The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using turboionspray

1

UHPLC-QTOF-MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detection and quantification was performed with a Nexera X2 Shimadzu UHPLC coupled with a 5600+ ToF-MS detector (SCIEX, Foster City, CA) equipped with a Turbo Ion Spray electrospray ionization source working in positive mode (ESI+). In terms of chromatographic conditions a column Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm) was used and kept at 30 °C, the autosampler was maintained at 10 °C to refrigerate the samples and a volume of 20 μL of sample extract was injected in the column. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid [a] and acetonitrile [B] with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and with the following gradient program: 0–12 min from 90% to 30% [A]; 12–13 min from 30% to 10% [A] and kept until 14 min; back to 90% [A] from 14 to 15 min until the end of the run (total of 17 min). In terms of mass spectrometry the acquisition was performed in full-scan from 100 to 750 Da using the Analyst® TF (SCIEX, Foster City, CA) software and with the following settings: ion source voltage of 5500 V; source temperature 575 °C; curtain gas (CUR) 30 psi; Gas 1 and Gas 2 of 55 psi; declustering potential (DP) 100 V. Every 10 injections the ToF-MS detector was calibrated in the mass range of the method, to guarantee the accurate mass resolution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of SAM, SAH, and Hcy Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAM, SAH, and Hcy metabolites were quantified based on the platform developed by Xu et al. [73 (link)] with the following modifications, which were specific for these metabolites. The LC-MS/MS system consisted of an ABI 4000 QTRAP tandem mass spectrometer employing an electrospray ion source (Turbo Ion Spray™) (SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) in positive ionization mode in combination with a LC-10AD LC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a SIL-HTC autosampler. The metabolites were separated on a SeQuant ZIC–pHILIC column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) with guard column (SeQuant ZIC–pHILIC, 20 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm particle size). The column temperature was set at 45 °C and the flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. Good chromatographic separation was observed with a 13 min gradient program consisting of mobile phases solvent A (20 mM ammonium formate, pH3.5) and solvent B (100% acetonitrile). Elution commenced with 80% B for one min, a linear gradient from 80% B to 5% B for 5 min, followed by a linear gradient back to 80% lasting 2 min, then isocratic hold on 80% for another 5 min. MS parameters were set as follows: ion source temperature (450 °C), ion spray voltage (5000 V), curtain gas (25 psig), collision gas (8 psig), ion source gas 1 (20 psig), ion source gas 2 (20 psig) interface heater activated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mass Spectrometry Protocol for Analyte Fragmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS was performed on a triple TOF 5600 and 6600 mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Toronto, Canada), each equipped with a TurboIonSpray™ ESI source. Data acquisition was achieved using Analyst software 1.6.1 and 1.5.2. In fragmentation experiments, analyte solutions were diluted thousand times with diluents and infused into the MS through a syringe pump at 10 μL/min. Optimized MS parameters were as follows: Source temperature, 500 °C; ion spray voltage, 5500 V; nebulizer, heater, and curtain gas (N2), 50, 50, 20 psi, respectively. Declustering potential (DP), collision energy (CE), and air flow (AF2) values were tuned manually in each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Paraoxon Degradation Analysis in [Ch][Ala]/Water

