for gravity flow purification. The resin was washed 10 x with 2 volumes of wash buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.03 % (w/v) DDM).
Stepwise protein elution was performed in wash buffer supplemented with 5 mM desthiobiotin (IBA-Lifesciences). The eluted protein was then treated with His-tagged human rhinovirus 3C protease (HRV 3C) to cleave off the C-terminal eGFP fusion and the tag. Reverse IMAC was performed to remove the protease. The protein was then concentrated to 0.5 ml using a 50 kDa cutoff concentrator (Vivaspin, Sartorius, MWCO 50 kDa). Size-exclusion chromatography was carried out on a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.03% (w/v) DDM, 1 μM cyanopindolol. The protein was concentrated to 3 mg/ml using a 50 kDa cutoff concentrator (Vivaspin, Sartorius). The purified protein was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 o C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Folding of Bistable RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The unmodified bistable 20 nt RNA and the supplementary RNAs (3′-HP, A2-DMA, 5′-HP, G6-m1G, 5′-ssOV) were solid phase synthesized and purchased by Dharmacon (horizon inspired call solutions). 2′-ACE Protection group was removed as described in the provided protocol by Dharmacon. After deprotection the RNA was purified via rp-HPLC (reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography) with a Kromasil RP18 100A 5 μm 10 × 250 mm column (binding buffer: 2 mM Tetrabutylammoniumbisulfat, 50 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 pH 5.9, elution buffer: binding buffer + 60% (v/v) Acetonitril). The HPLC fractions were lyophilized and dissolved in H2O. Analytical denaturing 15%-PAA (polyacrylamide) gel verified corresponding fractions that were desalted with 2 ml 2 kDa centrifugal concentrator (Vivaspin, Sartorius) at 4°C and 6000 g. After desalting LiClO4 (2% LiClO4 in acetone) precipitation followed. Buffer exchange to NMR buffer (50 mM BisTris, 25 mM NaCl, pH 6.4) was done with 2 ml 2 kDa centrifugal concentrator (Vivaspin from Sartorius) up to a factor of at least 1000. The NMR sample was in situ folded at 95°C for 5 min followed by cooling on ice. For sequences and sample conditions of all RNAs used see SI Supplementary Table S4 and Table S6)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Recombinant Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents, unless otherwise stated, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Nickel-NTA agarose resin and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) were purchased from Gold Biotechnology. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), acrylamide, and tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) were purchased from Bio-Rad and Luria-Broth powder was purchased from IBI Scientific. During the protein expression process, cells and cell lysate were pelleted using an Avanti J-E centrifuge (Beckman Coulter). Proteins were concentrated using an Allegra X-14R centrifuge with three types of 3-kDa molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) centrifugal units: Amicon Ultra (Millipore, 15 mL capacity), Vivaspin (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, 2 mL capacity), and Vivaspin (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, 0.5 mL capacity). The Ec-ACP plasmid pTL1426 (link) (N- and C-terminal His6 tags; kanamycin resistant) was provided by the Khosla Lab at Stanford University. The Ec-ACP plasmid pKJ5535 (N-terminal His6 tag only; kanamycin resistant) was constructed as described in Supporting Information. The ACPact plasmid (pMC002067; carbenicillin resistant) was provided by the Chang Lab at University of California Berkeley.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification of Influenza NS1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was obtained as previously described in [35 (link)]. In brief, HEK293T cells were transfected with the plasmids encoding NS1 and grown for two days in serum-free medium. Then, cell culture fluids were collected, cell debris was removed by centrifugation and samples were concentrated by VivaSpin (Sartorius, Mw 100 kDa). Concentrated samples were subjected to an FPLC column of Sephadex 200. High-molecular weight protein fractions (90 kDa–300 kDa) were collected and analyzed by Western blot with anti-NS1 antibodies (clone 4C4, Biosan, Novosibirsk, Russia) (Supplementary Figure S1A,B). Fractions with maximum amounts of NS1 were pooled, concentrated with VivaSpin (Sartorius, Mw 5 kDa) and analyzed in gel followed by Coomassie blue staining. Cell culture fluids of cells transfected with pVax were processed the same as NS1-containing samples and were used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The virulence factor production and real virulence of P. aeruginosa were measured using Tenebrio molitor larvae by injecting the culture supernatants or live bacterial cells, respectively, as described previously (19 (link), 20 (link)). The aliquots were taken from the P. aeruginosa culture at 6 h and 24 h, and cells were removed by centrifugation at 4°C. