The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using freezone freeze dryer

1

Fabrication of Multifunctional Bone Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare GF/MSNs scaffold, 10 mg of MSNs were first dispersed in 100 μL PBS, 15 μL of MSN suspension was added into GF scaffold. To prepare GF/MSN-BMP2 scaffold, 10 mg of MSNs was mixed with 60 μL of 100 μg/mL BMP2/PBS solution with shaking at 4 °C for 2 h. The BMP2- loaded MSNs were collected after centrifuging (3381 RCF, Eppendorf, USA) and about 50 μL supernatant was collected. About 3 μg BMP2 was loaded into MSNs. Next, the BMP2 loaded MSN was redistributed in 100 μL of PBS solution, the BMP2 concentration was 30 μg/mL. 15 μL MSN-BMP2 was then added onto GF scaffold (450 ng BMP2 was loaded on each GF/MSN-BMP2). To prepare GF/MSN-BMP2/CTS scaffold, 10 μL of 0.1% genipin crosslinked CTS solution was added to GF/MSN-BMP2 scaffold and freeze dried. To prepare GF/DFO sample, 10 μL of 10 mM DFO solution was added into GF scaffold. To prepare GF/MSN/CTS-DFO scaffold, 10 mM DFO and 0.1% (wt%) chitosan (CTS, 1% acetic acid) were mixed with Genipin and crosslinked at 4 °C for 24 h. After crosslinking, 10 μL of CTS-DFO was added into GF and GF/MSN-BMP2 scaffolds. To prepare GF/MSN-BMP2/CTS-DFO scaffold, 15 μL MSN-BMP2 solution was first added into GF scaffold, 10 μL CTS-DFO solution was then added to GF/MSN-BMP2 scaffold. The prepared scaffolds were then frozen and freeze dried (Labconco Freezone Freeze Dryers, Kansas City, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of Lipid Glycans (LGs)

