The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Photochem apparatus

Manufactured by Analytik Jena
Sourced in Germany

The Photochem® apparatus is a laboratory instrument designed for the measurement of photochemical parameters. It provides precise control and monitoring of various photoreaction parameters, enabling researchers to study light-induced chemical processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using photochem apparatus

1

Antioxidant Profiling of Cookie Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 200 mg of powdered cookies were extracted with 80% methanol according to methodology described by Przygodzka et al. [26 (link)]. Then extracted samples were stored in −80 °C before prior analysis of antioxidant and reducing capacity (DPPH, PCL, and FRAP assays).
Therefore, DPPH assay was established to measure antioxidants (extracted from cookies) scavenging ability against DPPH radicals [39 (link)]. The measurement were performed at a microplate reader (Tecan M1000 Infinite PRO) with the wavelength established at 517 nm. Results were presented as mmol Trolox per gram of sample. PCL method was used to measure ability of antioxidants from cookies to scavenge superoxide anion radicals (O2−•). The measurement was performed using PHOTOCHEM apparatus (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) according to protocols elaborated by Zieliński et al. [40 (link)]. The extracts of cookies were determined in two methodologies: for lipophilic antioxidants (PCL ACL) and hydrophilic (PCL ACW) methodology extracts of were expressed as µmol Trolox per gram of sample. The reducing power was determined using FRAP assay according to Horszwald and Andlauer [39 (link)]. The mixture’s absorbance was measured at 593 nm after 5 min reaction with microplate reader (M1000 Infinite PRO, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). The FRAP method is based on the reduction of ferric ion by antioxidant compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Assessment in Animal Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Indicators of antioxidant activity were evaluated in breast muscle, liver and serum. Photochem® apparatus (Analytik Jena, Leipzig, Germany) was used to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of water-soluble substances (ACW) and the antioxidant capacity of lipid-soluble substances (ACL) using a photoluminescent (PCL) method based on the scavenging activity against the superoxide anion radical [19 (link)]. PCL ACW and PCL ACL kits were obtained from Analytik Jena Ag (Jena, Germany).
Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) assay was carried out according to microplate method described by Horszwald and Andlauer, [12 (link)] and the results were expressed as milligram of Trolox per gram of dry matter of breast/liver or milligram of Trolox per millilitre of serum.
Additionally, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels were determined in liver for measuring lipid peroxidation according to the method described by Ognik and Wertelecki, [20 (link)]. Results were expressed in micromole of malondialdehyde (MDA) per kilogram of tissue. The reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) concentrations were also determined in liver by an enzymatic recycling method described by Rahman et al. [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation of Bee Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DPPH scavenging activity was determined with a method described by Brand-Williams et al. [42 (link)]. A decrease in the absorbance of the solution obtained was monitored at 517 nm using an Infinite M1000 PRO plate reader (Tecan Group AG, Männedorf, Switzerland). Results were presented as µmol Trolox per gram of sample. The ABTS test described by Horszwald and Andlauer [41 (link)] was used to determine bee product extract’s antioxidant activity. Measurements were carried out using the plate reader. The antioxidant activity was expressed as mmol Trolox/g sample. The PCL method with the Photochem apparatus (Analytik Jena, Leipzig, Germany) was used to measure antioxidants’ effectiveness against superoxide anion radicals. Antioxidant activity was analyzed using the ACW (antioxidative capacities of water-soluble compounds) and ACL (antioxidative capacities of lipid-soluble compounds) kits. The assay was conducted as previously described by Sawicki et al. [10 (link)]. The data obtained was presented as µmol Trolox per gram of sample.
The reducing power was determined using the FRAP assay according to Horszwald and Andlauer [41 (link)]. The mixture’s absorbance was measured at 593 nm after 5 min reaction using a microplate reader. The FRAP method is based on the reduction of ferric ion by antioxidant compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antioxidant Capacity Analysis of Bread

