The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss pasw 18

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS/PASW 18 is a statistical analysis software package designed for data management, analysis, and reporting. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data manipulation, exploration, modeling, and visualization. The software is widely used in various industries and academic settings to analyze and interpret complex data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using spss pasw 18

1

Surgical Outcomes and Complications Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using SPSS (PASW) 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to estimate the relationship between year of surgery and clinical outcome, correcting for age, gender, BMI at inclusion, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and type of surgery. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the differences in minor and major complication rates between the different types of procedures, corrected for surgeon, baseline characteristics and type of procedure. Multivariate analysis was also used for comparing the percentages of patients revisiting the hospital without having a complication over the years, correcting for the same covariates. Results were evaluated at a significance threshold of p < 0.05 (two-sided).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Obesity and Cardiometabolic Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using SPSS (PASW) 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Due to non-Gaussian distribution, both TG and CRP are described as median and minimum-maximum. Categorical data were described as an absolute number as well as a percentage of the total cohort.
Differences between obese and non-obese subjects were analyzed using independent T tests, chi-squared tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
The relationship between BMI quintiles and metabolic and inflammatory parameters was analyzed using one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test in case of non-Gaussian distribution.
Patients on statins were excluded from the analyses on the relation between BMI and total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, C3, CRP, and apoB. Subjects on antihypertensive drugs were excluded from analyses on the relation between BMI and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Subjects on glucose-lowering drugs were excluded from the analysis on the relation between BMI and glucose. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated in order to analyze the relationship of BMI with the different adipose tissue surfaces. Results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval at a significance threshold of p < 0.05 (two-sided).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Semantic Clustering and Recall Strategies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total recall scores were calculated by summing the number of words correctly recalled in the Related uncued and Related Cued word conditions separately. Total semantic clustering scores were also calculated as objective measures of semantic categorization strategy use. Observed semantic clustering scores for each related word list were calculated by summing the number of semantic clusters during recall. A semantic cluster occurred whenever a participant recalled two words in succession from the same semantic category. These clustering scores were adjusted for chance [Observed Expected: (# Clusters -- (# Clusters / 4.23))], and averaged across the two lists for each instruction type (uncued and Cued) [30 (link)]. Total recall and total semantic clustering scores were entered into Instruction (uncued, Cued) by Training (Pre-training, Post-training) repeated measures ANOVAs in SPSS/PASW 18 (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Behavioral Assessment of Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data was analysed using SPSS (PASW) 18 (IBM). For behavioural experiments, logarithmic transformation (log2) was carried out on the paw withdrawal thresholds (g) before statistical analysis as Levene’s test for equality of variance was significant [69 (link),70 (link)]. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used for all time course experiments. To proceed to further post hoc testing at least one main effect (CFA treatment or toxin) or interaction was required to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Subsequent two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was carried out to determine if there was an overall effect of CFA or toxin across a specific time window. For cell count experiments and RT-qPCR experiments independent samples t-tests were used to compare means between two groups. In all tests a p-value of < 0.05 was deemed significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Semantic Clustering and Recall Strategies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total recall scores were calculated by summing the number of words correctly recalled in the Related uncued and Related Cued word conditions separately. Total semantic clustering scores were also calculated as objective measures of semantic categorization strategy use. Observed semantic clustering scores for each related word list were calculated by summing the number of semantic clusters during recall. A semantic cluster occurred whenever a participant recalled two words in succession from the same semantic category. These clustering scores were adjusted for chance [Observed Expected: (# Clusters -- (# Clusters / 4.23))], and averaged across the two lists for each instruction type (uncued and Cued) [30 (link)]. Total recall and total semantic clustering scores were entered into Instruction (uncued, Cued) by Training (Pre-training, Post-training) repeated measures ANOVAs in SPSS/PASW 18 (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating the Quality of Dying Hospice Measure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PASW SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. Data were prescreened for outliers and missing values. Missing items were substituted using the expectation maximization method appropriate for validity testing.27 (link),28 (link) Construct validity of the QOD-Hospice was evaluated with: 1) a convergent test examining associations with conceptually related measures – the LSNS-6, DASS-21, TRIG-2, and care satisfaction; 2) an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) exploring the measure’s structure. EFA was deemed appropriate despite the limited sample size.29 To determine the number of factors, the study used parallel analysis with direct oblimin rotation.30 For factor selection, we used a conservative loading threshold of 0.50 to ensure parsimony and interpretability.31 To examine measurement reliability, the following estimates were calculated: Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency; percentage agreement (i.e., the proportion of scale scores falling within one standard deviation among caregivers of the same decedent) and intraclass correlation (ICC) for inter-rater reliability among caregivers of the same decedent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Patient Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient baseline characteristics are expressed as median (range) for continuous data, and as numbers with percentages for categorical data. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences in categorical variables, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Variables achieving statistical significance at the 0·1 level in univariable analysis were considered for multivariable analysis. A backward variable procedure was used to identify independent predictive factors. A P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant and odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed with PASW (SPSS) 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Descriptive Statistical Analysis of OS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS PASW18). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. OS was calculated in our study at one year with Stata/IC 15.0 program. Given that the objective of the study was merely descriptive, and therefore, there was not hypothesis to be confirmed, the sample estimation prior to the study was not necessary.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Caval Index Predicts Fluid Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS PASW-18. Baseline characteristics in responders and non-responders were compared using the Mann Whitney U test, and for nominal variables using the Fisher exact test. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare paired values before and after fluid therapy. Linear correlation between the change in systolic blood pressure and the caval index was tested using the Spearman Rank method. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the threshold value of the caval index which provided the prediction of the response to fluid therapy with the best sensitivity and specificity. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!