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To purify LGs, the reaction was performed using a sample volume of 100 mL. The synthesized LGs were purified using the YMC ODS AQ-HG column (120 Å, 10 μm, 20 × 250 mm) (YMC, Kyoto, Japan) connected to a photodiode array detector by modifying the ÄKTA purifier system (GE Healthcare, Stockholm, Sweden). The purity of fractions was evaluated by HPLC. Selected fractions were evaporated using the Hei-VAP Rotary Evaporator (Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany) and then dried using FreeZone freeze dryers (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). Dried samples were maintained at -20°C until further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cold-Brew Coffee Polysaccharide Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To use the cold water extraction method, coffee (D company, Seoul, Korea) was extracted with a coffee : water ratio of 1:10 using a tower-type cold water extraction device fabricated using separatory funnels. One liter of water was poured on 100 g of commercial coffee powder to pass the coffee layer for 12 h. The extracted coffee solution was then collected (2 ). To separate crude polysaccharides from the collected coffee solution, four volumes of 95% ethanol per volume of collected coffee solution were added. The solution was left unattended overnight, then subjected to centrifugation (6,000 rpm, 30 min), whereupon the precipitate was collected. The precipitate was then dissolved in a small amount of distilled water and subjected to dialysis for two days using a dialysis tubing (cut-off 12,000~14,000 Da, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) to selectively remove low-molecular-weight substances. Then, the precipitate was lyophilized (FreeZone Freeze Dryers, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) to obtain crude polysaccharide (CCP-0) (cold-brew coffee polysaccharide) (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescent BSA Conjugation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 160 mg of BSA were dissolved in 40 mL of 0.1 M PBS buffer (pH 8). Afterward, the solutions of FITC in ethanol (5 mg/mL) or TRITC in DMSO (5 mg/mL) were prepared. Then, 40 mL of BSA solution was added to 5 mL of FITC/TRITC solution under gentle stirring and further the mixture was stirred under 4 °C in the dark for 12 h. Finally, freshly prepared FITC-conjugated (or TRITC-conjugated) BSA was dialyzed for 3 days in deionized water then freeze-dried 24 h after the cooling period using FreeZone Freeze Dryers Labconco (Kansas City, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microstructural Analysis of Masticated Black Beans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of oral mastication on the microstructure of the black beans was visualized under light microscope as described previously by Gwala et al. [21 (link)]. Briefly, boluses were lyophilised (Labconco FreeZone freeze dryer, Kansas City, MO, USA) and milled to pass through a 425 µm mesh screen. A small amount of the sample powder was dispersed in distilled water on a microscope slide, covered, and then observed under a light microscope (Ceti, Auckland, New Zealand). Micrographs were viewed at 10× magnification and captured using a camera (Medline Scientific, Oxfordshire, UK) attached to the microscope controlled by a camera control software (ToupTek ToupView, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Cryopreserved Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WJ-MSCs from three donors at passage 3 were seeded separately into Nunc™ culture flasks (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at a density 3 × 103/cm2 and were cultured till 90% confluence. One day before CM harvesting, the medium was completely changed, and only one half of the original medium volume was added to concentrate the growth factors and other analytes in the CM. In the following 24 h, the secretome was collected, centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min and filtered through a 0.22 µm filter (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland). Concurrently, WJ-MSCs were harvested to assess the number of cells producing CM.
The CM from each sample was divided into 9 groups (100 µl CM per sample). One CM sample was fast frozen and stored at − 80 °C (control group). The remaining 8 samples were intended for lyophilization. One half of these CM samples (4 samples) was lyophilized without additional manipulations, whereas the other half (4 samples) was supplemented with trehalose prior to lyophilization. For this, 400 mM trehalose solution was added (1:10) to obtain a final trehalose concentration of 40 mM. The CM samples for lyophilization were fast frozen at − 80 °C and were freeze-dried using a FreeZone freeze dryer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). The freeze-dried samples were stored at − 80 °C, − 20 °C, + 4 °C and at room temperature (RT) for 3 and 30 months. All samples were prepared in duplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction and Preparation of Celery Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole celeries (individually wrapped and labeled) from Australia were purchased from local supermarkets in Singapore, and the stems and leaves were washed with deionized water before freeze-drying in a Labconco FreeZone freeze-dryer (Kansas City, MO, USA). The freeze-dried samples were ground and stored in light-protected centrifuge tubes at −80 °C before extraction. For the preparation of celery stem (CSE) and leaf (CLE) extracts, stem (0.200 g)/leaf (0.100 g) powder were added to 2 mL of 80% ethanol (v/v) adjusted to pH 1, followed by sonication at 80 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, the extract was cooled in water under ambient conditions for 5 min, centrifuged (15,400 rpm) for 10 min and filtered using a 0.2 µm PTFE filter. The supernatant was dried under vacuum, stored at −80 °C and reconstituted with DMEM before cell treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of GIL-MCGO Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GIL-MCGO nanocomposites were dried by a Labconco FreeZone freeze dryer (Kansas City, MO, USA). All batch extraction experiments were performed on a ZWY-240 thermostats cultivating shaker (Shanghai, China). Concentration of DNA was determined by a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA). The magnetic hysteresis and morphology of GIL-MCGO nanocomposites were characterized by a MicroSense EV11 Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (Lowell, MA, USA), a STA 409 PC Thermogravimetric analysis (Germany) and a Hitachi HT-7700 transmission electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cod Skin Gelatin Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cod gelatin (G) was extracted from the skin of Atlantic cod following the standard procedure. The cod skin was defrosted, cut into square pieces of 5 × 5 mm and then defatted by washing with ethanol.
The cut cod skin was mixed with distilled water at a ratio of 1:3 (w/w) and stirred for 10 min. Gelatin extraction was carried out at different pH values of the aqueous phase (pH 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 8.0 and 9.0) for 3 h at a temperature of 50 ± 1 °C with constant stirring at a speed of 80–100 rpm. The samples of gelatin (G3, G4, G5, G8, and G9, respectively) were obtained. Glacial CH3COOH and 4 M NaOH were used to adjust the pH of the aqueous phase.
After extraction, the reaction mixture was neutralized to pH 5.5–6.0 and then filtered.
The method of vacuum filtration at a temperature of 30 °C was used, and a paper filter (Ekros, St. Petersburg, Russia) with a pore diameter of 12 μm (Akros, Russia) was used. The filtrate (gelatin solution) was dried in a FreeZone freeze dryer (Labconco, Kansas City, USA) at a temperature of −50 °C and a residual pressure of 3.0 Pa. The gelatin obtained was stored at 5 °C until further use.
The product yield (B, %) was calculated using the following formula:
where m is the mass (g) of dried gelatin, and M is the mass (g) of dried raw material with a moisture content of up to 10%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mesquite Gum Purification for AuNP Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mesquite gum purification methodology described by Moreno-Trejo et al. [24 (link)] was employed to obtain purified mesquite gum to synthetize AuNPs. First, the mesquite exudate pearls were carefully chosen and cleaned using established methods; basically, the lighter pearls were selected, while the darker pearls, rich in tannins, were discarded from the further process, and then any little sticks from the mesquite tree and any present dirt were mechanically removed from the lighter pearls [29 (link),30 ]. Subsequently, the cleaned pearls were pulverized using a mortar. The resulting powder was then dissolved in distilled water at room temperature and left to hydrate for 24 h. After the hydration period, the liquid was filtered using a Whatman no. 2 filter paper to remove impurities. The filtered solution was then frozen for 15 h and subsequently lyophilized using a FreeZone freeze dryer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) for 26 h [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!