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detection of 2 and compound 5 (Scheme 2), formed in the
Paraoxon degradation in [Ch][Ala]/water mixtures, was undertaken on
an AB Sciex Triple Quad 4500 (UHPLC–MS/MS) mass spectrometer
equipped with a Turbo Ion Spray (AB Sciex) ion source. A microsyringe
pump delivered the mixed reaction of Paraoxon in the presence of [Ch][Ala]/water
mixtures (1 mol % IL) at an infinite time dissolved in 10% (v/v) acetonitrile
into the ESI source at a flow rate of 10 μL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasma DTG Quantification Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma samples were analyzed for DTG using a validated analytical method [9 ]. DTG was extracted from human plasma by protein precipitation using acetonitrile containing [15 N 2H7]-DTG as an internal standard. Extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy using a TurboIonSpray® (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) interface with positive ion multiple reaction monitoring. The lower limit of the assay was 5 ng ml–1 or 20 ng ml–1 depending on the study, with a within- and between- run precision of ≤8.0% and ≤7.5%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Antiepileptic Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detection employed a Qtrap 5500 mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada) equipped with a TurboIon Spray™ source. Data acquisition and integration were performed using Applied Biosystems Analyst software version 1.6.3. MS parameters optimized for each analyte and IS by infusion of their respective standards using a syringe pump at a flow rate of 20 μL/min. The declustering potentials (V) and collision energies (eV) were as follows: VAN 100, 20; MER 140, 33; VPA −180, −10; MER-D6 110, 21, and VPA-D6 −190, −12. VAN, MER, and MER-D6 were detected by positive ion ESI and the transitions (m/z) for MRM were VAN 725.5 → 144.2, MER 384.3 → 113.9, and MER-D6 390.3 → 147.3. VPA and VPA-D6 were detected by negative ion ESI and the transitions (m/z) for MRM were VPA 143.3→143.3 and VPA-D6 149.3→149.3 (Figure 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Compound Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detection of Compounds 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d for degradation of 1 (See Scheme 2), were identified by an ABSciex Triple Quad 4500 (UHPLC-MS/MS) mass spectrometer equipped with a Turbo Ion Spray (AB Sciex) ion source. A microsyringe pump delivered the mixed reaction of 1 with piperidine in DMSO at infinite time dissolved in 10% (vol/vol) acetonitrile into the ESI source at a flow rate of 10 μL/min. ESI and the QQ (linear trap) mass spectrometer were operated in the negative-ion mode for detecting 1a and 1c and the positive mode for 1b and 1d by using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) scan types. Main conditions: curtain gas nitrogen flow = 10 mL min-1; ion spray voltage = −4,500 eV; declustering potential = −60 eV; entrance potential = −10 eV; collision cell exit potential = −12 eV; source temperature was set at 300°C and source gas GS1 and GS2 were set to 12 and 0, respectively. All data were acquired using Analyst 1.6.2 (AB Sciex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bioanalytical Validation of Deucravacitinib and Moxifloxacin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry system for deucravacitinib and moxifloxacin consisted of an API 4000 with the TurboIonSpray (AB Sciex LLC; Framingham, Massachusetts) interface operated in the positive ion mode. Quantitation was performed by selected reaction monitoring (m/z 426.2 → m/z 358.2 for deucravacitinib; m/z 431.2 → m/z 359.2 for BMT‐143848‐03; m/z 402.2 → m/z 358.3 for moxifloxacin; m/z 406.2 → m/z 362.2 for moxifloxacin‐d4).
Linear regression analysis was conducted using a weighting of 1/x2. The calibration ranges were 0.5 ng/mL (lower limit of quantitation) to 500 ng/mL (upper limit of quantitation) for deucravacitinib and 25.0 ng/mL (lower limit of quantitation) to 5000 ng/mL (upper limit of quantitation) for moxifloxacin.
Assessment of assay performance for deucravacitinib indicated between‐run precision of ≤0.6% coefficient of variation, within‐run precision of ≤2.6% coefficient of variation, and accuracy of ±4.8% mean percent deviation from nominal concentration. The assay performance was also assessed for moxifloxacin (≤1.8%, ≤2.2%, and ±4.0%, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scalable Synthesis and Purification of A2E

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A2E was synthesized in the dark using a commercial microwave synthesizer “Microwave 300” (Anton Paar GmbH, Austria). To scale up A2E synthesis45 all-trans retinal (100 mg equivalent to 352 µmol) and ethanolamine (9.5 µL; 155 µmol) were added in ethanol (3 mL) in the presence of acetic acid (9.3 µL; 155 µmol) using stochiometric ratios as described.29 (link) Further, large scale purification was achieved using liquid partitioning46 (link) to obtain HPLC pure A2E.
Chromatography separation and peak monitoring were achieved using an ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UPLC; Thermo Accela; Thermo Electron Corp., Waltham, MA, USA) system with a quaternary pump connected to an online degasser and photodiode array detector (PDA). The UPLC system was coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer (4000 Q-Trap; AB Sciex Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). ChromQuest software version 4.1 (San Jose, CA, USA) was used to control all parameters of UPLC. For analytical separations, an Xterra RP 18 column was used (4.6 × 150 mm with 5 µm particle size; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Ionization of analytes was accomplished by electrospray ionization (ESI; TurboIon Spray; ABSciex) operating in the positive ion mode followed by tandem mass spectrometric analysis. Data acquisition and integration were performed by Analyst 1.5.2 software (ABS Biosystems, Foster City CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UHPLC-QTOF Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation was performed using an ExonLC system (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). The chromatographic column was a Waters Acquity UHPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) with an operating temperature of 35 °C. The experiment was performed with 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (v/v) as mobile phase A and acetonitrile solution (without formic acid) as mobile phase B. The following gradient program was used: 0–5min 3%–8% B, 5–11min 8%–30% B, 11–20min 30%–80% B, 20–21min 80%–95% B, 21–27min 95% B. 27–27.5min 95%–3% B, 27.5–32min 3% B. The sample injection volumes were all 2 μL. A 5600 Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source (Turbo Ionspray) (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) was used to provide high-resolution detection in this experiment. MS detection work in positive and negative ion modes. Summary of mass spectrometer parameters: Gas 1 and Gas 2, 45 psi; Curtain gas, 35 lbs. Heat block temperature:550; ion spray voltage negative −4.5 kV and negative 5.5 kV; declustering potential,50 v; collision energy,35 v; collision energy spread (CES) of 15 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!