The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ab198288

1

Comprehensive Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as previously described.21 (link) The following primary antibodies were used: APOC1 (1:1000, ab198288), cyclin B1 (1:5000, ab32053), cyclin D1 (1:5000, ab134175), caspase-9 (1:1000, ab202068), BCL-2 (1:500, ab32124), ERK1/2 (1:500, ab196883), phospho-ERK1/2 (1:500, ab65142), and GADPH (1:2500, ab9485) were purchased from Abcam Inc. Phospho-p38 (1:1000, #9211), p38 (1:1000, #9212), phospho-JNK (1:1000, #9251) and JNK (1:1000, #9252) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA). Goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (1:2000, ab6721, Abcam) was used as a second antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SAOS-2 Cell Immunoprecipitation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAOS-2 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Protech Technology Enterprise Co., Ltd.) including protease inhibitors at 4˚C to obtain the protein. Subsequently, samples (250 µl) were incubated overnight at 4˚C with IgG (1:50; cat. no. ab172730; Abcam), anti-APOC1 (1:40; ab198288; Abcam) or anti-MTCH2 antibodies (1:50; 16888-1-AP; Proteintech). A total of 30 µl protein A/G magnetic beads (MilliporeSigma) was added and incubated overnight at 4˚C. The beads were washed with PBS and immunoprecipitants were assessed via western blotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining of APOC1 in CRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following procedures were performed by classical biotin–streptavidin–peroxidase IHC staining protocols according to previously described methods.19 (link) Briefly, the protein expression of APOC1 was detected by anti-APOC1 (1:200, ab198288, Abcam Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibody and a goat anti-mouse/rabbit secondary antibody (Gene Tech Co Ltd, GTVisionTM III Detection System/Mo&Rb, Shanghai, China). To estimate the score for the 140 cases of CRC paraffin-embedded samples, five high-power fields were chosen randomly for the assessment of APOC1 expression in a double-blind procedure. The sample scores were based on both the intensity of staining and the proportion of positively stained tumor tissue. The immunostaining results were scored based on the following system: for staining intensity scoring: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), 3 (strong); for staining area scoring: 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) and 4 (76–100%). The staining index was calculated as the product of the proportion of positive tissue × the staining intensity score (range from 0 to 12). An optimal cutoff value was identified as follows: a staining index score ≥6 was considered as tumors with high APOC1 expression and ≤4 was considered as tumors with low expression of APOC1.20 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of APOC1 in Renal Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lines and renal tissues were lysed using RIPA Lysis Buffer (Beyotime biotechnology, Shanghai, China), and proteins were harvested and quantified using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit (Beyotime biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Proteins were separated on a 15% gel using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% non-fat milk for 2 h. After incubation with an anti-APOC1 antibody (1:1,000, ab198288, Abcam), and an anti-GAPDH antibody (1:2,500, ab9485, Abcam) overnight at 4°C, the membranes were washed three times with TBS-T (TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20). Subsequently, the membranes were incubated in a secondary antibody solution at room temperature for 2 h. After washes, the signals were detected using the chemiluminescence system and analyzed with Image Lab Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Plasma Apolipoproteins and Enzymes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal volumes of fasted plasmas were separated on SDS–PAGE gels and transferred onto 0.2 μM nitrocellulose membranes at 75 volts for 30 min. Membranes were blocked with Tris buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% non-fat dry milk and probed with anti-apoAI antibody (rabbit polyclonal 1:5,000 Merck #178422) and anti-apoC-I antibody (rabbit monoclonal 1:1,000 Abcam #ab198288) overnight at 4°C. They were then washed three times in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Signals were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence and Gel Doc System (Bio-Rad). The signal intensity was quantified using Image Lab (Bio-Rad) and NIH ImageJ software (v1.45s). Plasma PON1 (Cloud-Clone, #SEA243Hu) and SERPINA1 (Abcam, #ab108799) were measured by ELISA following the manufacturer’s protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of APOC1 in ccRCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining and evaluation of it was performed as in previously described methods (17 (link)). In brief, the protein expression of APOC1 in serial ccRCC tumor tissues from TMAs was detected by anti-APOC1 antibody (1:400, ab198288, Abcam) and a secondary antibody (1:5,000, L3012-2, SAB). Immunoreactive score of Remmele and Stegner (IRS) system was used to determine the protein expression level. From previous methods, a final score >1 was considered a high APOC1 expression; otherwise, it was considered as low APOC1 expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying APOC1 and GAPDH Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as previously described [61 (link)]. The primary antibodies against APOC1 (1:1000, #ab198288; Abcam, USA) and GAPDH (1:2000, #5174; Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA) were used to incubate the membranes. Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H&L) (1:1000, No. A0208; Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used as a second antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Expression Analysis in RCC Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells or RCC tissues were lysed in RIPA on ice for 15 min, and the mixture was centrifuged for isolating protein samples. The concentration of protein was determined by BCA method. After adjusting protein samples to the same concentration (2ug/ul), they were denaturated, separated by SDS-PAGE, and loaded on PVDF membrane. The membrane was cut into small pieces according to the molecular size and blocked in TBST containing 5% skim milk for 2 h. They were incubated with primary (1:1000) and secondary antibodies (1:3000), followed by band exposure using ECL and grey value analyses using ImageJ software. Antibodies were purchased from Abcam (APOC1: ab198288, Wnt3a: ab219412, β-Catenin: ab32572, Vimentin: ab92547, N-cadherin: ab76011) and Cell Signaling Technology (GAPDH: 5174, MMP2: 40994, MMP9: 13667, CCND1: 55506, TCF7: 2203, anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!