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TPC method was applied as previously described in details by Krupa-Kozak et al. [33 (link)]. The microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, MultiscanTM microplate reader, Altrincham, UK) was used to read absorbance at λ = 755 nm on 96-well plates. Gallic acid (stock solution of 1 mg/mL) was used to build a calibration curve (R2 = 0.999) and therefore, the results were expressed as mg/g of dry weight.
The Photochem® apparatus (Analytik Jena, Leipzig, Germany) was used to analyze the ability of bread extracts to scavenge the superoxide anion radical (O2•−) by water- and lipid-soluble antioxidants (ACW and ACL modes). The photochemiluminescence (PCL) assay was performed as described by Zieliński et al. [36 (link)]. Trolox was used as a standard (R2 = 0.9988 in ACW; R2 = 0.9926 in ACL). The results were calculated as µmol Trolox eq./g of dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Photochemiluminescence Antioxidant Capacity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCL test measures the antioxidant activity of a sample against superoxide anion radicals with a Photochem® apparatus (Analytik Jena, Leipzig, Germany) based on the method of Popov and Lewin [38 ]. The radicals are generated from luminol, a photosensitizing agent, which generates radicals upon exposure to UV light (Double Bore® phosphor lamp, output 351 nm, 3 mW/cm2). Antioxidant capacity was measured at 25 °C using the manufacturer’s antioxidant capacity of liposoluble substance (ACL) kit. The kinetic light emission curve, which does not show a lag phase in ACL studies, was monitored for 180 s and expressed as μmol equivalent of Trolox (standard, TE) per gram of sample. The areas under the curves were calculated using the PCL soft control and analysis software. The samples were suitably diluted in methanol prior to analysis. The antioxidant assay was performed in triplicate and 10 μL of each sample diluted in HPLC grade methanol was sufficient to match the standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Photochemiluminescence Assay for Antioxidant Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A photochemiluminescence (PCL) assay was performed as described by Zieliński, Zielińska, and Kostyra [31 (link)]. This method was used to measure the antioxidant capacity of BLP and freeze-dried GF extracts against superoxide anion radicals generated from the luminol photosensitiser under exposure to UV light in the Photochem apparatus (Analytik Jena, Leipzig, Germany). Antioxidant activity was analysed with ACW (hydrophilic condition) and ACL (lipophilic condition) kits according to the manufacturer’s protocols. For ACW, a 50-mg sample was extracted with 1 mL of water, and for ACL—a 50-mg sample was extracted with 1 mL of the MeOH and hexane mixture (4:1; v/v). The concentration of the extract solution was adjusted to ensure that the generated luminescence was within the range of the standard curve. Antioxidant capacity was calculated by comparing the delay time of the sample with the Trolox standard curve, and it was expressed in μmol Trolox g−1 DM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ferric reducing power was determined using the FRAP assay, based on the reduction of ferric ion by antioxidant compounds, according to Horszwald and Andlauer [34 (link)]. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 593 nm after a 5-min reaction with the microplate reader (M1000 Infinite, Tecan, Switzerland). All measurements were conducted in triplicate. The results obtained were expressed as µmol Trolox per gram of the DM sample.
The photochemiluminescence (PCL) method was used to measure the ability of antioxidants from specific extracts to scavenge superoxide anion radicals (O2−•). The measurement was performed using the PHOTOCHEM® apparatus (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) according to the protocols elaborated by Zieliński et al. [36 (link)]. The 50% ethanolic extracts were determined with two methodologies for water-soluble (ACW) and lipid-soluble (ACL) antioxidants. The results were expressed as µmol Trolox per gram of the sample, whereas the total PCL values were calculated as the sum of the results obtained for ACL and ACW. All measurements were conducted in triplicate. The results obtained were expressed as µmol Trolox per gram of the DM sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Superoxide Anion Radical Antioxidant Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCL method with the Photochem apparatus (Analytik Jena, Leipzig, Germany) was used to measure antioxidants’ effectiveness against superoxide anion radicals. Antioxidant activity was analyzed using the ACW (antioxidative capacities of water-soluble) and ACL (antioxidative capacities of lipid-soluble) kits. The assay was conducted as previously described by Sawicki et al. [32 (link)]. For ACW and ACL tests, the luminal reagent and Trolox working solution were prepared according to the protocol. Juice solution concentration added that the generated luminescence was in the range limits of the standard curve. Therefore, the lag time (180 s) for the ACW test was used as a free radical scavenging activity. The antioxidant activity was calculated by comparing it with the Trolox standard curve (0.5–3 nmol) and expressed as µmol Trolox/mL juice. In the ACL test, the kinetic light emission curve, showing no lag phase, was monitored for 180 s and expressed in µmol Trolox/mL. The antioxidant test was performed in triplicate for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!