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (GVS Abluo Syringe Filter) and concentrated by a 10-kDa cutoff Centricon (Vivaspin, Sartorius). Five μL of the concentrated supernatants, insect saline (130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, and 1 mM CaCl2) or LB were injected into T. molitor larvae using a syringe. Insect saline (IS) and LB were both used as controls. For the live cell injection, the cultured cells were diluted to 1.12 × 105 CFU/mL in insect saline and 5.6 × 102 CFU (5 μL) was injected into each T. molitor larva by syringe. The larvae were incubated in petri dishes at 25°C and the surviving larvae were counted every 24 h. Survival rate was presented as a percentage (%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The virulence factor production and real virulence of P. aeruginosa were measured using Tenebrio molitor larvae by injecting the culture supernatants or live bacterial cells, respectively, as described previously (19 (link), 20 (link)). The aliquots were taken from the P. aeruginosa culture at 6 h and 24 h, and cells were removed by centrifugation at 4°C. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (GVS Abluo Syringe Filter) and concentrated by a 10-kDa cutoff Centricon (Vivaspin, Sartorius). Five μL of the concentrated supernatants, insect saline (130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, and 1 mM CaCl2) or LB were injected into T. molitor larvae using a syringe. Insect saline (IS) and LB were both used as controls. For the live cell injection, the cultured cells were diluted to 1.12 × 105 CFU/mL in insect saline and 5.6 × 102 CFU (5 μL) was injected into each T. molitor larva by syringe. The larvae were incubated in petri dishes at 25°C and the surviving larvae were counted every 24 h. Survival rate was presented as a percentage (%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification of Nervous Necrosis Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NNV (SgNag05 isolate, RGNNV genotype, serotype C)17 (link),18 (link) was cultured using SSN-1 cells5 (link) maintained at 25 °C with Leibovitz’s L-15 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco) and 100 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin solution (Gibco) (L-1510 medium). NNV particles were purified by methods described previously19 (link)–22 (link). Cultured NNV suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resultant supernatant was dialyzed using a Biotech cellulose ester (CE) membrane tube with a molecular weight cut off (MWCO) of 106 (Spectrum Laboratories). After anion-exchange chromatography with a Hi-trap Q column (GE Healthcare), NNV particles were eluted with 700 mM NaCl. The resultant NNV suspension was desalted and concentrated by centrifugal ultrafiltration using a membrane with MWCO of 105 (Vivaspin, Sartorius).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PTPN4 Mutant Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The variants of PTPN4 named F620G, Q621G, Y52G, I623G and ΔFQYI were obtained by using the Quik-Change Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the substitutions were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Template DNA used for PTPN4 mutants was the PDZ-PTPWT construct cloned in a pET15b expression plasmid. The PTP construct was obtained by using the Pwo polymerase (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the insertion was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Template DNA used for the PTP construct was a synthetic construct comprising the PTP domain cloned in a pgex6p1 expression plasmid. Expression and purification of linker-PTP and PTP construct were performed as described previously13 (link). Bidomain PDZ-PTP variants were expressed and purified as previously described without TEV cleavage. Briefly, clarified supernatants were loaded on Ni2+ column (HiTrap Chelating HP, GE), washed and eluted with an imidazole gradient from 40 mM to 1 M. The eluted fractions containing the protein were pooled and loaded on a gel filtration column (Hiload Superdex 75 pg, GE). Proteins were concentrated using centrifugal filter devices (Vivaspin, Sartorius). Protein concentration was estimated from its absorbance at 280 nm. The peptide Cyto8-RETEV (SAESHKSGRETEV) was synthesized in solid phase using a Fmoc strategy (JPT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Adsorption on Ragweed Pollen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw or chemically processed RW pollens were heated with SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer (20 mg RW pollen/ml) at 95 °C for 10 min. Resulting solutions were then filtered using Vivaspin centrifugal concentrators (1000 kD MWCO, Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany) at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C.
To study OVA adsorption on RW surface, chemically processed pollens were incubated in OVA solution (5 mg RW per 500 μg OVA in 0.3 ml PBS) under vacuum. After overnight incubation, RW pollens were separated from the solution by centrifugal filtration. RW pollens were either dried (before washing group), or further washed three times with PBS, and then dried at 4 °C (after washing group). These dried RW pollens were then heated with sample loading buffer (20 mg RW pollen/ml) at 95 °C for 10 min to desorb the proteins. Pollens were then separated by centrifugal filtration and filtrates were analyzed.
SDS-PAGE analysis was performed by adding 20 μl of each sample to individual lanes of a 4–20% gradient gel and stained with Coomassie solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!